Angèle Reinders

Prof. Dr. Angèle Reinders

1. Department of Design, Production and Management, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2011 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AEA.G. Entrop
A.G. Entrop
HBH.J.H. Brouwers
H.J.H. Brouwers
ARAngèle Reinders
Angèle Reinders

1 January 2003 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAngèle Reinders
Angèle Reinders
KVKees Vringer
Kees Vringer
KBKornelis Block
Kornelis Block

1 October 2013 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGDaphne Geelen
Daphne Geelen
ARAngèle Reinders
Angèle Reinders
DKDavid Keyson
David Keyson

15 June 2022 in Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Jeff KettleJeff Kettle
Jeff Kettle
Mohammadreza AghaeiMohammadreza Aghaei
Mohammadreza Aghaei
SAShahzada Ahmad
Shahzada Ahmad
AFAndrew Fairbrother
Andrew Fairbrother
Stuart James Curzon IrvineStuart James Curzon Irvine
Stuart James Curzon Irvine
MTMirjam J. Theelen
Mirjam J. Theelen
A comprehensive understanding of failure modes of solar photovoltaic (PV) modules is key to extending their operational lifetime in the field. In this review, first, specific failure modes associated with mature PV technologies, such as crystalline silicon (c‐Si), copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) and cadmium telluride (CdTe), are framed by sources of specific failure modes, their development from the early‐developmental stages onwards and their impact upon long term performance of PV modules. These failure modes are sorted by both PV technology and location of occurrence in PV modules, such as substrate, encapsulant, front and rear electrode, absorber and interlayers. The second part of the review is focused on emerging PV technologies, such as perovskites solar cells, dye sensitised and organic PVs, where due to their low to medium technology readiness levels, specific long‐term degradation mechanisms have not fully emerged, and most mechanisms are only partially understood. However, an in‐depth summary of the known stability challenges associated with each emerging PV technology is presented. Finally, in this paper, lessons learned from mature PV technologies are reviewed, and considerations are given in to how these might be applied to the further development of emerging technologies. Namely, any emerging PV technology must eventually pass industry‐standard qualification tests, while warranties for the lifetime of modern c‐Si‐based modules might be extended beyond the existing warranted life of 25 years.

22 January 2016 in Energy Science & Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GAGeorgia Apostolou
Georgia Apostolou
ARAngèle Reinders
Angèle Reinders
MVMartin Verwaal
Martin Verwaal
This article presents a simple comparative model which has been developed for the estimation of the performance of photovoltaic (PV) products' cells in indoor environments. The model predicts the performance of PV solar cells, as a function of the distance from a spectrum of artificial (fluorescent light, halogen light, and light‐emitting diodes) and natural light. It intends to support designers, while creating PV‐integrated products for indoor use. For the model's validation, PV cells of 12 commercially available PV‐powered products with power ranging from 0.8 to 4 mWp were tested indoors under artificial illumination and natural light. The model is based on the physical measurements of natural and artificial irradiance indoors, along with literature data of PV technologies under low irradiance conditions. The input data of the model are the surface of the solar cell (in m2), the wavelength‐dependent spectral response (SR) of the PV cell, the spectral irradiance indoors, and solar cell's distance from light sources. The model calculates solar cells' efficiency and power produced under the specific indoor conditions. If using the measured SR of a PV cell and the irradiance as measured indoors, the model can predict the performance of a PV product under mixed indoor light with a typical inaccuracy of around 25%, which is sufficient for a design process. Measurements revealed that under mixed indoor lighting of around 20 W/m2, the efficiency of solar cells in 12 commercially available PV products ranges between 5% and 6% for amorphous silicon (a‐Si) cells, 4–6% for multicrystalline silicon (mc‐Si) cells, and 5–7% for the monocrystalline silicon (c‐Si) cells.

1 April 2012 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TGT. Gorter
T. Gorter
ARAngèle Reinders
Angèle Reinders