Smart implants are implantable devices that provide not only therapeutic benefits but also have diagnostic capabilities. The integration of smart implants into daily clinical practice has the potential for massive cost savings to the health care system. Applications for smart orthopedic implants have been identified for knee arthroplasty, hip arthroplasty, spine fusion, fracture fixation and others. To date, smart orthopedic implants have been used to measure physical parameters from inside the body, including pressure, force, strain, displacement, proximity and temperature. The measurement of physical stimuli is achieved through integration of application-specific technology with the implant. Data from smart implants have led to refinements in implant design, surgical technique and strategies for postoperative care and rehabilitation. In spite of decades of research, with very few exceptions, smart implants have not yet become a part of daily clinical practice. This is largely because integration of current sensor technology necessitates significant modification to the implants. While the technology underlying smart implants has matured significantly over the last several decades, there are still significant technical challenges that need to be overcome before smart implants become part of mainstream health care. Sensors for next-generation smart implants will be small, simple, robust and inexpensive and will necessitate little to no modification to existing implant designs. With rapidly advancing technology, the widespread implementation of smart implants is near. New sensor technology that minimizes modifications to existing implants is the key to enabling smart implants into daily clinical practice.

Biomechanical testing methodologies for the spine have developed over the past 50 years. During that time, there have been several paradigm shifts with respect to techniques. These techniques evolved by incorporating state‐of‐the‐art engineering principles, in vivo measurements, anatomical structure‐function relationships, and the scientific method. Multiple parametric studies have focused on the effects that the experimental technique has on outcomes. As a result, testing methodologies have evolved, but there are no standard testing protocols, which makes the comparison of findings between experiments difficult and conclusions about in vivo performance challenging. In 2019, the international spine research community was surveyed to determine the consensus on spine biomechanical testing and if the consensus opinion was consistent with the scientific evidence. More than 80 responses to the survey were received. The findings of this survey confirmed that while some methods have been commonly adopted, not all are consistent with the scientific evidence. This review summarizes the scientific literature, the current consensus, and the authors' recommendations on best practices based on the compendium of available evidence.

After undergoing anulotomy, lumbar intervertebral discs from sheep were treated with small intestinal submucosa (SIS) and assessed functionally at 24 weeks after surgery. To determine the efficacy of an SIS-based patch and plug scaffold to facilitate anular defect closure and anular functional recovery after anulotomy and partial discectomy. The incidence of reherniation following discectomy remains high and mechanical means of anular closure have met with limited success. SIS is a naturally occurring collagen-based material, which acts as a resorbable scaffold in vivo that promotes soft tissue regeneration. Twelve sheep underwent retroperitoneal exposure of the lumbar spine. Three levels were assigned to either: no additional procedure, box anulotomy alone, or box anulotomy followed by placement of an SIS "patch and plug" anchored by titanium bone screws. At 26 weeks after surgery, 18 motion segments underwent pressure-volume testing to assess the competency of the anulus. High resolution MRI images were taken of the remaining 18 segments. Undecalcified histology was conducted on all specimens. Radiographs, MRI images, and histology indicate that there was an exuberant tissue response at SIS-treated levels. New tissue formation in SIS-treated specimens was integrated well with the native anulus, but did not resemble the organization of native anulus. The extent of anular closure was substantial enough to allow the disc a functional recovery to a mean 66% of its capacity to develop internal pressure. MRI images indicate that SIS-treated levels did not maintain signal intensity comparable to exposure-only (intact) levels, but SIS-treated discs were statistically significantly higher than anulotomy-only levels. SIS-treated discs were better able to maintain hydration and resulted in a functional recovery relative to anulotomy alone levels. The SIS patch and plug reduced the cascade of functional degeneration that an intervertebral disc undergoes following anulotomy.

Study Design.: Real time in vivo measurement of forces in the cervical spine of goats following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Objective.: To measure interbody forces in the cervical spine during the time course of fusion following ACDF with plates of different stiffnesses. Summary of Background Data.: Following ACDF, the biomechanics of the arthrodesis is largely dictated by the plate. The properties of the plate prescribe the extent of load-sharing through the disc space versus the extent of stress-shielding. Load-sharing promotes interbody bone formation and stress-shielding can inhibit maturation of bone. However, these principles have never been validated in vivo. Measuring in vivo biomechanics of the cervical spine is critical to understanding the complex relationships between implant design, interbody loading, load-sharing, and the progression of fusion. Methods.: Anterior cervical plates of distinct bending stiffnesses were placed surgically following ACDF in goats. A validated custom force-sensing interbody implant was placed in the disc space to measure load-sharing in the spine. Interbody loads were measured in vivo in real time during the course of fusion for each plate. Results.: Interbody forces during flexion/extension were highly dynamic. In animals that received high stiffness plates, maximum forces were in extension whereas in animals that received lower stiffness plates, maximum forces were in flexion. As fusion progressed, interbody load magnitude decreased. Conclusion.: The magnitude of interbody forces in the cervical spine is dynamic and correlates to activity and posture of the head and neck. The magnitude and consistency of forces in the interbody space correlates to plate stiffness with more compliant plates resulting in more consistent load-sharing. The magnitude of interbody forces decreases as fusion matures suggesting that smart interbody implants may be used as a diagnostic tool to indicate the progression of interbody fusion. Level of Evidence: N/A