Dongil Kwon

Prof. Dongil Kwon

Seoul National University

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 November 2011 in Journal of Materials Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMin-Jae Choi
Min-Jae Choi
SKSeung-Kyun Kang
Seung-Kyun Kang
IKIngeun Kang
Ingeun Kang
DKDongil Kwon
Dongil Kwon

19 April 2021 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJunsang Lee
Junsang Lee
KLKyungyul Lee
Kyungyul Lee
SLSeungha Lee
Seungha Lee
OKOh Min Kwon
Oh Min Kwon
WKWon-Ki Kang
Won-Ki Kang
DKDongil Kwon
Dongil Kwon
HY-80 and HY-100 steels, widely used in constructing large ocean vessels and submarine hulls, contain mixed microstructures of tempered bainite and martensite and provide high tensile strength and toughness. Weld integrity in HY steels has been studied to verify and optimize welding conditions. In this study, the T-joint weld coupons, HY80 and HY100, were fabricated from HY-80 and HY-100 steel plates with a thickness of 30 mm as base metals by submerged-arc welding. Flux-cored arc welding was performed on an additional welding coupon consisting of HY-100 to evaluate the effect of repair welds (HY100RP). Microstructures in the heat-affected zones (HAZ) were thoroughly analyzed by optical observation. Instrumented indentation testing, taking advantage of local characterization, was applied to assess the yield strength and the residual stress of the HAZ and base regions. The maximum hardness over 400 HV was found in the HAZ due to the high volume fraction of untempered martensite microstructure. The yield strength of the weld coupons was evaluated by indentation testing, and the results showed good agreement with the uniaxial tensile test (within 10% range). The three coupons showed similar indentation residual stress profiles on the top and bottom surfaces. The stress distribution of the HY100 coupon was comparable to the results from X-ray diffraction. HY100RP demonstrated increased tensile residual stress compared to the as-welded coupon due to the effect of the repair weld (323 and 103 MPa on the top and bottom surfaces). This study verifies the wide applicability of indentation testing in evaluating yield strength and residual stress.

25 March 2020 in Metals and Materials International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCchanghyun cho
changhyun cho
SCSeunghun Choi
Seunghun Choi
OKOh Min Kwon
Oh Min Kwon
SLSeungha Lee
Seungha Lee
JKJong-Hwan Kim
Jong-Hwan Kim
DKDongil Kwon
Dongil Kwon

20 June 2020 in Metals and Materials International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WKWoojoo Kim
Woojoo Kim
SCSeunghun Choi
Seunghun Choi
JKJunyeong Kim
Junyeong Kim
SJSeung-Won Jeon
Seung-Won Jeon
MCMin-Jae Choi
Min-Jae Choi
DKDongil Kwon
Dongil Kwon

1 June 2006 in Metals and Materials International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJu-Young Kim
Ju-Young Kim
SKSung-Hoon Kim
Sung-Hoon Kim
JLJung-Suk Lee
Jung-Suk Lee
KLKyung-Woo Lee
Kyung-Woo Lee
DKDongil Kwon
Dongil Kwon

26 May 2009 in Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EJEun-Chae Jeon
Eun-Chae Jeon
JPJoo-Seung Park
Joo-Seung Park
DCDoo-Sun Choi
Doo-Sun Choi
KKKug-Hwan Kim
Kug-Hwan Kim
DKDongil Kwon
Dongil Kwon
The instrumented indentation test, which measures indentation tensile properties, has attracted interest recently because this test can replace uniaxial tensile test. An international standard for instrumented indentation test has been recently legislated. However, the uncertainty of the indentation tensile properties has never been estimated. The indentation tensile properties cannot be obtained directly from experimental raw data as can the Brinell hardness, which makes estimation of the uncertainty difficult. The simplifying uncertainty estimation model for the indentation tensile properties proposed here overcomes this problem. Though the influence quantities are generally defined by experimental variances when estimating uncertainty, here they are obtained by calculation from indentation load-depth curves. This model was verified by round-robin test with several institutions. The average uncertainties were estimated as 18.9% and 9.8% for the indentation yield strength and indentation tensile strength, respectively. The values were independent of the materials’ mechanical properties but varied with environmental conditions such as experimental instruments and operators. The uncertainties for the indentation yield and tensile strengths were greater than those for the uniaxial tensile test. These larger uncertainties were caused by measuring local properties in the instrumented indentation test. The two tests had the same tendency to have smaller uncertainties for tensile strength than yield strength. These results suggest that the simplified model can be used to estimate the uncertainty in indentation tensile properties.