William I. Ford

Dr. William I. Ford


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2020 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAdmin Husic
Admin Husic
JFJames Fox
James Fox
EAEthan Adams
Ethan Adams
EPErik Pollock
Erik Pollock
WFWilliam I. Ford
William I. Ford
JBJason Backus
Jason Backus

4 March 2019 in Hydrological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WFWilliam I. Ford
William I. Ford
AHAdmin Husic
Admin Husic
AFAlex Fogle
Alex Fogle
JTJoseph Taraba
Joseph Taraba

1 November 2017 in Journal of Environmental Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WFWilliam I. Ford
William I. Ford
KKKevin W. King
Kevin W. King
MWMark R. Williams
Mark R. Williams
RCRemegio Confesor
Remegio Confesor

13 July 2017 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WFWilliam I. Ford
William I. Ford
JFJames F. Fox
James F. Fox
EPErik Pollock
Erik Pollock
The fate of bioavailable nitrogen species transported through agricultural landscapes remains highly uncertain given complexities of measuring fluxes impacting the fluvial N cycle. We present and test a new numerical model named Technology for Removable Annual Nitrogen in Streams For Ecosystem Restoration (TRANSFER), which aims to reduce model uncertainty due to erroneous parameterization, i.e., equifinality, in stream nitrogen cycle assessment and quantify the significance of transient and permanent removal pathways. TRANSFER couples nitrogen elemental and stable isotope mass‐balance equations with existing hydrologic, hydraulic, sediment transport, algal biomass, and sediment organic matter mass‐balance subroutines and a robust GLUE‐like uncertainty analysis. We test the model in an agriculturally impacted, third‐order stream reach located in the Bluegrass Region of Central Kentucky. Results of the multiobjective model evaluation for the model application highlight the ability of sediment nitrogen fingerprints including elemental concentrations and stable N isotope signatures to reduce equifinality of the stream N model. Advancements in the numerical simulations allow for illumination of the significance of algal sloughing fluxes for the first time in relation to denitrification. Broadly, model estimates suggest that denitrification is slightly greater than algal N sloughing (10.7% and 6.3% of dissolved N load on average), highlighting the potential for overestimation of denitrification by 37%. We highlight the significance of the transient N pool given the potential for the N store to be regenerated to the water column in downstream reaches, leading to harmful and nuisance algal bloom development.

27 December 2023 in Hydrological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWMark R. Williams
Mark R. Williams
WFWilliam I. Ford
William I. Ford
RMRose C. K. Mumbi
Rose C. K. Mumbi

1 November 2021 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPCiara Pickering
Ciara Pickering
WFWilliam I. Ford
William I. Ford