Tobias Welte

Tobias Welte


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 August 2010 in Thorax
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Tobias WelteTobias Welte
Tobias Welte
ATA Torres
A Torres
DND Nathwani
D Nathwani
It is difficult to determine the impact of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Europe, because precise data are scarce. Mortality attributable to CAP varies widely between European countries and with the site of patient management. This review analysed the clinical and economic burden, aetiology and resistance patterns of CAP in European adults. All primary articles reporting studies in Europe published from January 1990 to December 2007 addressing the clinical and economic burden of CAP in adults were included. A total of 2606 records were used to identify primary studies. CAP incidence varied by country, age and gender, and was higher in individuals aged ≥65 years and in men. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common agent isolated. Mortality varied from <1% to 48% and was associated with advanced age, co-morbid conditions and CAP severity. Antibiotic resistance was seen in all pathogens associated with CAP. There was an increase in antibiotic-resistant strains, but resistance was not related to mortality. CAP was associated with high rates of hospitalisation and length of hospital stay. The review showed that the clinical and economic burden of CAP in Europe is high. CAP has considerable long-term effects on quality of life, and long-term prognosis is worse in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia.

15 October 2009 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Tobias WelteTobias Welte
Tobias Welte
MMMarc Miravitlles
Marc Miravitlles
PHPaul Hernandez
Paul Hernandez
GEGöran Eriksson
Göran Eriksson
SPStefan Peterson
Stefan Peterson
RKRomain Kessler
Romain Kessler
Rationale: Budesonide/formoterol and tiotropium are commonly used maintenance treatments for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Combining these medications may provide additional benefits. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol added to tiotropium in patients eligible for inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination therapy. Methods: In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study, after a 2-week run-in, 660 subjects (75% male; mean age, 62 yr; FEV1, 1.1 L; 38% predicted normal), 40 years of age or older, received tiotropium (18 μg once daily) plus either budesonide/formoterol (320/9 μg) (n = 329) or placebo (n = 331) twice daily. Measurements and Main Results: Clinic predose (primary outcome) and postdose FEV1, predose and postdose forced vital capacity and inspiratory capacity, and health status were measured. Other outcomes included daily measurements taken at home (pre- and postdose morning FEV1 and peak expiratory flow, morning symptoms and activities, and morning reliever use), severe exacerbations, and tolerability. Over the treatment period, budesonide/formoterol plus tiotropium significantly increased predose FEV1 by 6% (65 ml) and postdose by 11% (123 and 131 ml at 5 and 60 min postdose, respectively) versus tiotropium alone (both P < 0.001). Other outcomes all significantly improved with budesonide/formoterol plus tiotropium versus tiotropium alone. The number of severe exacerbations decreased by 62% (rate ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.25–0.57; P < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, budesonide/formoterol added to tiotropium versus tiotropium alone provides rapid and sustained improvements in lung function, health status, morning symptoms and activities, and reduces severe exacerbations. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00496470).

1 December 2015 in Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMScott T Micek
Scott T Micek
RWRichard G Wunderink
Richard G Wunderink
MKMarin H Kollef
Marin H Kollef
CCCatherine Chen
Catherine Chen
JRJordi Rello
Jordi Rello
VMVandana Menon
Vandana Menon
Introduction: Pseudomonas aeruginosanosocomial pneumonia (Pa-NP) is associated with considerable morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, increased costs, and mortality.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients withPa-NP to determine 1) risk factors for multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains and 2) whether MDR increases the risk for hospital death. Twelve hospitals in 5 countries (United States, n = 3; France, n = 2; Germany, n = 2; Italy, n = 2; and Spain, n = 3) participated. We compared characteristics of patients who had MDR strains to those who did not and derived regression models to identify predictors of MDR and hospital mortality.Results: Of 740 patients withPa-NP, 226 patients (30.5%) were infected with MDR strains. In multivariable analyses, independent predictors of multidrug-resistance included decreasing age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-0.98), diabetes mellitus (AOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.21-3.00) and ICU admission (AOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.06-2.81). Multidrug-resistance, heart failure, increasing age, mechanical ventilation, and bacteremia were independently associated with in-hospital mortality in the Cox Proportional Hazards Model analysis.Conclusions: Among patients withPa-NP the presence of infection with a MDR strain is associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Identification of patients at risk of MDRPa-NP could facilitate appropriate empiric antibiotic decisions that in turn could lead to improved hospital survival.

