Lisette Leliveld

Dr. Lisette Leliveld


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2013 in Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLisette Leliveld
Lisette Leliveld
Jan LangbeinJan Langbein
Jan Langbein
BPBirger Puppe
Birger Puppe

1 April 2016 in Physiology & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLisette Leliveld
Lisette Leliveld
SDSandra Düpjan
Sandra Düpjan
ATArmin Tuchscherer
Armin Tuchscherer
BPBirger Puppe
Birger Puppe

1 April 2011 in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLisette Leliveld
Lisette Leliveld
MSMarina Scheumann
Marina Scheumann
EZElke Zimmermann
Elke Zimmermann
In mammals individual distinctiveness in vocalizations provides the basis for individual recognition and thus plays an important role in social behavior. In this study, first evidence is provided for a nocturnal primate that variation in individual distinctiveness across the vocal repertoire is to some extent determined by the context and the acoustic structure of the call types. Individual distinctiveness was investigated across call types in the gray mouse lemur, a nocturnal primate, living in a dispersed multi-male multi-female social system. To explore to what degree context and acoustic structure predict variations in individual distinctiveness, four major call types were examined (grunts, tsaks, short whistles, and trills). Call types differed in context and acoustic structure and were recorded under controlled experimental conditions. A discriminant function analysis revealed that all call types are individually distinct, but not to the same degree. The findings suggest that variations in individual distinctiveness can to some extent be explained by the context and the acoustic structure of the call types.

1 November 2017 in Physiology & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLisette Leliveld
Lisette Leliveld
SDSandra Düpjan
Sandra Düpjan
ATArmin Tuchscherer
Armin Tuchscherer
BPBirger Puppe
Birger Puppe

28 September 2018 in Current Zoology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CGCharlotte Goursot
Charlotte Goursot
SDSandra Düpjan
Sandra Düpjan
EKEllen Kanitz
Ellen Kanitz
ATArmin Tuchscherer
Armin Tuchscherer
BPBirger Puppe
Birger Puppe
LLLisette Leliveld
Lisette Leliveld
Animal individuality is challenging to explain because individual differences are regulated by multiple selective forces that lead to unique combinations of characteristics. For instance, the study of personality, a core aspect of individuality, may benefit from integrating other factors underlying individual differences, such as lateralized cerebral processing. Indeed, the approach-withdrawal hypothesis (the left hemisphere controls approach behavior, the right hemisphere controls withdrawal behavior), may account for differences in boldness or exploration between left and right hemispheric dominant individuals. To analyze the relationships between personality and laterality we tested 80 male piglets with established laterality patterns for 2 motor functions (tail curling direction and the side of the snout used for manipulation) and a combined classification integrating both motor functions using cluster analysis. We analyzed basal salivary testosterone and cortisol along with their behavior in standardized tests as pre-established indicators of different personality traits (Boldness, Exploration, Activity, Sociability, and Coping). We found that the direction of the single motor biases showed significant associations with few personality traits. However, the combined laterality classification showed more, and more robust, significant associations with different personality traits compared with the single motor biases. These results supported the approach-withdrawal hypothesis because right-biased pigs were bolder and more explorative in a context of novelty. Additionally, right-biased pigs were more sociable than left-biased pigs. Therefore, the present study indicates that personality is indeed related to lateralized cerebral processing and provides insight into the multifactorial nature of individuality.

24 January 2013
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
EZElke Zimmermann
Elke Zimmermann
LLLisette Leliveld
Lisette Leliveld
SSSimone Schehka
Simone Schehka
Recent findings from speech, music and nonverbal acoustic communication suggest that some basic acoustically conveyed emotions are universally expressed and recognized across cultures. In this review, we explore a “prehuman origin hypothesis of affective prosody” using a comparative approach with nonhuman mammals. Based on our own work and an extensive literature review, we extracted comparable behavioural contexts in which empirical data on the expression and perception of acoustically conveyed affect intensity could be compared across different mammalian orders. Despite different set-ups, study designs and methods of acoustic analysis, comparative data revealed that affect intensity was similarly encoded across contexts and species, and that acoustically conveyed affect intensity was of significant relevance for listeners. This work supports the hypothesis that affective prosody in human acoustic communication has deep-reaching phylogenetic roots, deriving from precursors already present and relevant in the vocal communication systems of nonhuman mammals.