Petia Georgieva

Dr. Petia Georgieva

DETI/IEETA, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 June 2016 in Neural Networks
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLachezar Bozhkov
Lachezar Bozhkov
Petia Koprinkova-HristovaPetia Koprinkova-Hristova
Petia Koprinkova-Hristova
Petia GeorgievaPetia Georgieva
Petia Georgieva

1 May 2005 in Computers & Chemical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASA. Simoglou
A. Simoglou
Petia GeorgievaPetia Georgieva
Petia Georgieva
EME.B. Martin
E.B. Martin
AMA.J. Morris
A.J. Morris
SAS. Feyo de Azevedo
S. Feyo de Azevedo

1 March 2017 in Neurocomputing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLachezar Bozhkov
Lachezar Bozhkov
Petia Koprinkova-HristovaPetia Koprinkova-Hristova
Petia Koprinkova-Hristova
Petia GeorgievaPetia Georgieva
Petia Georgieva

28 February 2022 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RLRúben Miguel Borges Lourenço
Rúben Miguel Borges Lourenço
AAAntónio Andrade-Campos
António Andrade-Campos
Petia GeorgievaPetia Georgieva
Petia Georgieva
Accurate numerical simulations require constitutive models capable of providing precise material data. Several calibration methodologies have been developed to improve the accuracy of constitutive models. Nevertheless, a model’s performance is always constrained by its mathematical formulation. Machine learning (ML) techniques, such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), have the potential to overcome these limitations. Nevertheless, the use of ML for material constitutive modelling is very recent and not fully explored. Difficulties related to data requirements and training are still open problems. This work explores and discusses the use of ML techniques regarding the accuracy of material constitutive models in metal plasticity, particularly contributing (i) a parameter identification inverse methodology, (ii) a constitutive model corrector, (iii) a data-driven constitutive model using empirical known concepts and (iv) a general implicit constitutive model using a data-driven learning approach. These approaches are discussed, and examples are given in the framework of non-linear elastoplasticity. To conveniently train these ML approaches, a large amount of data concerning material behaviour must be used. Therefore, non-homogeneous strain field and complex strain path tests measured with digital image correlation (DIC) techniques must be used for that purpose.

21 December 2004 in International Journal of Intelligent Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IBIeroham S. Baruch
Ieroham S. Baruch
Petia GeorgievaPetia Georgieva
Petia Georgieva
JBJosefina Barrera-Cortes
Josefina Barrera-Cortes
SASebastiao Feyo de Azevedo
Sebastiao Feyo de Azevedo