Kevin Wang

Kevin Wang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2017 in The Lancet Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAndrew I R Maas
Andrew I R Maas
DMDavid K Menon
David K Menon
PAP David Adelson
P David Adelson
NANada Andelic
Nada Andelic
MBMichael J Bell
Michael J Bell
FZFabrizio Zumbo
Fabrizio Zumbo

1 June 2015 in Trends in Neurosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZYZhihui Yang
Zhihui Yang
KWKevin Wang
Kevin Wang

1 January 2000 in Trends in Neurosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KWKevin Wang
Kevin Wang

28 December 2017 in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KWKevin Wang
Kevin Wang
ZYZhihui Yang
Zhihui Yang
TZTian Zhu
Tian Zhu
YSYuan Shi
Yuan Shi
RRRichard Rubenstein
Richard Rubenstein
GMGeoff T. Manley
Geoff T. Manley
Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major worldwide neurological disorder of epidemic proportions. To date, there are still no FDA-approved therapies to treat any forms of TBI. Encouragingly, there are emerging data showing that biofluid-based TBI biomarker tests have the potential to diagnose the presence of TBI of different severities including concussion, and to predict outcome. Areas covered: The authors provide an update on the current knowledge of TBI biomarkers, including protein biomarkers for neuronal cell body injury (UCH-L1, NSE), astroglial injury (GFAP, S100B), neuronal cell death (αII-spectrin breakdown products), axonal injury (NF proteins), white matter injury (MBP), post-injury neurodegeneration (total Tau and phospho-Tau), post-injury autoimmune response (brain antigen-targeting autoantibodies), and other emerging non-protein biomarkers. The authors discuss biomarker evidence in TBI diagnosis, outcome prognosis and possible identification of post-TBI neurodegernative diseases (e.g. chronic traumatic encephalopathy and Alzheimer’s disease), and as theranostic tools in pre-clinical and clinical settings. Expert commentary: A spectrum of biomarkers is now at or near the stage of formal clinical validation of their diagnostic and prognostic utilities in the management of TBI of varied severities including concussions. TBI biomarkers could serve as a theranostic tool in facilitating drug development and treatment monitoring.

1 October 2019 in The Lancet Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ESEwout W Steyerberg
Ewout W Steyerberg
EWEveline Wiegers
Eveline Wiegers
CSCharlie Sewalt
Charlie Sewalt
ABAndras Buki
Andras Buki
GCGiuseppe Citerio
Giuseppe Citerio
TZTommaso Zoerle
Tommaso Zoerle
The burden of traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses a large public health and societal problem, but the characteristics of patients and their care pathways in Europe are poorly understood. We aimed to characterise patient case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes of TBI. CENTER-TBI is a Europe-based, observational cohort study, consisting of a core study and a registry. Inclusion criteria for the core study were a clinical diagnosis of TBI, presentation fewer than 24 h after injury, and an indication for CT. Patients were differentiated by care pathway and assigned to the emergency room (ER) stratum (patients who were discharged from an emergency room), admission stratum (patients who were admitted to a hospital ward), or intensive care unit (ICU) stratum (patients who were admitted to the ICU). Neuroimages and biospecimens were stored in repositories and outcome was assessed at 6 months after injury. We used the IMPACT core model for estimating the expected mortality and proportion with unfavourable Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) outcomes in patients with moderate or severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤12). The core study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02210221, and with Resource Identification Portal (RRID: SCR_015582). Data from 4509 patients from 18 countries, collected between Dec 9, 2014, and Dec 17, 2017, were analysed in the core study and from 22 782 patients in the registry. In the core study, 848 (19%) patients were in the ER stratum, 1523 (34%) in the admission stratum, and 2138 (47%) in the ICU stratum. In the ICU stratum, 720 (36%) patients had mild TBI (GCS score 13-15). Compared with the core cohort, the registry had a higher proportion of patients in the ER (9839 [43%]) and admission (8571 [38%]) strata, with more than 95% of patients classified as having mild TBI. Patients in the core study were older than those in previous studies (median age 50 years [IQR 30-66], 1254 [28%] aged >65 years), 462 (11%) had serious comorbidities, 772 (18%) were taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication, and alcohol was contributory in 1054 (25%) TBIs. MRI and blood biomarker measurement enhanced characterisation of injury severity and type. Substantial inter-country differences existed in care pathways and practice. Incomplete recovery at 6 months (GOSE <8) was found in 207 (30%) patients in the ER stratum, 665 (53%) in the admission stratum, and 1547 (84%) in the ICU stratum. Among patients with moderate-to-severe TBI in the ICU stratum, 623 (55%) patients had unfavourable outcome at 6 months (GOSE <5), similar to the proportion predicted by the IMPACT prognostic model (observed to expected ratio 1·06 [95% CI 0·97-1·14]), but mortality was lower than expected (0·70 [0·62-0·76]). Patients with TBI who presented to European centres in the core study were older than were those in previous observational studies and often had comorbidities. Overall, most patients presented with mild TBI. The incomplete recovery of many patients should motivate precision medicine research and the identification of best practices to improve these outcomes. European Union 7th Framework Programme, the Hannelore Kohl Stiftung, OneMind, and Integra LifeSciences Corporation.

1 September 2019 in JAMA Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LNLindsay D. Nelson
Lindsay D. Nelson
NTNancy R. Temkin
Nancy R. Temkin
SDSureyya Dikmen
Sureyya Dikmen
JBJason Barber
Jason Barber
JGJoseph T. Giacino
Joseph T. Giacino
RZRoss Zafonte
Ross Zafonte
In the United States, about 2.8 million individuals are treated at hospitals annually for traumatic brain injuries (TBIs).1 Most TBIs are classified as mild (mTBI) based on crude clinical signs, such as patients’ gross levels of consciousness up hospital admission (eg, Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] scores of 13-15). Although it is well accepted that moderate to severe TBIs may cause permanent disability,2-4 controversy exists surrounding the expected course of clinical recovery for patients with mTBI. In particular, although mTBI commonly causes acute symptoms,5-7 cognitive dysfunction,6,8-12 and problems in day-to-day functioning,13 findings vary as to whether patients continue to manifest sequelae of mTBI months to years postinjury.14-16