Jiaming Wen

Prof. Jiaming Wen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 July 2022 in Cell Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZhilin Long
Zhilin Long
CSChengfang Sun
Chengfang Sun
MTMin Tang
Min Tang
YWYin Wang
Yin Wang
JMJiayan Ma
Jiayan Ma
JWJiaming Wen
Jiaming Wen
The clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) microenvironment consists of many different cell types and structural components that play critical roles in cancer progression and drug resistance, but the cellular architecture and underlying gene regulatory features of ccRCC have not been fully characterized. Here, we applied single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and single-cell assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (scATAC-seq) to generate transcriptional and epigenomic landscapes of ccRCC. We identified tumor cell-specific regulatory programs mediated by four key transcription factors (TFs) (HOXC5, VENTX, ISL1, and OTP), and these TFs have prognostic significance in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Targeting these TFs via short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) or small molecule inhibitors decreased tumor cell proliferation. We next performed an integrative analysis of chromatin accessibility and gene expression for CD8+ T cells and macrophages to reveal the different regulatory elements in their subgroups. Furthermore, we delineated the intercellular communications mediated by ligand–receptor interactions within the tumor microenvironment. Taken together, our multiomics approach further clarifies the cellular heterogeneity of ccRCC and identifies potential therapeutic targets.

10 September 2019 in Urolithiasis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BWBohan Wang
Bohan Wang
GHGaofei He
Gaofei He
GXGang Xu
Gang Xu
JWJiaming Wen
Jiaming Wen
XYXiao Yu
Xiao Yu

18 March 2025 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JXJinming Xu
Jinming Xu
JXJiaju Xu
Jiaju Xu
CSChengfang Sun
Chengfang Sun
XHXuhong He
Xuhong He
YSYichang Shu
Yichang Shu
BWBo-Han Wang
Bo-Han Wang
The molecular complexity of bladder cancer restricts reliance on single-feature or single-gene targeted therapies, necessitating integrated individualized treatments and multi-gene interventions. In this study, we introduced the CRISPR/dCas9-SAM system to BCa treatment, known for its high specificity, low off-target effects, and reduced genetic toxicity, making it ideal for multiplexed gene activation at minimal cost-just 20 nucleotides per target. However, despite its potential in complex gene therapy and cellular engineering, challenges persist due to safety concerns associated with viral vectors and the risk of off-target effects during in vivo delivery, necessitating the development of new vectors. Herein, we reported pH-sensitive hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles modified with PLZ4 ligands (PLZ4-Lip@AMSN/CRISPR/dCas9-SAM, PLACS NPs) for precise targeting of bladder tumors and co-delivery of CRISPR/dCas9-SAM system. With good stability and high plasmid loading capacity, they efficiently co-delivered dCas9-VP64, MS2-P65-HSF1, and sgRNA. Compared to Lipofectamine 3000, these nanoparticles exhibited superior lysosomal escape capability, significantly enhancing transfection efficiency in bladder cancer cells. Moreover, PLACS NPs simultaneously activated the expression of four target genes, inhibiting proliferation and migration, and promoting apoptosis in bladder cancer cells. In vivo, they achieved efficient gene editing at tumor sites, significantly inhibiting bladder tumor growth. Real-time imaging revealed their substantial accumulation and prolonged retention at bladder tumor sites without significant liver targeting and major organ damage, showcasing good specificity and biosafety. This study overcomes in vivo delivery challenges of multi-component CRISPR/dCas9 systems, enabling precise gene editing and anti-tumor effects, presenting an innovative strategy for targeted therapy in bladder cancer treatment. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This study introduces a newly-developed approach to address key challenges in bladder cancer gene therapy, namely low gene upregulation efficiency, limited targeting specificity, and inefficient nucleic acid delivery. By integrating the CRISPR/dCas9-SAM system, we achieve highly specific gene activation with minimal off-target effects, enabling the addition of treatment targets with just 20 nucleotides per target. To improve bladder cancer targeting, we developed PLACS NPs, a mesoporous silica nanoparticle system that enhances plasmid delivery, transfection efficiency, and endosomal escape. This system shows good tumor targeting and significant anti-tumor effects in bladder cancer, without significant liver targeting and major organ toxicity, offering promising therapeutic potential and broad clinical applications.

