The Per Geijer iron oxide apatite deposits are important potential future resources for Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara Aktiebolag (LKAB) which has been continuously mining magnetite/hematite ores in northern Sweden for over 125 years. Reliable and quantitative characterization of the mineralization is required as these ores inherit complex mineralogical and textural features. Scanning electron microscopy-based analyses software, such as mineral liberation analyzer (MLA) provide significant, time-efficient analyses. Similar elemental compositions of Fe-oxides and, therefore, almost identical backscattered electron (BSE) intensities complicate their discrimination. In this study, MLA and Raman imaging are compared to acquire mineralogical data for better characterization of magnetite and hematite-bearing ores. The different approaches demonstrate advantages and disadvantages in classification, imaging, discrimination of iron oxides, and time consumption of measurement and processing. The obtained precise mineralogical information improves the characterization of ore types and will benefit future processing strategies for this complex mineralization.

Iron oxide-apatite (IOA) deposits are an important source of iron ore based on the modal abundance of magnetite > 90 vol.%. Further interest is generated due to the high variability of apatite and hematite in some of these ores. The origin of the so-called Kiruna-type deposits has been subject to controversy for more than a century. Models range from a purely magmatic origin to ore-forming processes that involve variable stages of hydrothermal fluid involvement to a not widely accepted sedimentary-exhalative origin. In contribution of understanding ore-forming processes of this deposit type, we performed mineral chemistry and trace element analyses on samples from the Per Geijer deposits. They account for the lesser studied deposits in the Kiruna district of northern Sweden. A comprehensive mineral-chemical dataset of magnetite and hematite obtained by electron microprobe analysis (EPMA) and LA-ICP-MS from representative drill core samples is presented. Magnetite and four different types of hematite constitute the massive orebodies: Primary and pristine magnetite with moderate to high concentrations of Ti (∼61–2180 ppm), Ni (∼11–480 ppm), Co (∼5–300 ppm) and V (∼553–1831 ppm) indicate a magmatic origin for magnetite. Hematite type I appears as a replacement of magnetite with high Ti (∼15,700–42,300 ppm), relatively constant V (∼1460–2160 ppm) and moderate Sn (∼29–105 ppm) concentrations. Moderate and variable Ti (∼369–12,490 ppm) and low Sn (∼1.4–19 ppm) concentrations are representative for hematite type II. Hematite type III has lowest Ti (∼99–1250 ppm) concentrations. Significantly high Ti concentrations (∼12,100–78,700 ppm), low V (∼132–381 ppm) and high Sn (∼129–456 ppm) concentrations account for type IV. The presence of fluorapatite and disseminated pyrite with high Co:Ni ratios (> 1–10) in massive magnetite ores are consistent with a high temperature (∼ 800°C) genesis for the deposit. The different and abundant types of hematite state subsequent hydrothermal events.