Intravesicular pH plays a crucial role in melanosome maturation and function. Melanosomal pH changes during maturation from very acidic in the early stages to neutral in late stages. Neutral pH is critical for providing optimal conditions for the rate-limiting, pH-sensitive melanin-synthesizing enzyme tyrosinase (TYR). This dramatic change in pH is thought to result from the activity of several proteins that control melanosomal pH. Here, we computationally investigated the pH-dependent stability of several melanosomal membrane proteins and compared them to the pH dependence of the stability of TYR. We confirmed that the pH optimum of TYR is neutral, and we also found that proteins that are negative regulators of melanosomal pH are predicted to function optimally at neutral pH. In contrast, positive pH regulators were predicted to have an acidic pH optimum. We propose a competitive mechanism among positive and negative regulators that results in pH equilibrium. Our findings are consistent with previous work that demonstrated a correlation between the pH optima of stability and activity, and they are consistent with the expected activity of positive and negative regulators of melanosomal pH. Furthermore, our data suggest that disease-causing variants impact the pH dependence of melanosomal proteins; this is particularly prominent for the OCA2 protein. In conclusion, melanosomal pH appears to affect the activity of multiple melanosomal proteins.

Opioid addiction is a complex phenomenon with genetic, social, and other components. Due to such complexity, it is difficult to interpret the outcome of clinical studies, and thus, mutations found in individuals with these addictions are still not indisputably classified as opioid addiction-causing variants. Here, we computationally investigated two such mutations, A6V and N40D, found in the mu opioid receptor gene OPRM1. The mutations are located in the extracellular domain of the corresponding protein, which is important to the hetero-dimerization of OPRM1 with the delta opioid receptor protein (OPRD1). The hetero-dimerization of OPRD1–OPRM1 affects the signaling pathways activated by opioids and natural peptides and, thus, could be considered a factor contributing to addiction. In this study, we built four 3D structures of molecular pathways, including the G-protein signaling pathway and the β-arrestin signaling pathway of the heterodimer of OPRD1–OPRM1. We also analyzed the effect of mutations of A6V and N40D on the stability of individual OPRM1/OPRD1 molecules and the OPRD1–OPRM1 heterodimer with the goal of inferring their plausible linkage with opioid addiction. It was found that both mutations slightly destabilize OPRM1/OPRD1 monomers and weaken their association. Since hetero-dimerization is a key step for signaling processes, it is anticipated that both mutations may be causing increased addiction risk.

This study suggests that two newly discovered variants in the MSH2 gene, which codes for a DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein, can be associated with a high risk of breast cancer. While variants in the MSH2 gene are known to be linked with an elevated cancer risk, the MSH2 gene is not a part of the standard kit for testing patients for elevated breast cancer risk. Here we used the results of genetic testing of women diagnosed with breast cancer, but who did not have variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Instead, the test identified four variants with unknown significance (VUS) in the MSH2 gene. Here, we carried in silico analysis to develop a classifier that can distinguish pathogenic from benign mutations in MSH2 genes taken from ClinVar. The classifier was then used to classify VUS in MSH2 genes, and two of them, p.Ala272Val and p.Met592Val, were predicted to be pathogenic mutations. These two mutations were found in women with breast cancer who did not have mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, and thus they are suggested to be considered as new bio-markers for the early detection of elevated breast cancer risk. However, before this is done, an in vitro validation of mutation pathogenicity is needed and, moreover, the presence of these mutations should be demonstrated in a higher number of patients or in families with breast cancer history.