Iain Soutar

Iain Soutar

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 September 2006 in Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JRJohn Rowan
John Rowan
JCJ. Carwardine
J. Carwardine
RDR.W. Duck
R.W. Duck
OBO.M. Bragg
O.M. Bragg
ABAndrew Black
Andrew Black
PBP.J. Boon
P.J. Boon

17 October 2022 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ISIain Soutar
Iain Soutar
PDPatrick Devine-Wright
Patrick Devine-Wright
MRMelanie Rohse
Melanie Rohse
CWChad Walker
Chad Walker
LGLuke Gooding
Luke Gooding
IKImogen Kay
Imogen Kay

11 July 2022 in Energy Research & Social Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EJEmily Judson
Emily Judson
OFOscar Fitch-Roy
Oscar Fitch-Roy
ISIain Soutar
Iain Soutar

1 January 2018 in Energy Research & Social Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ISIain Soutar
Iain Soutar
CMCatherine Mitchell
Catherine Mitchell

4 October 2021 in Frontiers in Climate
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JSJames Suckling
James Suckling
CHClaire Hoolohan
Claire Hoolohan
ISIain Soutar
Iain Soutar
Angela DruckmanAngela Druckman
Angela Druckman
Recognizing that there are multiple environmental limits within which humanity can safely operate, it is essential that potential negative outcomes of seemingly positive actions are accounted for. This alertness to unintended consequences underscores the importance of so called “nexus” research, which recognizes the integrated and interactive nature of water, energy and food systems, and aims to understand the broader implications of developments in any one of these systems. This article presents a novel framework for categorizing such detrimental unintended consequences, based upon how much is known about the system in question and the scope for avoiding any such unintended consequences. The framework comprises four categories (Knowable and Avoidable; Knowable and Unavoidable; Unknowable and Avoidable, and Unknowable and Unavoidable). The categories are explored with reference to examples in both the water-energy-food nexus and planetary boundary frameworks. The examples highlight the potential for the unexpected to happen and explore dynamic nature of the situations that give rise to the unexpected. The article concludes with guidance on how the framework can be used to increase confidence that best efforts have been made to navigate our way toward secure and sustainable water, energy and food systems, avoiding and/or managing unintended consequences along the way.

1 September 2017 in Energy Procedia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IHIsmail Haltas
Ismail Haltas
JSJames Suckling
James Suckling
ISIain Soutar
Iain Soutar
Angela DruckmanAngela Druckman
Angela Druckman
Liz VargaLiz Varga
Liz Varga
We solve the problem of identifying one or more optimal patterns of anaerobic digestion (AD) installation across the UK, by considering existing installations, the current feedstock potential and the project growth of the potential via population, demography and urbanization. We test several scenarios for the level of adoption of the AD operations in the community under varying amounts of feedstock supply, which may arise from change in food waste or energy crops generation via other policies and incentives. For the most resilient scales of solutions, we demonstrate for the UK the net energy production (bio-gas and electricity) from AD (and so the avoided emissions from grid energy), the mass of bio-waste processed (and avoided land-fill), and the quantum of digestate produced (as a proxy for avoided irrigation and fertilizer production). In order to simulate the AD innovation within WEF nexus we use agent based modelling (ABM) owing to its bottom-up approach and capability of modelling complex systems with relatively low level data and information