10 March 2021 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJames D. Chalmers
James D. Chalmers
MCMegan L. Crichton
Megan L. Crichton
PGPieter C. Goeminne
Pieter C. Goeminne
BCBin Cao
Bin Cao
MHMarc Humbert
Marc Humbert
NRNicolas Roche
Nicolas Roche
Introduction: Hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a result of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have a high mortality rate and frequently require non-invasive respiratory support or invasive mechanical ventilation. Optimising and standardising management through evidence-based guidelines may improve quality of care and therefore patient outcomes.Methods: A task force from the European Respiratory Society, and endorsed by the Chinese Thoracic Society, identified priority interventions (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) for inclusion in this “living guideline” using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes) format. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) approach was used for assessing the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Systematic literature reviews were performed, and data pooled by meta-analysis where possible. Evidence tables were presented and evidence-to-decision frameworks were used to formulate recommendations.Results: Based on the available evidence at the time of guideline update (14 February 2022) the panel makes a strong recommendation in favour of the use of systemic corticosteroids in patients requiring supplementary oxygen or ventilatory support, and of interleukin-6 receptor antagonist monoclonal antibodies or baricitinib for patients requiring supplementary oxygen and for the use of anticoagulation in hospitalised patients. The panel makes a conditional recommendation for continuous positive airway pressure in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure and for combination treatment with casirivimab and imdevimab in patients who have no detectable SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (seronegative) and a susceptible variant. No recommendation was made for remdesivir in patients requiring supplemental oxygen. The panel recommended against multiple therapeutics, including hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, convalescent plasma, lopinavir-ritonavir and colchicine. Further recommendations for research are made.Conclusion: Several interventions reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 infection. These guidelines will be regularly updated as further evidence becomes available.

1 May 2018 in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJens M Hohlfeld
Jens M Hohlfeld
JVJens Vogel-Claussen
Jens Vogel-Claussen
HBHeike Biller
Heike Biller
DBDominik Berliner
Dominik Berliner
KBKorbinian Berschneider
Korbinian Berschneider
Tobias WelteTobias Welte
Tobias Welte

14 July 2017 in Respiratory Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMichael Kreuter
Michael Kreuter
JSJeff Swigris
Jeff Swigris
DPDavid Pittrow
David Pittrow
SGSilke Geier
Silke Geier
JKJens Klotsche
Jens Klotsche
JBJürgen BEHR
Jürgen BEHR
The INSIGHTS-IPF registry provides one of the largest data sets of clinical data and self-reported patient related outcomes including health related quality of life (QoL) on patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We aimed to describe associations of various QoL instruments between each other and with patient characteristics at baseline. Six hundred twenty-three IPF patients with available QoL data (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire SGRQ, UCSD Shortness-of-Breath Questionnaire SoB, EuroQol visual analogue scale and index EQ-5D, Well-being Index WHO-5) were analysed. Mean age was 69.6 ± 8.7 years, 77% were males, mean disease duration 2.0 ± 3.3 years, FVC pred was 67.5 ± 17.8%, DLCO pred 35.6 ± 17%. Mean points were SGRQ total 48.3, UCSD SoB 47.8, EQ-5D VAS 66.8, and WHO-5 13.9. These instruments had a high or very high correlation (exception WHO-5 to EQ-5D VAS with moderate correlation). On bivariate analysis, QoL by SGRQ total was statistically significantly associated with clinical symptoms (NYHA; p < 0.001), number of comorbidities (p < 0.05), hospitalisation rate (p < 0.01) and disease severity (as measured by GAP score, CPI, FVC and 6-min walk test; p < 0.05 each). Multivariate analyses showed a significant association between QoL (by SGRQ total) and IPF duration, FVC, age, NYHA class and indication for long-term oxygen treatment. Overall, IPF patients under real-life conditions have lower QoL compared to those in clinical studies. There is a meaningful relationship between QoL and various patient characteristics. The INSIGHTS-IPF registry is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT01695408 ).