Probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) of nuclear facilities on external multi-hazards has become a major issue after the Fukushima accident in 2011. However, the existing external hazard PSA methodology is for single hazard events and cannot cover the impact of multi-hazards. Therefore, this study proposes a methodology for quantifying multi-hazard risks for nuclear energy plants. Specifically, we developed an efficient multi-hazard PSA methodology based on the probability distribution-based Boolean algebraic approach and sampling-based method, which are currently single-hazard PSA methodologies. The limitations of the probability distribution-based Boolean algebraic approach not being able to handle partial dependencies between the components are solved through this sampling-based method. In addition, we devised an algorithm that was more efficient than the existing algorithm for improving the limits of the current sampling-based method, as it required a significant computational time. The proposed methodology was applied from simple examples to single- and multi-hazard PSA examples of actual nuclear power plants. The results showed that the proposed methodology was verified in terms of accuracy and efficiency perspectives. Regarding the sampling-based method, it was confirmed that the proposed algorithm yielded fragility and risk results that have similar degrees of accuracy, even though it extracted a smaller number of samples than the existing algorithm.

Ground motion response spectra (GMRS) at rock/soil sites in regions where earthquake ground motions have dominant contents at high frequencies of 10 Hz or more are evaluated and the effects of soil amplification on the GMRS are studied. The seismic hazard levels at the soil sites are estimated from soil amplification functions and hazard curves for rock outcrop motions. The soil amplification functions are obtained using modified earthquake ground motions which match the uniform hazard response spectra (UHRS) for rock outcrop motions with various mean annual frequencies of exceedance in order to consider the effects of earthquake ground motions consistently in a site response analysis. UHRS at soil sites are determined from the calculated seismic hazard curves. Subsequently, design factors, which will be applied to UHRS, and the corresponding GMRS are evaluated such that the seismic risk for the structures, systems, and components of nuclear facilities would be equal to a target seismic risk. It can be observed from example applications that the UHRS and GMRS at soil sites have peaks at the natural frequencies of the soil, where the soil responses are amplified. Amplification at soil sites depends on the frequency contents of rock outcrop motions.

When a seismic force acts on bridges, the pier can be damaged by the horizontal inertia force of the superstructure. To prevent this failure, criteria for seismic reinforcement details have been developed in many design codes. However, in moderate seismicity regions, many existing bridges were constructed without considering seismic detail because the detailed seismic design code was only applied recently. These existing structures should be retrofitted by evaluating their seismic performance. Even if the seismic design criteria are not applied, it cannot be concluded that the structure does not have adequate seismic performance. In particular, the performance of a lap-spliced reinforcement bar at a construction joint applied by past practices cannot be easily evaluated analytically. Therefore, experimental tests on the bridge piers considering a non-seismic detail of existing structures need to be performed to evaluate the seismic performance. For this reason, six small scale specimens according to existing bridge piers were constructed and seismic performances were evaluated experimentally. The three types of reinforcement detail were adjusted, including a lap-splice for construction joints. Quasi-static loading tests were performed for three types of scale model with two-column piers in both the longitudinal and transverse directions. From the test results, the effect on the failure mechanism of the lap-splice and transverse reinforcement ratio were investigated. The difference in failure characteristics according to the loading direction was investigated by the location of plastic hinges. Finally, the seismic capacity related to the displacement ductility factor and the absorbed energy by hysteresis behavior for each test were obtained and discussed.

To secure the seismic performance of structures, seismic risk assessment is necessary to quantify safety against beyond-design-based earthquakes and seismic design. For the seismic risk assessment of structures, the input ground motions corresponding to the seismic intensity for evaluation are required as seismic loads, which must reflect the tectonic characteristics and site conditions. In this study, ground motions recorded in regions of low to moderate seismicity were used to generate examples of input ground motions for seismic risk assessment. A uniform hazard spectrum (UHS) was used as the target spectrum for risk assessment, following the guidelines. The magnitude and distance parameters of the scenario earthquake for seismic risk assessment were determined via hazard de-aggregation. The empirical Green’s function method (EGFM) was used to match the ground motion recorded at the site with the seismic intensity required for seismic risk assessment. In addition, a spectral matching process was applied to ensure that the input ground motion was compatible with the response spectrum used in seismic risk assessment. In this process, the convergence characteristics of the spectral matching to the target spectrum were analyzed. Consequently, the spectral conditions for selecting the ground motion for the seismic risk assessment were determined.