Psychological therapies, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, are widely used multifaceted approaches that have been shown to improve pain-related functioning. A small but growing number of studies have used brain imaging to support the use of psychological therapies for pain. Although these studies have led to an increased understanding of how therapies may engage neural systems, there are multiple technical and conceptual challenges to consider. Based on the current literature, several components of effective psychological therapies for pain may be supported by changes in neural circuitry, which are most consistently represented by diminished activation and/or reduced hyperconnectivity in brain regions related to pain processing, emotion, and cognitive control. Findings may vary based on methodological approaches used and may also differ depending on targets of treatment. To provide a nuanced understanding of the current literature, specific targets and components of effective treatments for which a neural basis has been investigated are reviewed. These treatment components include catastrophic thinking about pain, increasing self-efficacy, mindfulness, anxiety symptom reduction, and exposure-based approaches. In general, such strategies have the potential to normalize regional hyperactivations and reduce hyperconnectivity in brain regions associated with nociceptive processing, cognition, and emotion, although additional research is needed. By determining if there are indeed distinct brain mechanisms engaged by different components of psychological therapy and evidence for specific changes in neural function after these interventions, future therapies may be more optimally tailored for individuals afflicted with chronic pain.
1 February 2022 in Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America
Objective: Pediatric rheumatologic diseases (PRDs) are characterized by high rates of anxiety and depression known to impact health‐related outcomes. We present guidance statements to assess and manage mental health concerns for youth with PRDs in pediatric rheumatology practice.Methods: Development of the guidance statements was initiated in 2019 and concluded in November 2023. It included (1) the formation of a task force (including pediatric rheumatologists, pediatric behavioral health providers, patients, and parents) led by two licensed pediatric psychologists and two board‐certified pediatric rheumatologists, (2) iterative drafting of statements and rating of evidence based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine levels of evidence, (3) an open comment period followed by revision of statements, (4) a Delphi panel process to attain consensus on the statements, and (5) review by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Committee on Quality of Care and refinement of statements to an identified list of those with the strongest empiric evidence for endorsement by the ACR.Results: The task force drafted 34 statements for addressing mental health concerns in pediatric rheumatology, including identification, management, and clinic environment/education considerations. After two rounds of Delphi panel voting by a random sample of 76 members of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance, 31 statements attained at least 80% consensus. Eleven of those statements had high empirical support and endorsement and were thus selected as the final guidance statements, including recommendations for depression and anxiety screening in youth aged 12 years and older, management of identified symptoms, and education of patients about mental health.Conclusion: It is a goal that these recommendations be used to empower pediatric rheumatology teams to consider how they may better address mental health concerns in their setting and help improve both mental health– and health‐related outcomes for youth with rheumatologic diseases. image
Youth with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) may report high rates of trauma and/or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which could impact both physical and psychosocial functioning, in addition to psychosocial treatment response. The current study aimed to examine the rates of PTSD in a sample of 89 youth with FAPDs and examine the association between PTSD with physical and psychosocial functioning. The impact of PTSD on psychosocial treatment response in a subsample of youth with FAPDs was also explored. Participants were youth with FAPDs (ages 9–14) enrolled in a larger study examining the effect of a short-term pain and anxiety focused cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) treatment (Aim to Decrease Anxiety and Pain Treatment (ADAPT)) for youth with FAPDs. Youth were administered a semi-structured diagnostic interview by a trained clinician to confirm the presence of psychological diagnoses, including PTSD. Measures of physical and psychosocial functioning were also completed. Results revealed a high rate of PTSD in youth with FAPDs with 12.4% meeting diagnostic criteria for the disorder. PTSD was associated with several indicators of increased psychosocial impairment and one indicator of physical impairment. Exploratory analyses revealed comorbid PTSD may impact response to a brief CBT intervention targeting pain and anxiety, but more rigorous controlled studies are needed.