The use of polymer-modified binders in asphalt mixtures has become more widespread due to their reduced thermal susceptibility and improved rutting and fatigue resistance. Nevertheless, their high cost limits their application, thus making the use of reclaimed polymers (RP) an interesting alternative for both reducing price and extending the service life of pavements. This paper; therefore, presents a comparative review of the recycled polymers most commonly studied as bitumen modifiers: polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA), and ground tire rubber (GTR), in order to facilitate their selection and extend the use of the bitumen. The differences in terms of melting point, mixing conditions, and maximum quantity of added polymer are analyzed. Moreover, their effect on the mechanical behavior of the asphalt binders and their stability with and without the use of additives is presented. According to the literature revision, the performance of the new binder is more influenced by the kind of polymer that was incorporated and the mixing conditions than by the base bitumen that was chosen, although rheological evaluation is needed to fully understand the modification mechanisms of the modified binder. In general terms, plastomers have a stronger effect in terms of increasing the stiffness of the bitumen in comparison with crumb rubber (elastomers), thus providing an improved rutting resistance. The joint use of polyethylene (plastomer) and crumb rubber (elastomer) can be an interesting option for its recycling potential and mechanical performance, although further study is needed to achieve stable bitumen across the entire range of temperatures; additives, such as maleic anhydride (MA), are commonly employed to improve the stability of the binder and enhance its characteristics, but their use could limit the economic benefits of using recycled materials.

This is a journal article. It was published in the journal, Safety Science [© Elsevier] and the definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.09.004Workplace accidents still occur with distressing frequency, particularly in construction. Industrialized\ud countries have become increasingly aware of this situation and have adopted policies to attempt to deal with\ud this issue. Such policies have led to the development of new laws and regulations with a view to improving\ud workplace conditions.\ud This paper first analyzes policies regarding accident prevention in the European Union, as initially stipulated\ud in the European Framework Directive 89/391/EEC, and more specifically in Directive 92/57/EEC, on the\ud implementation of minimum safety and health requirements at temporary or mobile construction sites,\ud concentrating on prevention through design. Whilst designers previously had some responsibilities for\ud reducing risk under common law provisions in many countries, this directive was the first explicit legislation to\ud enforce particular duties upon them. The adaptation of the provisions in this directive to the national\ud legislation of EU member countries is also studied.\ud The second section of the paper analyzes the incidence rate of workplace accidents in the construction\ud sector in each country from the year when these regulations came into force until the present time. Based on\ud the evolution of these accident rates, the paper postulates the extent to which European policies have\ud contributed to accident prevention in construction. It is now more than a decade since this legislation has\ud been in force which provides a suitable period for a reflective analysis on it is impact