Jane Speight

Prof. Jane Speight

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2018 in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSudesna Chatterjee
Sudesna Chatterjee
MDMelanie J Davies
Melanie J Davies
SHSimon Heller
Simon Heller
JSJane Speight
Jane Speight
FSFrank J Snoek
Frank J Snoek
KKKamlesh Khunti
Kamlesh Khunti

9 January 2016 in Current Diabetes Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VHVirginia Hagger
Virginia Hagger
CHChristel Hendrieckx
Christel Hendrieckx
JSJackie Sturt
Jackie Sturt
TSTimothy Skinner
Timothy Skinner
JSJane Speight
Jane Speight

16 January 2013 in The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJasmin Schabert
Jasmin Schabert
JBJessica L. Browne
Jessica L. Browne
KMKylie Mosely
Kylie Mosely
JSJane Speight
Jane Speight

18 November 2013 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJessica L Browne
Jessica L Browne
AVAdriana Ventura
Adriana Ventura
KMKylie Mosely
Kylie Mosely
JSJane Speight
Jane Speight
Objectives While health-related stigma has been the subject of considerable research in other conditions (obesity and HIV/AIDS), it has not received substantial attention in diabetes. The aim of the current study was to explore the social experiences of Australian adults living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with a particular focus on the perception and experience of diabetes-related stigma. Design A qualitative study using semistructured interviews, which were audio recorded, transcribed and subject to thematic analysis. Setting This study was conducted in non-clinical settings in metropolitan and regional areas in the Australian state of Victoria. Participants were recruited primarily through the state consumer organisation representing people with diabetes. Participants All adults aged ≥18 years with T2DM living in Victoria were eligible to take part. Twenty-five adults with T2DM participated (12 women; median age 61 years; median diabetes duration 5 years). Results A total of 21 (84%) participants indicated that they believed T2DM was stigmatised, or reported evidence of stigmatisation. Specific themes about the experience of stigma were feeling blamed by others for causing their own condition, being subject to negative stereotyping, being discriminated against or having restricted opportunities in life. Other themes focused on sources of stigma, which included the media, healthcare professionals, friends, family and colleagues. Themes relating to the consequences of this stigma were also evident, including participants’ unwillingness to disclose their condition to others and psychological distress. Participants believed that people with type 1 diabetes do not experience similar stigmatisation. Conclusions Our study found evidence of people with T2DM experiencing and perceiving diabetes-related social stigma. Further research is needed to explore ways to measure and minimise diabetes-related stigma at the individual and societal levels, and also to explore perceptions and experiences of stigma in people with type 1 diabetes.

1 September 2002 in Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBClare Bradley
Clare Bradley
JSJane Speight
Jane Speight

12 July 2014 in Diabetes Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLStuart A. Little
Stuart A. Little
LLLalantha H. Leelarathna
Lalantha H. Leelarathna
EWEmma Walkinshaw
Emma Walkinshaw
HTHorng Kai Tan
Horng Kai Tan
OCOlivia Chapple
Olivia Chapple
JSJames A.M. Shaw
James A.M. Shaw
OBJECTIVE To determine whether impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) can be improved and severe hypoglycemia (SH) prevented in type 1 diabetes, we compared an insulin pump (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) with multiple daily injections (MDIs) and adjuvant real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT) with conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A 24-week 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial in adults with type 1 diabetes and IAH was conducted. All received comparable education, support, and congruent therapeutic targets aimed at rigorous avoidance of biochemical hypoglycemia without relaxing overall control. Primary end point was between-intervention difference in 24-week hypoglycemia awareness (Gold score). RESULTS A total of 96 participants (mean diabetes duration 29 years) were randomized. Overall, biochemical hypoglycemia (≤3.0 mmol/L) decreased (53 ± 63 to 24 ± 56 min/24 h; P = 0.004 [t test]) without deterioration in HbA1c. Hypoglycemia awareness improved (5.1 ± 1.1 to 4.1 ± 1.6; P = 0.0001 [t test]) with decreased SH (8.9 ± 13.4 to 0.8 ± 1.8 episodes/patient-year; P = 0.0001 [t test]). At 24 weeks, there was no significant difference in awareness comparing CSII with MDI (4.1 ± 1.6 vs. 4.2 ± 1.7; difference 0.1; 95% CI −0.6 to 0.8) and RT with SMBG (4.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.0 ± 1.7; difference −0.3; 95% CI −1.0 to 0.4). Between-group analyses demonstrated comparable reductions in SH, fear of hypoglycemia, and insulin doses with equivalent HbA1c. Treatment satisfaction was higher with CSII than MDI (32 ± 3 vs. 29 ± 6; P = 0.0003 [t test]), but comparable with SMBG and RT (30 ± 5 vs. 30 ± 5; P = 0.79 [t test]). CONCLUSIONS Hypoglycemia awareness can be improved and recurrent SH prevented in long-standing type 1 diabetes without relaxing HbA1c. Similar biomedical outcomes can be attained with conventional MDI and SMBG regimens compared with CSII/RT, although satisfaction was higher with CSII.