BACKGROUND:. Adjacent segment disease is an important complication after fusion of degenerative lumbar spines. However, the role of body mass index (BMI

BACKGROUND:. The Rotterdam computed tomography (CT) score was developed for prognostic purposes in traumatic brain injury (TBI).OBJECTIVE:. To examine t

Bilateral chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is not uncommon, although information on this condition is limited. We aim to identify the differences in clinical characteristics between patients with bilateral or unilateral CSDH. Ninety-eight patients with CSDH were enrolled in the two-year retrospective study. We investigated neurological outcome, morbidity, mortality, and recurrences after burr hole craniostomy for CSDH. Bilateral convexity hematomas were identified in 25 of 98 CSDH (25.51%). The patients with bilateral lesions had a lower incidence of hemiparesis than those having unilateral lesions (p = 0.004). Analysis of the neuro-images revealed significant differences in the presence of a midline shift (p = 0.001) and thickness of the hematoma (p < 0.001). The mean Markwalder subdural hematoma grade at admission was 1.89 ± 0.66 and 1.64 ± 0.49 in the unilateral and bilateral hematoma groups, respectively (p = 0.010). After a minimum follow-up period of 6 months, the mean Glasgow Outcome Scale was not significantly different (p = 0.060). The recurrence rate of up to 28.00% observed for the bilateral disease was found to be higher than 9.59% observed for the unilateral disease (p = 0.042). The frequency of focal neurological deficits was found to be lesser in patients with bilateral CSDH, and it may confound the diagnosis and delay treatment. To prevent neurological deterioration resulting from the thicker hematomas, early surgical decompression for bilateral CSDH should be implemented. Additionally, clinicians must be aware of the higher recurrent rate of bilateral CSDH after burr hole craniostomy.

With the use of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury (TBI) come a corresponding number of cranioplasties. TBI causes dynamic processes to commence or change during the period from injury to recovery; hence, the role of the timing of surgical intervention should be emphasized. We attempt to identify the relationship between the timing of cranioplasty and neurological outcomes following posttraumatic craniectomy. In this 3-year retrospective study, 105 patients undergoing decompressive craniectomies and subsequent cranioplasties for TBI were enrolled. We documented the patients' demographic information, including Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at admission for trauma. The follow-up period was terminated by death or a minimum of 6 months after TBI. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at the end of follow-up was used as an outcome measure. Unfavorable outcome was defined as a GOS score of 1-3. The 105 patients included 71 male and 34 female subjects. The mean age was 41.94 ± 19.73 years. Neurological assessment showed that admission GCS was 8.50 ± 3.15, on average. The mean time interval between cranioplasty and craniectomy was 78.84 ± 49.04 days (range, 13-245 days). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the association between the timing of cranioplasty and unfavorable outcomes was not statistically significant (odds ratio = 1.005, confidence interval 0.997-1.013; p = 0.195). The timing of cranioplasty following posttraumatic craniectomy was not related to the neurological outcomes of TBI. Despite the limitations of the retrospective design, the analyses provide preliminary information to elucidate the question.