Sustaining and maintaining the intricate process of spermatogenesis is liable upon hormones and growth factors acting through endocrine and paracrine pathways. The Sertoli cells (SCs) are the major somatic cells present in the seminiferous tubules and are considered to be the main regulators of spermatogenesis. As each Sertoli cell supports a specific number of germ cells, thus, the final number of Sertoli cells determines the sperm production capacity. Similarly, sex hormones are also major regulators of spermatogenesis and they can determine the proliferation of Sertoli cells. In the present review, we have critically and comprehensively discussed the role of sex hormones and some other factors that are involved in Sertoli cell proliferation, differentiation and maturation. Furthermore, we have also presented a model of Sertoli cell development based upon the recent advancement in the field of reproduction. Hence, our review article provides a general overview regarding the sex hormonal pathways governing Sertoli cell proliferation and development.

Sperm head shaping is a key event in spermiogenesis and is tightly controlled via the acrosome–manchette network. Linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complexes consist of Sad1 and UNC84 domain–containing (SUN) and Klarsicht/ANC-1/Syne-1 homology (KASH) domain proteins and form conserved nuclear envelope bridges implicated in transducing mechanical forces from manchette to sculpt the sperm nuclei into a hook-like shape. However, the role of LINC complexes in sperm head shaping is still poorly understood. Here, we assessed the role of SUN3, a testis-specific LINC component harboring a conserved SUN domain, in spermiogenesis. We show that CRISPR/Cas9-generated Sun3-knockout male mice are infertile, displaying drastically reduced sperm counts and a globozoospermia-like phenotype, including a missing, mislocalized, or fragmented acrosome, as well as multiple defects in sperm flagella. Further examinations revealed that the sperm head abnormalities are apparent at step 9 and that the sperm nuclei fail to elongate because of the absence of manchette microtubules and perinuclear rings. These observations indicated that Sun3 deletion likely impairs the ability of the LINC complex to transduce the cytoskeletal force to the nuclear envelope required for sperm head elongation. We also found that SUN3 interacts with SUN4 in mouse testes and that the level of SUN4 proteins is drastically reduced in Sun3-null mice. Altogether, our results indicate that SUN3 is essential for sperm head shaping and male fertility, providing molecular clues to the underlying pathology of the globozoospermia-like phenotype.

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), characterized by spermatogenesis failure and the absence of sperm in ejaculation, is the most severe form of male infertility. However, the etiology and pathology between meiosis-associated monogenic alterations and human NOA remain largely unknown. A homozygous MSH5 mutation (c.1126del) was identified from two idiopathic NOA patients in the consanguineous family. This mutation led to the degradation of MSH5 mRNA and abolished chromosome axial localization of MutSγ in spermatocytes from the affected males. Chromosomal spreading analysis of the patient’s meiotic prophase I revealed that the meiosis progression was arrested at a zygotene-like stage with extensive failure of homologous synapsis and DSB repair. Therefore, our study demonstrates that the MSH5 c.1126del could cause meiotic recombination failure and lead to human infertility, improving the genetic diagnosis of NOA clinically. Furthermore, the study of human spermatocytes elucidates the meiosis defects caused by MSH5 variant, and reveals a conserved and indispensable role of MutSγ in human synapsis and meiotic recombination, which have not previously been well-described.

Meiosis is essential for the generation of gametes and sexual reproduction, yet the factors and underlying mechanisms regulating meiotic progression remain largely unknown. Here, we showed that MTL5 translocates into nuclei of spermatocytes during zygotene-pachytene transition and ensures meiosis advances beyond pachytene stage. MTL5 shows strong interactions with MuvB core complex components, a well-known transcriptional complex regulating mitotic progression, and the zygotene-pachytene transition of MTL5 is mediated by its direct interaction with the component LIN9, through MTL5 C-terminal 443–475 residues. Male Mtl5^c-mu/c-mu mice expressing the truncated MTL5 (p.Ser445Arg fs*3) that lacks the interaction with LIN9 and is detained in cytoplasm showed male infertility and spermatogenic arrest at pachytene stage, same as that of Mtl5 knockout mice, indicating that the interaction with LIN9 is essential for the nuclear translocation and function of MTL5 during meiosis. Our data demonstrated MTL5 translocates into nuclei during the zygotene-pachytene transition to initiate its function along with the MuvB core complex in pachytene spermatocytes, highlighting a new mechanism regulating the progression of male meiosis.

CCND1 encodes for Cyclin D1 protein and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can modulate its activity. In the current study, the impact of CCND1 SNPs on structure and/or function of cyclin D1 protein using in silico tools was investigated. Our analysis revealed only one splice site SNP (c.1988+5G<A) can effect CCND1 function. Subsequently, 78 out of 169 missense variants were predicted as pathogenic by Polyphen2, SIFT, PROVEAN, SNP & GO and PANTHER, and 4/78 missense SNPs were further evaluated because these four SNPs were found to be reside in highly conserved region of cyclin D1. However, they did not show any major impact on tertiary structure and domain of cyclin D1 but overall R15S and A190S has displayed a significant diseased phenotype and an altered molecular mechanism predicted by MutPred, FATHMM, SNPeffect, SNAP2, and PredictSNP. Consistently, A190S, R179L and R15S may also cause a decrease in stability of cyclin D1 anticipated by I-Mutant, HOPE and SNPeffect. Furthermore, the Kaplan-Meier plotter has explained that high expression of CCND1 is associated with less survival rate of breast cancer patients. Altogether, our study suggests that c.1988+5G<A, R15S, R179L and A190S SNPs could directly or indirectly destabilize cyclin D1.