Kang Young Choi

Kang Young Choi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 September 2017 in Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJeong Woo Lee
Jeong Woo Lee
SCSeung Gyun Chu
Seung Gyun Chu
HKHak Tae Kim
Hak Tae Kim
KCKang Young Choi
Kang Young Choi
EOEunJung Oh
EunJung Oh
HCHo Yun Chung
Ho Yun Chung
Bone graft material should possess sufficient porosity and permeability to allow integration with native tissue and vascular invasion, and must satisfy oxygen and nutrient transport demands. In this study, we have examined the use of three-dimensional (3D)-printed polycaprolactone/tricalcium phosphate (PCL/TCP) composite material in bone grafting, to estimate the scope of its potential application in bone surgery. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) are known to enhance osteointegration. We hypothesized that a patient-specific 3D-printed solid scaffold could help preserve seeded ADSCs and BMSCs and enhance osteointegration. Diffuse osteogenic tissue formation was observed by micro-computed tomography with both stem cell types, and the ADSC group displayed similar osteogenesis compared to the BMSC group. In histological assessment, the scaffold pores showed abundant ossification in both groups. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) showed that the BMSC group had higher expression of genes associated with ossification, and this was confirmed by Western blot analysis. The ADSC- and BMSC-seeded 3D-printed PCL/TCP scaffolds displayed promising enhancement of osteogenesis in a dog model of maxillary bone defects.

1 May 2012 in Archives of Plastic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSeok-Kwun Kim
Seok-Kwun Kim
JKJu-Chan Kim
Ju-Chan Kim
JMJu-Bong Moon
Ju-Bong Moon
KLKeun-Cheol Lee
Keun-Cheol Lee
KCKang Young Choi
Kang Young Choi
BCByung Chae Cho
Byung Chae Cho
Background Maxillary hypoplasia refers to a deficiency in the growth of the maxilla commonly seen in patients with a repaired cleft palate. Those who develop maxillary hypoplasia can be offered a repositioning of the maxilla to a functional and esthetic position. Velopharyngeal dysfunction is one of the important problems affecting speech after maxillary advancement surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of maxillary advancement on repaired cleft palate patients without preoperative deterioration in speech compared with non-cleft palate patients. Methods Eighteen patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy between 2005 and 2011. One patient was excluded due to preoperative deterioration in speech. Eight repaired cleft palate patients belonged to group A, and 9 non-cleft palate patients belonged to group B. Speech assessments were performed preoperatively and postoperatively by using a speech screening protocol that consisted of a list of single words designed by Ok-Ran Jung. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine if there were significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative outcomes in each group A and B. And Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine if there were significant differences in the change of score between groups A and B. Results No patients had any noticeable change in speech production on perceptual assessment after maxillary advancement in our study. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between groups A and B. Conclusions Repaired cleft palate patients without preoperative velopharyngeal dysfunction would not have greater risk of deterioration of velopharyngeal function after maxillary advancement compared to non-cleft palate patients.

30 September 2016 in Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMin Sung Tak
Min Sung Tak
KCKang Young Choi
Kang Young Choi
SKSang Gue Kang
Sang Gue Kang
CKChul Han Kim
Chul Han Kim
DKDong Won Kim
Dong Won Kim
Primary cutaneous mucinous carcinoma (PCMC) is a rare low-grade malignant neoplasm derived from the eccrine glands. PCMC most commonly arises in the head and neck, with the eyelid being the most common site of origin. This case report describes a 51-year-old male with a painless, pigmented superficial nodular lesion over his right lower eyelid. The lesion was considered to be benign, and the initial treatment was simple excision with a 3-mm margin. However, histologic examination revealed the diagnosis of PCMC, and the patient underwent re-excision of the tumor site with an additional 3-mm margin from the initial scar. Histologic study of this second margin was free of any malignant cells. The patient experienced no postoperative complication or recurrence after 2 years. In our case, the skin lesion had benign morphologic findings and was strongly suspected to be a benign mass. Physicians should be aware of this tumor and be able to differentiate it from benign cystic or solid eyelid lesions.

20 April 2020 in Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BKByeongjun Kim
Byeongjun Kim
HKHyeong Seop Kim
Hyeong Seop Kim
YCYong Joon Chang
Yong Joon Chang
KKKee Hwan Kwon
Kee Hwan Kwon
KCKang Young Choi
Kang Young Choi
Oral mucosal melanoma is a very rare type of malignant melanoma, the characteristics of which differ from those of cutaneous melanoma. Primary amelanotic melanoma of the mandibular gingiva, which can invade the mandibular bone, is very rare worldwide. Here, we report a case in which we performed a reconstruction of the mandible and gingiva using the fibula osteocutaneous free flap procedure to treat a patient diagnosed with a primary amelanotic melanoma of the mandibular gingiva. The procedure was successful, and no recurrence was observed 10 months after surgery. Oral mucosal melanoma has a much poorer prognosis and a lower 5-year survival rate than cutaneous melanoma. However, recently, immunomodulatory therapies for mutations in melanocytic lesions have been used effectively to treat the increasing number of patients developing this type of melanoma, thus improving the prognosis of patients with oral mucosal melanoma.

1 July 2009 in American Journal of Otolaryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKChang Woo Kim
Chang Woo Kim
SOSo Jung Oh
So Jung Oh
YRYoung-Soo Rho
Young-Soo Rho
KCKang Young Choi
Kang Young Choi
EKEun Soek Koh
Eun Soek Koh
JKJeong Min Kang
Jeong Min Kang

23 December 2025 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TPTae Hwan Park
Tae Hwan Park
JMJoon Suk Moon
Joon Suk Moon
BKbyeongju kang
byeongju kang
JLJeeyeon Lee
Jeeyeon Lee
HPHo Yong Park
Ho Yong Park
JLJoon Seok Lee
Joon Seok Lee
Background/Objectives: Considering the increasing importance placed on the quality of life among those who survive cancer, breast reconstruction is no longer limited to only compensating for breast loss; achieving the patient’s preferences is now considered. However, the optimal surgical approach (subpectoral plane vs. prepectoral plane) in single-stage direct-to-implant breast reconstruction (DTIBR) has not been established. The aim of this study was to summarize the principles for selecting between the subpectoral and prepectoral planes in DTIBR. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 543 patients with breast cancer who underwent DTIBR between March 2018 and October 2025. Postmastectomy reconstruction was performed in the subpectoral plane when the defect showed greater breast height than width, whereas the prepectoral plane was used when breast width exceeded height. Complications requiring reoperation were analyzed. Patient satisfaction was evaluated based on overall satisfaction, esthetic outcome, physical symptoms, psychosocial impact, and decision satisfaction using a visual analog scale. Results: The subpectoral dual-plane approach was most commonly used between 2018 and 2019, while the prepectoral plane became predominant after 2020. Overall, 83 (14.4%) patients developed major complications. The overall satisfaction score was 4.1 ± 0.80 in the subpectoral group and 4.35 ± 0.70 in the prepectoral group, showing a statistically significant difference (p value = 0.012). Conclusions: The subpectoral and prepectoral planes have distinct advantages and limitations. Ultimately, the reconstructive surgeon should determine the most appropriate option in DTIBR. Selecting the surgical plane based on the postmastectomy defect reduces complications while improving patient satisfaction.