The continuous population increase of older adults with metabolic diseases may contribute to increased prevalence of sarcopenia and obesity and requires advocacy of optimal nutrition treatments to combat their deleterious outcomes. Sarcopenic obesity, characterized by age-induced skeletal-muscle atrophy and increased adiposity, may accelerate functional decline and increase the risk of disability and mortality. In this review, we explore the influence of dietary protein on the gut microbiome and its impact on sarcopenia and obesity. Given the associations between red meat proteins and altered gut microbiota, a combination of plant and animal-based proteins are deemed favorable for gut microbiota eubiosis and muscle-protein synthesis. Additionally, high-protein diets with elevated essential amino-acid concentrations, alongside increased dietary fiber intake, may promote gut microbiota eubiosis, given the metabolic effects derived from short-chain fatty-acid and branched-chain fatty-acid production. In conclusion, a greater abundance of specific gut bacteria associated with increased satiation, protein synthesis, and overall metabolic health may be driven by protein and fiber consumption. This could counteract the development of sarcopenia and obesity and, therefore, represent a novel approach for dietary recommendations based on the gut microbiota profile. However, more human trials utilizing advanced metabolomic techniques to investigate the microbiome and its relationship with macronutrient intake, especially protein, are warranted.

To investigate associations between body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, and components of sarcopenia (muscle mass and muscle strength/power), with bone microarchitecture measured by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in older adults with obesity. Seventy-four adults aged ≥ 55 years with body fat percentage ≥ 30 % (men) or ≥40 % (women) were included. Fat mass, lean mass and total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine areal bone mineral density (aBMD) were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Appendicular lean mass (ALM) was calculated as the sum of lean mass in the upper- and lower-limbs. BMI was calculated and participants completed physical function assessments including stair climb power test. Distal tibial bone microarchitecture was assessed using HR-pQCT. Linear regression (β-coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals) analyses were performed with adjustment for confounders including age, sex, smoking status, vitamin D and self-reported moderate to vigorous physical activity. BMI and ALM/height² were both positively associated with total hip, femoral neck and lumbar spine aBMD and trabecular bone volume fraction after adjusting for confounders (all p < 0.05). Body fat percentage was not associated with aBMD or any trabecular bone parameters but was negatively associated with cortical area (p < 0.05). Stair climb power (indicating better performance) was positively associated with cortical area and negatively associated with bone failure load (both p < 0.05). Higher BMI, ALM/height² and muscle power were associated with more favourable bone microarchitecture, but higher body fat percentage was negatively associated with cortical bone area. These findings suggest that high BMI may be protective for fractures and that this might be attributable to higher muscle mass and/or forces, while higher relative body fat is not associated with better bone health in older adults with obesity.

Age-related changes in fat and lean mass contribute to bone health, but these associations may be influenced by sex and ethnicity. This study investigated sex-specific associations of obesity and sarcopenia with bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) among Indian older adults. 1057 adults aged ≥ 50 years were included. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured BMD at the hip, spine and whole-body, and BMAD was calculated as BMD/√bone area. Obesity was defined by body fat percentage (cut points; > 25% for men and > 35% for women), and sarcopenia was defined using the revised Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia classification with low hand grip strength (< 28 kg for men and < 18 kg for women) and appendicular lean mass index (< 7.0 kg/m² for men and < 5.4 kg/m² for women). Participants were classified into four groups: controls (no obesity or sarcopenia), obesity, sarcopenia, or sarcopenic obesity. Linear regression (β-coefficients and 95%CI) analyses were performed with adjustments for age, smoking status, protein intake, and socioeconomic status. Prevalence of sarcopenia (37%) and sarcopenic obesity (6%) were higher in men than women (17% and 4%, respectively). Compared with controls, men with obesity had lower whole-body BMD and BMAD, but women with obesity had higher hip and spine BMD and BMAD (all p < 0.05). Men, but not women, with sarcopenic obesity, had lower hip and whole-body BMD and BMAD (all p < 0.05) than controls. Men with sarcopenia had lower BMD and BMAD at the hip only, whereas women had lower BMD at all three sites and had lower BMAD at the hip and spine (all p < 0.05), compared with controls. Obesity, sarcopenia, and sarcopenic obesity have sex-specific associations with BMD and BMAD in Indian older adults. With the aging population in India, it is important to understand how body composition contributes to poor bone health among older adults.