New treatments are needed to combat the worldwide increase in resistance to antituberculosis drugs.
1 The outlook for patients with tuberculosis who do not show a response to the key agents used in treatment — isoniazid, rifampin, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides — is grim and reminiscent of the plight of patients with cancer in the era before chemotherapy.
2 New agents are emerging, but the obligatory evaluation of their safety and efficacy in combination with other antituberculosis and antiretroviral agents slows the pace of progress. Repurposing or combining commercially available products may offer a faster track to new antituberculosis regimens. For many decades, the hurdle of genetically encoded β-lactamase in
Mycobacterium tuberculosis was considered insurmountable in clinical practice, a view that was supported by two unsuccessful clinical trials with amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, one conducted in the United States and Turkey
3 and one in South Africa.
4 The World Health Organization currently lists amoxicillin–clavulanic acid as a third-line (and last-line) agent with unclear efficacy.
1