Sandra Vacas

Dr. Sandra Vacas

Instituto Agroforestal del Mediterráneo, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 July 2012 in Pest Management Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Vicente Navarro-LlopisVicente Navarro-Llopis
Vicente Navarro-Llopis
JPJaime Primo
Jaime Primo
Sandra VacasSandra Vacas
Sandra Vacas

18 May 2011 in Pest Management Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Sandra VacasSandra Vacas
Sandra Vacas
CACristina Alfaro
Cristina Alfaro
JPJaime Primo
Jaime Primo
Vicente Navarro-LlopisVicente Navarro-Llopis
Vicente Navarro-Llopis

14 June 2014 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sandra VacasSandra Vacas
Sandra Vacas
MAMaría Abad-Payá
María Abad-Payá
JPJaime Primo
Jaime Primo
Vicente Navarro-LlopisVicente Navarro-Llopis
Vicente Navarro-Llopis

1 August 2013 in Journal of Economic Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sandra VacasSandra Vacas
Sandra Vacas
JPJ. Primo
J. Primo
Vicente Navarro-LlopisVicente Navarro-Llopis
Vicente Navarro-Llopis
Given the social importance related to the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), efforts are being made to develop new

29 July 2014
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Vicente Navarro-LlopisVicente Navarro-Llopis
Vicente Navarro-Llopis
Sandra VacasSandra Vacas
Sandra Vacas

24 July 2014 in Pest Management Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vicente Navarro-LlopisVicente Navarro-Llopis
Vicente Navarro-Llopis
JPJaime Primo
Jaime Primo
Sandra VacasSandra Vacas
Sandra Vacas
BACKGROUND: The use of traps and other attract‐and‐kill devices in pest management strategies to reduce Mediterranean fruit fly populations has proved to be efficient. Nevertheless, many farmers are concerned about the effect of these devices on the trees where they are hung. Direct field observations have revealed that fruit damage is higher in trees with traps than in trees without them. This work evaluates the efficacy of different types of attract‐and‐kill device to protect fruit of the single tree on which the device is placed.RESULTS: Results suggested that trees with traps had at least the same fruit damage than trees without them. When traps were baited with protein hydrolysate, fruit damage was even higher than in trees without traps. However, fruit damage was significantly diminished when efficient bait station devices were used.CONCLUSION: Although mass trapping is able to control fruit fly populations as a control method, trees with some types of trap and bait are more susceptible to fly puncture. However, bait station devices reduce fruit damage in the single trees where they are hung. Bait stations are more efficient in fruit protection because fruit flies are affected as soon as they contact the device. Some recommendations for the use of the different attract‐and‐kill devices are discussed. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry