Happiness, generativity and social preferences are pivotal factors for the betterment and sustainability of societies. However, little is known about the relationships among happiness, generativity and social preferences, along with sociodemographic factors, within a single analytical framework. We hypothesize that generativity and social preferences are the determinants of happiness, posing a research question “Are people happier by being prosocial and/or generative for sustainability?” We conduct a survey experiment, collecting data from five subjective happiness scales, generativity, social value orientation and sociodemographic variables in one urban area (Dhaka) and two rural areas (Bogra and Gaibandha) in Bangladesh. With the data, we empirically characterize determinants of subjective happiness with a focus on generativity and social value orientation, controlling for sociodemographic factors. The statistical analysis consistently shows a positive association between subjective happiness and generativity, irrespective of the type of happiness scale, while social value orientation does not exhibit any significance. Rural residents have lower peer relative happiness than urban residents, and household income has a positive relationship with general subjective happiness, leading each of these factors to be significant in overall subjective happiness. In summary, generativity, income and residence area are main determinants of happiness, implying that further urbanization, which is expected to occur in the future, will positively affect people’s happiness if it can bring about an increase in generativity. These results also suggest a possibility that people are happier by being more generative for sustainability, and some new institutional framework such as future design shall be recommended to enhance generativity.

An intergenerational sustainability dilemma (ISD) is a situation of whether or not a person sacrifices herself for future sustainability. However, little is known about what people consider while making a decision under ISD. This paper analyzes motivational factors for people to decide under ISD, hypothesizing that the factors can be different with or without perspective-taking of future generations. One-person basic ISD game (ISDG) along with post-interviews are instituted where a lineup of individuals is organized as a generational sequence. Each individual chooses an unsustainable (or sustainable) option with (without) irreversibly costing future generations in 36 situations. A future ahead and back (FAB) mechanism is applied as a treatment for perspective-taking of future generations where each individual is asked to take the next generation’s position and to make a request about the choice that he/she wants the current generation to choose, and next, he/she makes the actual decision from the original position. By analyzing the post-interview contents with text-mining techniques, the paper finds that individuals mostly consider how previous generations had behaved in basic ISDG as the main motivational factor. However, individuals in FAB treatment are induced to put more weight on the possible consequences of their decisions for future generations as motivational factors. The findings suggest that perspective-taking of future generations through FAB mechanism enables people to change not only their behaviors but also motivational factors, enhancing ISD.

Work-related stress and workplace deviant behavior are major concerns in modern organizations, particularly in academic and administrative settings. This study investigates the mediating roles of work-family conflict (WFC) and family-work conflict (FWC) in the relationship between job stress and workplace deviance. While prior research has established a link between stress and deviant behavior, few studies have explored how conflicts between professional and personal responsibilities influence this connection. To bridge this gap, an online survey was conducted with a randomly selected sample of 193 academic and administrative employees from an Egyptian university. A quantitative research approach was adopted, incorporating exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate measurement models. Regression analysis was employed to examine direct relationships, while mediation analysis assessed the indirect effects of WFC and FWC on the stress-deviance relationship. The results indicate that work-related stress significantly predicts both WFC and FWC. However, only FWC mediates the link between stress and workplace deviance, whereas WFC does not play a mediating role. These findings highlight the need to address family-related conflicts to mitigate workplace deviance. Organizations can reduce such behaviors by implementing policies that promote work-life balance and provide greater support for employees.

The future of Earth depends on the investment choices of companies and individuals. Over the past decade, investment decisions of individuals have been intensely studied by researchers in developed countries. Yet, very few studies focused on these investment decisions in developing countries using an experimental approach. This study adopts an experimental approach to examine the impact of ESG awareness on the sustainable investment decisions of undergraduate students in Egypt. In the experiment, subjects were asked to watch a video on investment basics (control) and investment and ESG basics (treatment). After that, the subjects were asked to choose between two choices, one sustainable (ESG choice) and one unsustainable with and without a return difference. After controlling for demographic characteristics, personal traits, financial knowledge, and risk tolerance, the results indicate that ESG awareness increases the probability of making sustainable investment decisions. Moreover, the findings indicate that sustainable investing among individuals is conditional on higher or equal returns than conventional investing. The study provides practical insights for professionals and policy recommendations.