1 August 2020 in Annals of Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BWBohan Wang
Bohan Wang
SZShigeng Zhang
Shigeng Zhang
CSChengfang Sun
Chengfang Sun
CDChuanjun Du
Chuanjun Du
GHGaofei He
Gaofei He
JWJiaming Wen
Jiaming Wen
Background: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was considered the golden standard to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for decades. However, TURP was associated with low efficiency to alleviate the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and a significantly higher risk of bladder neck contracture (BNC) for patients with small-volume BPH. Our study aims to compare the therapeutic effect of a transurethral split of the prostate (TUSP) with TURP for patients with small-volume BPH (<30 mL). Methods: In this study, 101 small-volume BPH patients were randomly divided into two groups (TUSP and TURP group). The patient’s baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were recorded. The follow-up was done at six months, one year and two years after surgical treatment. Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups for the baseline characteristics, including age, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, concurrent disease, post-void residual (PVR), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), international prostate symptoms score (IPSS), and quality of life (QoL) score. The operative time and hemoglobin decrease were significantly lower in the TUSP group compared to the TURP group. However, no significant differences were observed between both groups for catheterization time, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of transurethral resection syndrome (TURS). However, of the late complications, the incidence of BNC in the TUSP group was significantly lower than the TURP group. No significant differences were found between both groups for other complications, including postoperative bleeding, micturition urgency, micturition frequency, micturition pain, urinary tract infection, recatheterization, transient incontinence, and continuous incontinence. Follow-up results showed that the IPSS of the TUSP group was significantly lower than the TURP group, while the Qmax of the TUSP group was significantly higher than the TURP group. Conclusions: This study shows that TUSP may be an efficient and safe treatment for small-volume BPH (<30 mL) with a lower incidence of postoperative BNC and better longtime clinical outcomes than TURP. It suggested that TUSP could be an ideal treatment choice for small-volume BPH.

1 July 2020 in International Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GHGaofei He
Gaofei He
CSChengfang Sun
Chengfang Sun
YSYuanyuan Shu
Yuanyuan Shu
BWBohan Wang
Bohan Wang
CDChuanjun Du
Chuanjun Du
JWJiaming Wen
Jiaming Wen
Background: To compare the diagnostic value of prostate cancer (PCa) between holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 2909 patients who underwent surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) from January 2008 to June 2018. A total of 1362 patients received HoLEP, and 1547 patients received TURP. The baseline patient characteristics were collected. We then compared the perioperative outcomes of these patients who diagnosed with incidentally diagnosed prostatic carcinoma (IDPC) or PCa after BPH surgeries. Results: The total detection rate of PCa in HoLEP group was higher than that in TURP group (85/6.24% vs. 61/3.94%, p = 0.005). Specifically, 55(4.6%) patients were diagnosed with IDPC in HoLEP group with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) less than 4 ng/ml, and 37(2.7%) patients in TURP group (p = 0.014). For the patients with PSA between 4 and 10 ng/ml, 15(13.9%) patients were diagnosed with PCa after HoLEP, and 6(5.0%) patients after TURP (p = 0.023). But the detection rate of PCa was not significantly different between the two groups when PSA was over 10 ng/ml. On the other hand, 57 in 1215 patients with no prostate biopsy pre-operatively were diagnosed with PCa after HoLEP, while 42 in 1370 patients after TURP (4.7% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.040), respectively. Twenty-six patients received once biopsy and diagnosed with PCa in HoLEP group, while 15 patients in TURP group (18.4% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.018), respectively. However, no significant difference was observed for patients who received twice prostate biopsy in the two groups. Conclusions: The present study showed that HoLEP can provide a higher total detection rate of PCa when compared with TURP. Besides, this superiority was especially embodied in patients with PSA less than 10 ng/ml.