Within the context of larger studies examining how dynamic membrane behaviour can directly influence cell fate, immunity and cellular identity.Trogocytosis at the cancer-immune interface: Guha and Banerjee (2025) provide the conceptual framework for the collection by reviewing the mechanisms, biological consequences, and therapeutic implications of trogocytosis in cancer. They emphasise that the principle of trogocytosis is context-dependent. How the cellular transfer contributes to tumour development depends on the donor and recipient cell type, the mode of transfer, the identity of the transferred cargo, and the biological consequence (phenotype) established by trogocytosis. As a result, trogocytosis cannot be categorised as either tumor enhancing nor tumour-suppressing.Membrane exchange as such can impact antigen expression level, surface availability of receptors, checkpoint status, and immune cell function inside the TME. Tumour cells can gain anti-immune molecules, whereas immune cells may acquire tumour-associated moieties or modify the targets via receptor ripping and other contact-mediated mechanisms. The bidirectional nature of this crosstalk can be especially important in cellular immunotherapy. In a CAR-T or CAR-NK cell, antigen transfer from tumour cells may serve to reduce target antigen levels on tumour cells while presenting these targets on immune cells, settings which can potentially enhance tumour antigen escape, inducing changes in effector cell phenotype, stimulating exhaustion and/or fratricide. However, immune cell trogocytosis may also serve to suppress tumour activity, and hence the real interest here lies in determining who is doing the transferring of what to whom, under which circumstances, and at what functional impact. As such, the resulting model-attenuated STAT1-CH25H signaling, altered cholesterolassociated membrane regulation, increased membrane fluidity, and enhanced trogocytosisproviding a mechanistic bridge between cell state, lipid biology, membrane biophysics, and intercellular exchange. This observation matters because CSCs are well known for their tendency towards persistence, plasticity, resistance to therapies, and reemergence. A heightened trogocytic ability would then give these kinds of cells another, genetic-free avenue for promptly changing their surface identity in response to being attacked. As the result does, it moved the field's efforts beyond the basic question: Do tumor cells indeed pursue trogocytosis, toward that of: Which tumor-cell states specifically afford that capability, and what programs at the biophysical and molecular level permit it?From membrane exchange to acquired cellular identity: Together, the cancer-focused contributions suggest a useful conceptual distinction between intrinsic cellular identity and acquired membrane identity. Intrinsic identity reflects molecules produced through a cell's own transcriptional, translational, and metabolic programs. Acquired membrane identity reflects proteins, receptors, lipids, or other membrane components obtained through physical interaction with neighboring cells. In a trogocytosis-active environment, the functional cellular state may therefore emerge from both. This distinction has experimental implications. Detection of a surface molecule does not necessarily establish that the cell displaying it synthesized it. In tumors, inflammatory tissues, and engineered cellular therapies, investigators may increasingly need to distinguish endogenous expression from trogocytic acquisition. The CSC study adds a further dimension by suggesting that the ability to acquire such an identity is itself regulated by membrane state. Collectively, these contributions encourage a view of the plasma membrane not simply as a boundary, but as an adaptive interface through which cellular phenotype can be modified (Miyake & Karasuyama.,2021). In cancer, tumor and immune cells should therefore not always be regarded as fixed participants entering an interaction with immutable identities. Through trogocytosis, the interaction itself can alter the molecular phenotype and subsequent behavior of the participants (Li et al.,2021). The next phase of the field may be defined by four deceptively simple questions: Who gives? Who receives? What is transferred? And what does the recipient become? Answering them may transform trogocytosis from an intriguing cellular phenomenon into a mechanistically defined and therapeutically actionable dimension of cancer immunity.