Dyfrig Hughes

Dr. Dyfrig Hughes

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2015 in Value in Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TRTrevor Richter
Trevor Richter
SNSandra Nestler-Parr
Sandra Nestler-Parr
RBRobert Babela
Robert Babela
ZKZeba M. Khan
Zeba M. Khan
TTTheresa Tesoro
Theresa Tesoro
DHDyfrig Hughes
Dyfrig Hughes

27 April 2017 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAthimalaipet V. Ramanan
Athimalaipet V. Ramanan
ADAndrew D. Dick
Andrew D. Dick
AJAshley P. Jones
Ashley P. Jones
AMAndrew McKay
Andrew McKay
PWPaula R. Williamson
Paula R. Williamson
MBMichael W. Beresford
Michael W. Beresford
Adalimumab, a fully human anti–tumor necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody, is effective in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We tested the efficacy of adalimumab in the treatment of JIA-associated uveitis.

3 July 2018 in Annals of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSabina M De Geest
Sabina M De Geest
LZLeah L. Zullig
Leah L. Zullig
JDJacqueline Dunbar-Jacob
Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob
RHRemon Helmy
Remon Helmy
DHDyfrig Hughes
Dyfrig Hughes
Bernard VrijensBernard Vrijens
Bernard Vrijens
This guideline, structured around 4 minimum criteria and 17 items reflecting best practice, aims to help researchers improve the quality of reporting medication adherence research. Research on assessing or managing medication adherence applies approaches from observational, interventional, and implementation science that spans many disciplines and demands coherent conceptuali...

3 August 2010 in Aging & Mental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GWGill Windle
Gill Windle
DHDyfrig Hughes
Dyfrig Hughes
PLPat Linck
Pat Linck
IRIan Russell
Ian Russell
BWBob Woods
Bob Woods
Background: Promoting the mental well-being of older people has been neglected. Aim: To examine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of exercise and physical activity interventions on mental well-being in people aged 65+. Design: Systematic review, meta-analysis, economic model. Methods: Reports published in English, identified by searching 25 databases, 11 websites and references lists of systematic reviews. Eligible studies were those with a comparison or control group or offering qualitative evidence; exercise and physical activity interventions for people aged 65 and above living at home, in the community, in supported housing or in residential care homes; including outcome measures of mental well-being, not simply measures of depression or anxiety. Low-quality studies were excluded from the data synthesis. Results: An overall effect of exercise on mental well-being was found (standardised effect size = 0.27; CI = 0.14–0.40). The included interventions were designed for older people, targeted those who are sedentary and delivered in a community setting, primarily through a group-based approach led by trained leaders. As a minimum, the evidence would suggest two exercise sessions per week, each of 45 min duration. There is some indication that exercise can also improve the mental well-being of frail elders. Economic evidence indicated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (compared with minimal intervention) of £7300 and £12,100 per quality adjusted life year gained for community-based walking and exercise programmes, respectively. Conclusions: Mental well-being in later life is modifiable through exercise and physical activity. To generalise the findings, there is a need for more evidence of effectiveness from older people in the UK.

