Faecal sludge management (FSM) in most developing countries is still insufficient. Sanitation challenges within the sub-Saharan region have led to recurring epidemics of water- and sanitation-related diseases. The use of pit latrines has been recognised as an option for on-site sanitation purposes. However, there is also concern that pit latrine leachates may cause harm to human and ecological health. Integrated approaches for improved access to water and sanitation through proper faecal sludge management are needed to address these issues. Biochar a carbon-rich adsorbent produced from any organic biomass when integrated with soil can potentially reduce contamination. The incorporation of biochar in FSM studies has numerous benefits in the control of prospective contaminants (i.e., heavy metals and inorganic and organic pollutants). This review paper evaluated the potential use of biochar in FSM. It was shown from the reviewed articles that biochar is a viable option for faecal sludge management because of its ability to bind contaminants. Challenges and possible sustainable ways to incorporate biochar in pit latrine sludge management were also illustrated. Biochar use as a low-cost adsorbent in wastewater contaminant mitigation can improve the quality of water resources. Biochar-amended sludge can also be repurposed as a useful economical by-product.

A common strategy for ameliorating soil acidity is the application of agricultural lime. However, this measure is hampered by the lack of high resolution soil maps that can enable lime application according to the spatial variability of soil pH in an area. Therefore, this study was carried out to map soil acidity in South Eastern Zambia. The objective of the study was to apply geostatistical procedures to mapping soil acidity in the country. Ordinary kriging was performed on a set of 119 soil samples collected from the 0–20 cm soil layer whose pH was determined by the electrometric method. The kriging model that was developed was found to be satisfactory with low prediction errors (root mean square error 0.36). Thus, the map produced could be used to draw up strategies for management of soil acidity in the area.

Soils on many smallholder farms in Southern Africa are severely depleted in plant nutrients, in particular phosphorus (P), following years of maize monocropping with little or no fertilizer input. Past studies suggest that pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) may increase plant-available P. Pigeon pea is not a common crop in much of Southern Africa, and the effect of locally grown pigeon pea varieties on plant-available P is unknown. We assessed the changes in plant-available P after growing pigeon pea varieties MPPV-2, MPPV-3, and Babati White in Zambia, viz. Lixisols of Choma and Mkushi, Acrisols of Chipata and Kasama, and Arenosols of Kaoma. The selected soils were not fertilized. Baseline soils (0–20 cm), sampled after long-term maize monocropping and soils from the same fields after growing pigeon pea were collected from field trials in Kaoma, Chipata, Choma, and Mkushi and analyzed for plant-available P. Further, a greenhouse study was conducted with soils from Kasama, Choma, Kaoma, and Chipata, under which soil P was determined before and after growing pigeon pea, soybean (Dina), and maize (SC 419) without fertilizer addition. Pigeon pea under field studies had no significant (p > 0.05) effect on plant-available P in Choma, Kaoma, and Chipata. In Mkushi, pigeon pea cropping resulted in a 47.5% significant decline (p ≤ 0.05) in plant-available P, amounting to a loss of 11.2 kg ha⁻¹. The greenhouse study showed a significant decline (p ≤ 0.001) in plant-available P after seven weeks of maize growth, while there was no significant (p > 0.05) effect on plant-available P after soybean and pigeon pea cropping. The latter was primarily due to the significantly higher P uptake associated with larger biomass production of maize after seven weeks in the greenhouse. During the initial seven weeks, pigeon pea biomass had significantly higher P concentrations than maize. Thus, P deficiency symptoms were exhibited in maize, while pigeon pea appeared healthy. However, mobilized P, calculated as the sum of plant P and soil P after cropping minus soil P before planting, was significantly lower (p ≤ 0.01) in pigeon pea compared to soybean and maize. Synthesizing field and greenhouse experiments suggests that there is a low net decline of plant-available P from soils after pigeon pea cropping. Therefore, rotation with these pigeon pea varieties could be beneficial to resource-poor farmers due to low P removal and its ability to grow in P-deficient soil.