Richard A. Lafayette

Dr. Richard A. Lafayette


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2013 in Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KCKatharine L Cheung
Katharine L Cheung
RLRichard A. Lafayette
Richard A. Lafayette

14 August 2023 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RLRichard A. Lafayette
Richard A. Lafayette
JKJens Kristensen
Jens Kristensen
ASAndrew Stone
Andrew Stone
JFJürgen Floege
Jürgen Floege
VTVladimir Tesař
Vladimir Tesař
JBJonathan Barratt
Jonathan Barratt

1 November 2020 in Kidney International Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RLRichard A. Lafayette
Richard A. Lafayette
BRBrad H. Rovin
Brad H. Rovin
HRHeather N. Reich
Heather N. Reich
JTJames A. Tumlin
James A. Tumlin
JFJürgen Floege
Jürgen Floege
JBJonathan Barratt
Jonathan Barratt
Narsoplimab is a human monoclonal antibody against mannan-associated lectin-binding serine protease−2 (MASP-2). Now in a phase 3 study, narsoplimab was evaluated in a staged phase 2 study assessing safety and effectiveness in high-risk patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN). Substudy 1 was a single-arm open-label study of 12 weekly infusions and tapered corticosteroids, with 6 weeks of follow-up. In substudy 2, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a course of treatment consisting of once-weekly narsoplimab or vehicle infusions for 12 weeks. After 6 weeks of follow-up, both substudy 2 groups could continue in an open-label extension, receiving 1 or more narsoplimab courses at the investigator’s discretion. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) included headache, upper respiratory infection, and fatigue. Most AEs were mild or moderate and transient. No treatment-related serious AEs were reported. All 4 patients who were enrolled in substudy 1 had reductions in 24-hour urine protein excretion (UPE) at week 18, ranging from 54% to 95% compared with baseline. In substudy 2, the vehicle and narsoplimab groups had similar proteinuria reductions at week 18. Eight patients (3 vehicle, 5 narsoplimab) continued in the dosing extension; all received narsoplimab. Median reduction in 24-hour UPE in these 8 patients was 61.4% at 31 to 54 weeks postbaseline. Estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) remained stable in both substudies. This interim analysis suggests that narsoplimab treatment is safe, is well tolerated, and may result in clinically meaningful reductions in proteinuria and stability of eGFR in high-risk patients with advanced IgAN.

1 October 2018 in Kidney International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJianling Tao
Jianling Tao
LMLaura Mariani
Laura Mariani
SESean Eddy
Sean Eddy
HMHolden Maecker
Holden Maecker
NKNeeraja Kambham
Neeraja Kambham
RLRichard A. Lafayette
Richard A. Lafayette

1 January 2014 in Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WHWael Hussein
Wael Hussein
RLRichard A. Lafayette
Richard A. Lafayette
Purpose of review Renal dysfunction during pregnancy is a common and serious complication. Understanding normal physiology during pregnancy provides a context to further describe changes in pregnancy that lead to renal dysfunction and may provide clues to better management. Recent findings Hormonal changes during pregnancy allow for increased blood flow to the kidneys and altered autoregulation such that glomerular filtration rate (GFR) increases significantly through reductions in net glomerular oncotic pressure and increased renal size. The mechanisms for maintenance of increased GFR change through the trimesters of pregnancy, continuing into the postpartum period. Important causes of pregnancy-specific renal dysfunction have been further studied, but much needs to be learned. Pre-eclampsia is due to abnormal placentation, with shifts in angiogenic proteins and the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system leading to endothelial injury and clinical manifestations of hypertension and organ dysfunction. Other thrombotic microangiopathies occurring during pregnancy have been better defined as well, with new work focusing on the contribution of the complement system to these disorders. Summary Advances have been made in understanding the physiology of the kidney in normal pregnancy. Diseases that affect the kidney during pregnancy alter this physiology in various ways that inform clinicians on pathogenesis and may lead to improved therapeutic approaches and better outcomes of pregnancy.

25 October 2024 in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RLRichard A. Lafayette
Richard A. Lafayette
JTJames Tumlin
James Tumlin
RFRoberta Fenoglio
Roberta Fenoglio
JKJessica Kaufeld
Jessica Kaufeld
Miguel  Ángel Pérez ValdiviaMiguel Ángel Pérez Valdivia
Miguel Ángel Pérez Valdivia
TIthe SANCTUARY Study Investigators
the SANCTUARY Study Investigators
Key Points: This phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluated the complement C5 inhibitor, ravulizumab, in adults with IgA nephropathy. A 30.1% (90% confidence interval, 13.7% to 43.5%) relative reduction in proteinuria for ravulizumab versus placebo was observed at approximately 6 months. Treatment with ravulizumab was well tolerated. Background: The complement system plays a central role in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. We present findings from a phase 2 trial of ravulizumab, a complement C5 inhibitor. Methods: The Study of Ravulizumab in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis or IgA Nephropathy (NCT04564339) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ravulizumab in addition to standard of care. Adults with IgA nephropathy, proteinuria ≥1 g/d, and eGFR ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and on stable renin-angiotensin blockade were randomized 2:1 to ravulizumab (intravenous every 8 weeks) or placebo for 26 weeks. From week 26–50, all participants received open-label ravulizumab. The primary end point was percentage change in proteinuria from baseline to week 26. Secondary end points included change in proteinuria at week 50 and eGFR. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were evaluated. Results: Forty-three patients were randomized to ravulizumab and 23 to placebo. At week 26, a statistically significant reduction in proteinuria was observed with ravulizumab versus placebo: −41.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], −50.2% to −32.0%) change in urine protein with ravulizumab and −16.8% (95% CI, −31.8% to 1.6%) change with placebo (30.1% treatment effect; P = 0.005). At week 50, there was a −44.8% (95% CI, −55.1% to −32.1%) change from baseline in urine protein with ravulizumab, and in patients who crossed over from placebo to ravulizumab at week 26, the change from baseline (week 0) to week 50 was −45.1% (−58.0% to −28.4%). The least squares mean change in eGFR from baseline to week 26 with ravulizumab was 0.2 (95% CI, −2.3 to 2.7) ml/min per 1.73 m2 and with placebo was −4.5 (−7.9 to −1.1) ml/min per 1.73 m2. From baseline to week 50, the least squares mean change in eGFR with ravulizumab was −3.9 (95% CI, −6.4 to−1.3) ml/min per 1.73 m2, and in patients who crossed over from placebo to ravulizumab at week 26, it was −6.3 (−9.7 to −2.9) ml/min per 1.73 m2. Ravulizumab was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that for placebo. Conclusions: An early, sustained, and clinically meaningful reduction in proteinuria and trend toward stabilization of eGFR were observed with ravulizumab versus placebo. A phase 3 trial (NCT06291376) is enrolling. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Study of Ravulizumab in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis or IgA Nephropathy, NCT04564339. Podcast: This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2024_10_26_KTS_October2024.mp3