Wenjie Dong

Prof. Wenjie Dong


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 July 2012 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TWTing Wei
Ting Wei
SYShili Yang
Shili Yang
JMJohn C. Moore
John C. Moore
PSPeijun Shi
Peijun Shi
XCXuefeng Cui
Xuefeng Cui
WDWenjie Dong
Wenjie Dong
At the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference in Cancun, in November 2010, the Heads of State reached an agreement on the aim of limiting the global temperature rise to 2 °C relative to preindustrial levels. They recognized that long-term future warming is primarily constrained by cumulative anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, that deep cuts in global emissions are required, and that action based on equity must be taken to meet this objective. However, negotiations on emission reduction among countries are increasingly fraught with difficulty, partly because of arguments about the responsibility for the ongoing temperature rise. Simulations with two earth-system models (NCAR/CESM and BNU-ESM) demonstrate that developed countries had contributed about 60–80%, developing countries about 20–40%, to the global temperature rise, upper ocean warming, and sea-ice reduction by 2005. Enacting pledges made at Cancun with continuation to 2100 leads to a reduction in global temperature rise relative to business as usual with a 1/3–2/3 (CESM 33–67%, BNU-ESM 35–65%) contribution from developed and developing countries, respectively. To prevent a temperature rise by 2 °C or more in 2100, it is necessary to fill the gap with more ambitious mitigation efforts.

29 April 2014 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WYWenping Yuan
Wenping Yuan
DLDan Liu
Dan Liu
WDWenjie Dong
Wenjie Dong
SLShuguang Liu
Shuguang Liu
GZGuangsheng Zhou
Guangsheng Zhou
LZLiang Zhao
Liang Zhao
Drought has been a concern in global and regional water, carbon, and energy cycles. From 1999 to 2011, northern China experienced a multiyear precipitation reduction that significantly decreased water availability as indicated by the Palmer Drought Severity Index and soil moisture measurements. In this study, a light use efficiency model (EC‐LUE) and an ecosystem physiological model (IBIS) were used to characterize the impacts of long‐term drought on terrestrial carbon fluxes in northern China. EC‐LUE and IBIS models showed the reduction of averaged GPP of 0.09 and 0.05 Pg C yr−1 during 1999–2011 compared with 1982–1998. Based on the IBIS model, simulated ecosystem respiration experienced an insignificant decrease from 1999 to 2011. The multiyear precipitation reduction changed the regional carbon uptake of 0.011 Pg C yr−1 from 1982 to 1998 to a net source of 0.018 Pg C yr−1 from 1999 to 2011. Moreover, a pronounced decrease in maize yield in almost all provinces in the study region was found from 1999 to 2011 versus the average of yield from1978 to 2011. The largest maize yield reduction occurred in Beijing (2499 kg ha−1 yr−1), Jilin (2180 kg ha−1 yr−1), Tianjing (1923 kg ha−1 yr−1), and Heilongjiang (1791 kg ha−1 yr−1), and the maize yield anomaly was significantly correlated with the annual precipitation over the entire study area. Our results revealed that recent climate change, especially drought‐induced water stress, is the dominant cause of the reduction in the terrestrial carbon sink over northern China.

22 September 2014 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WCWenwen Cai
Wenwen Cai
WYWenping Yuan
Wenping Yuan
SLShunlin Liang
Shunlin Liang
SLShuguang Liu
Shuguang Liu
WDWenjie Dong
Wenjie Dong
Haicheng ZHANGHaicheng ZHANG
Haicheng ZHANG
Terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) is the largest global CO2 flux and determines other ecosystem carbon cycle variables. Light use efficiency (LUE) models may have the most potential to adequately address the spatial and temporal dynamics of GPP, but recent studies have shown large model differences in GPP simulations. In this study, we investigated the GPP differences in the spatial and temporal patterns derived from seven widely used LUE models at the global scale. The result shows that the global annual GPP estimates over the period 2000–2010 varied from 95.10 to 139.71 Pg C∙yr−1 among models. The spatial and temporal variation of global GPP differs substantially between models, due to different model structures and dominant environmental drivers. In almost all models, water availability dominates the interannual variability of GPP over large vegetated areas. Solar radiation and air temperature are not the primary controlling factors for interannual variability of global GPP estimates for most models. The disagreement among the current LUE models highlights the need for further model improvement to quantify the global carbon cycle.

12 August 2012 in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJing Peng
Jing Peng
WDWenjie Dong
Wenjie Dong
WYWenping Yuan
Wenping Yuan
YZYong Zhang
Yong Zhang

4 September 2009 in Climatic Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WDWenjie Dong
Wenjie Dong
YJYundi Jiang
Yundi Jiang
SYSong Yang
Song Yang

26 February 2016 in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TWTing Wei
Ting Wei
WDWenjie Dong
Wenjie Dong
QYQing Yan
Qing Yan
JCJieming Chou
Jieming Chou
ZYZhiyong Yang
Zhiyong Yang
DTDi Tian
Di Tian