16 April 2013 in Drugs
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FTfor the ABC project team
for the ABC project team
JDJenny Demonceau
Jenny Demonceau
TRTodd Ruppar
Todd Ruppar
PKPaulus Kristanto
Paulus Kristanto
DHDyfrig Hughes
Dyfrig Hughes
Bernard VrijensBernard Vrijens
Bernard Vrijens
Background Non-adherence to medications is prevalent across all medical conditions that include ambulatory pharmacotherapy and is thus a major barrier to achieving the benefits of otherwise effective medicines. Objective The objective of this systematic review was to identify and to compare the efficacy of strategies and components thereof that improve implementation of the prescribed drug dosing regimen and maintain long-term persistence, based on quantitative evaluation of effect sizes across the aggregated trials. Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials that tested the efficacy of adherence-enhancing strategies with self-administered medications. The searches were limited to papers in the English language and were included from database inception to 31 December 2011. Study selection Our review included randomized controlled trials in which adherence was assessed by electronically compiled drug dosing histories. Five thousand four hundred studies were screened. Eligibility assessment was performed independently by two reviewers. A structured data collection sheet was developed to extract data from each study. Study appraisal and synthesis methods The adherence-enhancing components were classified in eight categories. Quality of the papers was assessed using the criteria of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions guidelines to assess potential bias. A combined adherence outcome was derived from the different adherence variables available in the studies by extracting from each paper the available adherence summary variables in a pre-defined order (correct dosing, taking adherence, timing adherence, percentage of adherent patients). To study the association between the adherence-enhancing components and their effect on adherence, a linear meta-regression model, based on mean adherence point estimates, and a meta-analysis were conducted. Results Seventy-nine clinical trials published between 1995 and December 2011 were included in the review. Patients randomized to an intervention group had an average combined adherence outcome of 74.3 %, which was 14.1 % higher than in patients randomized to the control group (60.2 %). The linear meta-regression analysis with stepwise variable selection estimated an 8.8 % increase in adherence when the intervention included feedback to the patients of their recent dosing history (EM-feedback) (p < 0.01) and a 5.0 % increase in adherence when the intervention included a cognitive-educational component (p = 0.02). In addition, the effect of interventions on adherence decreased by 1.1 % each month. Sensitivity analysis by selecting only high-quality papers confirmed the robustness of the model. The random effects model in the meta-analysis, conducted on 48 studies, confirmed the above findings and showed that the improvement in adherence was 19.8 % (95 % CI 10.7–28.9 %) among patients receiving EM-feedback, almost double the improvement in adherence for studies that did not include this type of feedback [10.3 % (95 % CI 7.5–13.1 %)] (p < 0.01). The improvement in adherence was 16.1 % (95 % CI 10.7–21.6 %) in studies that tested cognitive-educational components versus 10.1 % (95 % CI 6.6–13.6 %) in studies that did not include this type of intervention (p = 0.04). Among 57 studies measuring clinical outcomes, only 8 reported a significant improvement in clinical outcome. Limitations Despite a common measurement, the meta-analysis was limited by the heterogeneity of the pooled data and the different measures of medication adherence. The funnel plot showed a possible publication bias in studies with high variability of the intervention effect. Conclusions Notwithstanding the statistical heterogeneity among the studies identified, and potential publication bias, the evidence from our meta-analysis suggests that EM-feedback and cognitive-educational interventions are potentially effective approaches to enhance patient adherence to medications. The limitations of this research highlight the urgent need to define guidelines and study characteristics for research protocols that can guide researchers in designing studies to assess the effects of adherence-enhancing interventions.

1 June 2004 in Pharmacogenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHDyfrig Hughes
Dyfrig Hughes
FVF Javier Vilar
F Javier Vilar
CWCharlotte C Ward
Charlotte C Ward
AAAna Alfirevic
Ana Alfirevic
BPB Kevin Park
B Kevin Park
MPMunir Pirmohamed
Munir Pirmohamed
Abacavir, a human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) nucleoside-analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, causes severe hypersensitivity in 4–8% of patients. HLA B*5701 is a known genetic risk factor for abacavir hypersensitivity in Caucasians. Our aim was to confirm the presence of this genetic factor in our patients, and to determine whether genotyping for HLA B*5701 would be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources. Patients with and without abacavir hypersensitivity were identified from a UK HIV clinic. Patients were genotyped for HLA B*5701, and pooled data used for calculation of test characteristics. The cost-effectiveness analysis incorporated the cost of testing, cost of treating abacavir hypersensitivity, and the cost and selection of alternative antiretroviral regimens. A probabilistic decision analytic model (comparing testing versus no testing) was formulated and Monte Carlo simulations performed. Of the abacavir hypersensitive patients, six (46%) were HLA B*5701 positive, compared to five (10%) of the non-hypersensitive patients (odds ratio 7.9 [95% confidence intervals 1.5–41.4], P = 0.006). Pooling of our data on HLA B*5701 with published data resulted in a pooled odds ratio of 29 (95% CI 6.4–132.3; P < 0.0001). The cost-effectiveness model demonstrated that depending on the choice of comparator, routine testing for HLA B*5701 ranged from being a dominant strategy (less expensive and more beneficial than not testing) to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (versus no testing) of €22 811 per hypersensitivity reaction avoided. Abacavir hypersensitivity is associated with HLA B*5701, and pre-prescription pharmacogenetic testing for this appears to be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources.