Chengbiao Leng

Dr. Chengbiao Leng

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2018 in Economic Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChengbiao Leng
Chengbiao Leng
DCDavid R Cooke
David R Cooke
ZHZeng-Qian Hou
Zeng-Qian Hou
NENoreen J. Evans
Noreen J. Evans
XZXing-Chun Zhang
Xing-Chun Zhang
JYJie-Hua Yang
Jie-Hua Yang
The Triassic Pulang porphyry Cu-Au deposit, located in the South Yidun terrane, is the oldest and one of the largest porphyry deposits in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau. The mineralization occurs mostly in the potassic alteration zone of the Pulang intrusive complex. U-Pb-He triple dating, namely apatite (U-Th)/He, zircon U-Pb, and zircon (U-Th)/He dating, together with inverse thermal modeling, reveals that the Pulang complex was emplaced at a paleodepth of ~5.0 to 6.5 km at 215 ± 2 Ma. The deep-level emplacement of the complex, coupled with the episodic replenishment of the magma chamber, gave rise to the establishment of a prolonged magmatic-hydrothermal system at Pulang. Although a range of single-grain zircon and apatite (U-Th)/He ages were obtained on each sample, the weighted mean zircon and apatite (U-Th)/He ages vary systematically with elevation, defining a multistage cooling/denudation history at Pulang. Specifically, three phases of cooling were recognized from inverse thermal modeling, including rapid cooling (80°–120°C/m.y.) in the Late Triassic, moderate cooling (3°–5°C/m.y.) from the Late Triassic to Early Cretaceous, and a protracted slow cooling period (50 m.y.) of extremely slow cooling and erosion at Pulang could be related to the formation and preservation of a peneplain on the southeastern Tibetan Plateau since the Late Cretaceous. A relict peneplain thus signifies a favorable tectonic environment for the preservation of ancient porphyry systems worldwide.

24 November 2012 in Mineralium Deposita
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLChengbiao Leng
Chengbiao Leng
XZXing-Chun Zhang
Xing-Chun Zhang
HZHong Zhong
Hong Zhong
RHRui-Zhong Hu
Rui-Zhong Hu
WZWei-De Zhou
Wei-De Zhou
CLChao Li
Chao Li

8 November 2023 in Mineralium Deposita
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLChengbiao Leng
Chengbiao Leng
DWDazhao Wang
Dazhao Wang
HYHai-Jun Yu
Hai-Jun Yu
FTFeng Tian
Feng Tian
XZXing-Chun Zhang
Xing-Chun Zhang

1 July 2024 in Mineralium Deposita
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DWDazhao Wang
Dazhao Wang
YLYuhang Liu
Yuhang Liu
CLChengbiao Leng
Chengbiao Leng
SZShiMin Zhen
ShiMin Zhen
QWQianxin Wang
Qianxin Wang
WJWenbin Jia
Wenbin Jia

26 July 2017 in Acta Geochimica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLChengbiao Leng
Chengbiao Leng
YWYuhui Wang
Yuhui Wang
XZXingchun Zhang
Xingchun Zhang
JGJianfeng Gao
Jianfeng Gao
WZWei Zhang
Wei Zhang
XXXinying Xu
Xinying Xu

10 December 2019 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TZTian Zhendong
Tian Zhendong
CLChengbiao Leng
Chengbiao Leng
XZXing-Chun Zhang
Xing-Chun Zhang
LZLi-Min Zhou
Li-Min Zhou
YTYan-Wen Tang
Yan-Wen Tang
The Yidun arc, located in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau, was formed by the westward subduction of the Ganze-Litang Paleo-Tethys ocean in Late Triassic. It is well-known for the formation of numerous Mesozoic porphyry-skarn Cu-Mo-(Au) deposits in the arc. To date, more than 20 Cu-Mo-(Au) deposits (>10 million tonnes Cu resources) have been discovered in the southern Eastern Yidun arc. However, few Cu-Mo deposits have been discovered in the northern Eastern Yidun arc. In recent years, some Cu-Mo deposits or occurrence are successively discovered in the northern Eastern Yidun arc, but their ore-forming ages are not well constrained. It remains unclear whether such Cu-Mo mineralization formed by similar metallogenic event and geodynamic setting as the Cu-Mo-(Au) mineralization in the south. In order to determine the metallogenic age and shed light on potential links between Cu-Mo mineralization and regional magmatic events, we present molybdenite Re-Os and zircon U-Pb ages to constrain the timing of two types of Cu-Mo mineralization in the northern Eastern Yidun arc (type I and type II). Molybdenite ICP-MS Re-Os dating results show that type I mineralization was formed at 217.7 ± 3.6 Ma, which is highly consistent with the formation ages of the host granite (218.1 ± 1.5 Ma, 2σ, n = 15, MSWD = 0.92) and aplite dyke (217.3 ± 1.3 Ma, 2σ, n = 16, MSWD = 0.50) within error. While the type II mineralization has a relatively younger formation age of 211.8 ± 4.7 Ma than the host granite (217.1 ± 1.5 Ma, 2σ, n = 14, MSWD = 0.96) and type I Cu-Mo mineralization. These data indicate that the Cu-Mo mineralization in the northern Eastern Yidun arc was temporally and spatially related to the Late Triassic magmatism in the region. Rhenium (Re) concentrations in the molybdenite from type I mineralization, ranging from 12.77 to 111.1 ppm (typically > 100 ppm), indicate that the ore-forming metals were derived mainly from a mantle source. However, Re contents in molybdenite from the type II mineralization, ranging from 7.983 to 10.40 ppm, indicate that the ore-forming metals were derived from a mixed mantle and crustal source with a predominantly crustal component. This study confirms that the northern Eastern Yidun arc exists Late Triassic Cu-Mo metallogenesis, and thus much attention should be paid on this region to find more Late Triassic Cu-Mo resources.