Hugo A. Benítez

Dr. Hugo A. Benítez

Centro de Investigación de Estudios Avanzados del Maule; Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 October 2020 in Symmetry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Hugo A. BenítezHugo A. Benítez
Hugo A. Benítez
Darija LemicDarija Lemic
Darija Lemic
AVAmado Villalobos-Leiva
Amado Villalobos-Leiva
Renata BazokRenata Bazok
Renata Bazok
RÓRodrigo Órdenes-Claveria
Rodrigo Órdenes-Claveria
Katarina MikacKatarina Mikac
Katarina Mikac
Fluctuating asymmetry (FA), in contrast with other asymmetries, is the bilateral asymmetry that represents small, random developmental differences between right and left sides. After nearly a century of using traditional morphometrics in the estimation of FA, geometric morphometrics (GM) now provides new insights into the use of FA as a tool, especially for assessing environmental and developmental stress. Thus, it will be possible to assess adaptation to various environmental stressors as particular triggers for unavoidable selection pressures. In this review, we describe measures of FA that use geometric morphometrics, and we include a flow chart of the methodology. We also describe how this combination (GM + FA) has been tested in several agroecosystems. Nutritional stress, temperature, chemical pollution, and population density are known stressors experienced by populations in agroecosystems.

12 May 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDaniela A Schmieder
Daniela A Schmieder
Hugo A. BenítezHugo A. Benítez
Hugo A. Benítez
IBIvailo M Borissov
Ivailo M Borissov
CFCarmelo Fruciano
Carmelo Fruciano
External morphology is commonly used to identify bats as well as to investigate flight and foraging behavior, typically relying on simple length and area measures or ratios. However, geometric morphometrics is increasingly used in the biological sciences to analyse variation in shape and discriminate among species and populations. Here we compare the ability of traditional versus geometric morphometric methods in discriminating between closely related bat species – in this case European horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae, Chiroptera) – based on morphology of the wing, body and tail. In addition to comparing morphometric methods, we used geometric morphometrics to detect interspecies differences as shape changes. Geometric morphometrics yielded improved species discrimination relative to traditional methods. The predicted shape for the variation along the between group principal components revealed that the largest differences between species lay in the extent to which the wing reaches in the direction of the head. This strong trend in interspecific shape variation is associated with size, which we interpret as an evolutionary allometry pattern.

13 November 2013 in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Hugo A. BenítezHugo A. Benítez
Hugo A. Benítez
DLDarija Lemic
Darija Lemic
Renata BazokRenata Bazok
Renata Bazok
CGClaudio M. Gallardo-Araya
Claudio M. Gallardo-Araya
Katarina MikacKatarina Mikac
Katarina Mikac

1 March 2015 in Zoologischer Anzeiger
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ÁZÁlvaro Zúñiga-Reinoso
Álvaro Zúñiga-Reinoso
Hugo A. BenítezHugo A. Benítez
Hugo A. Benítez


6 September 2016 in Biological Invasions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Katarina MikacKatarina Mikac
Katarina Mikac
DLDarija Lemic
Darija Lemic
Renata BazokRenata Bazok
Renata Bazok
Hugo A. BenítezHugo A. Benítez
Hugo A. Benítez