Joseph Jakes

Dr. Joseph Jakes

USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI 53726, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 February 2012 in Biomacromolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMariko Ago
Mariko Ago
KOKunihiko Okajima
Kunihiko Okajima
Joseph JakesJoseph Jakes
Joseph Jakes
SPSunkyu Park
Sunkyu Park
Orlando RojasOrlando Rojas
Orlando Rojas

1 April 2008 in Journal of Materials Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Joseph JakesJoseph Jakes
Joseph Jakes
CFCharles Frihart
Charles Frihart
JBJ.F. Beecher
J.F. Beecher
Robert J. MoonRobert J. Moon
Robert J. Moon
DSD.S. Stone
D.S. Stone

1 March 2009 in Journal of Materials Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Joseph JakesJoseph Jakes
Joseph Jakes
CFCharles Frihart
Charles Frihart
JBJ.F. Beecher
J.F. Beecher
Robert J. MoonRobert J. Moon
Robert J. Moon
PRPedro Resto
Pedro Resto
DSD.S. Stone
D.S. Stone

1 January 2008 in Journal of the Electrochemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KTK. Tapily
K. Tapily
Joseph JakesJoseph Jakes
Joseph Jakes
DSD. S. Stone
D. S. Stone
PSP. Shrestha
P. Shrestha
DGD. Gu
D. Gu
AEA. A. Elmustafa
A. A. Elmustafa
The challenges of reducing gate leakage current and dielectric breakdown beyond the 45 nm technology node have shifted engineers’ attention from the traditional and proven dielectric <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SiO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>SiO2 to materials of higher dielectric constant also known as high- <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math>k materials such as hafnium oxide <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>HfO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>(HfO2) and aluminum oxide <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Al</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>(Al2O3) . These high- <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math>k materials are projected to replace silicon oxide <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SiO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>(SiO2) . In order to address the complex process integration and reliability issues, it is important to investigate the mechanical properties of these dielectric materials in addition to their electrical properties. In this study, <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>HfO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>HfO2 and <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Al</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>Al2O3 have been fabricated using atomic layer deposition (ALD) on (100) p-type Si wafers. Using nanoindentation and the continuous stiffness method, we report the elastomechanical properties of <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>HfO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>HfO2 and <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Al</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>Al2O3 on Si. ALD <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>HfO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>HfO2 thin films were measured to have a hardness of <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>9.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.5em"></mml:mspace><mml:mtext>GPa</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math>9.5±2GPa and a modulus of <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>220</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.5em"></mml:mspace><mml:mtext>GPa</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math>220±40GPa , whereas the ALD <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Al</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>Al2O3 thin films have a hardness of <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.5em"></mml:mspace><mml:mtext>GPa</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math>10.5±2GPa and a modulus of <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>220</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.5em"></mml:mspace><mml:mtext>GPa</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math>220±40GPa . The two materials are also distinguished by very different interface properties. <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>HfO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>HfO2 forms a hafnium silicate interlayer, which influences its nanoindentation properties close to the interface with the Si substrate, while <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Al</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>Al2O3 does not exhibit any interlayer.

29 November 2019 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Joseph JakesJoseph Jakes
Joseph Jakes
CHChristopher Hunt
Christopher Hunt
Samuel L. ZelinkaSamuel L. Zelinka
Samuel L. Zelinka
PCPeter N. Ciesielski
Peter N. Ciesielski
Nayomi PlazaNayomi Plaza
Nayomi Plaza
Despite the importance of cell wall diffusion to nearly all aspects of wood utilization, diffusion mechanisms and the detailed effects of moisture remain poorly understood. In this perspective, we introduce and employ approaches established in polymer science to develop a phenomenological framework for understanding the effects of moisture on diffusion in unmodified wood cell walls. The premise for applying this polymer-science-based approach to wood is that wood polymers (cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin) behave like typical solid polymers. Therefore, the movement of chemicals through wood cell walls is a diffusion process through a solid polymer, which is in contrast to previous assertions that transport of some chemicals occurs via aqueous pathways in the cell wall layers. Diffusion in polymers depends on the interrelations between free volume in the polymer matrix, molecular motions of the polymer, diffusant dimensions, and solubility of the diffusant in the polymer matrix. Because diffusion strongly depends on whether a polymer is in a rigid glassy state or soft rubbery state, it is important to understand glass transitions in the amorphous wood polymers. Through a review and analysis of available literature, we conclude that in wood both lignin and the amorphous polysaccharides very likely have glass transitions. After developing and presenting this polymer-science-based perspective of diffusion through unmodified wood cell walls, suggested directions for future research are discussed. A key consideration is that a large difference between diffusion through wood polymers and typical polymers is the high swelling pressures that can develop in unmodified wood cell walls. This pressure likely arises from the hierarchical structure of wood and should be taken into consideration in the development of predictive models for diffusion in unmodified wood cell walls.

10 March 2015 in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Joseph JakesJoseph Jakes
Joseph Jakes
CHChristopher Hunt
Christopher Hunt
DYDaniel J. Yelle
Daniel J. Yelle
LLLinda Lorenz
Linda Lorenz
KHKolby Hirth
Kolby Hirth
CFCharles Frihart
Charles Frihart