Roberta  Guglielmetti Mugion

Dr. Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion

Department of Business Studies, University of Roma Tre, Via Ostiense, 159, 00154 Roma RM, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 June 2021 in Journal of Service Theory and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMaria Giovina Pasca
Maria Giovina Pasca
MMaria Francesca Renzi
Maria Francesca Renzi
Laura Di PietroLaura Di Pietro
Laura Di Pietro
Roberta  Guglielmetti MugionRoberta Guglielmetti Mugion
Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion
Purpose: The present study aims to synthesize and conceptualize, through a systematic literature review (SLR), the current state of gamification knowledge in the tourism and hospitality (T&H) sector, providing a roadmap for future research recommendations for service research and practice.Design/methodology/approach: The research is based on a systematic literature review and adopts a systematic quantitative approach to summarize existing evidence on gamification usage in the T&H sector, focusing on relevant service literature on gamification. The authors analyze 36 papers published between 2011 and 2019.Findings: The authors synthesize existing knowledge into five themes describing gamification's role in T&H (Edutainment, Sustainable behavior, Engagement factors, Service provider-generated content and User-generated reviews). Then, a cross-analysis of the five themes reveals the pivotal elements (affordances, behavioral and psychological outcomes, and benefits) generated by gamification mechanics in T&H, simultaneously highlighting potential implications and relevant insights for service literature. The review identifies critical issues affecting gamification research and provides a future research agenda, considering opportunities for T&H and service research.Originality/value: The study provides the first SLR investigating gamification in T&H. The findings present potential implications and relevant insights for T&H contributing to the construction of a more holistic understanding of gamification adoption in service research.

1 July 2015 in Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Laura Di PietroLaura Di Pietro
Laura Di Pietro
Roberta  Guglielmetti MugionRoberta Guglielmetti Mugion
Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion
GMG. Mattia
G. Mattia
MRM.F. Renzi
M.F. Renzi
MTMartina Toni
Martina Toni

15 August 2016 in Journal of Service Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KAKotaiba Aal
Kotaiba Aal
Laura Di PietroLaura Di Pietro
Laura Di Pietro
BEBo Edvardsson
Bo Edvardsson
MRMaria Francesca Renzi
Maria Francesca Renzi
Roberta  Guglielmetti MugionRoberta Guglielmetti Mugion
Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to extend the understanding of innovation in service ecosystems by focussing on the role of values resonance in relation to the integration of brands, service systems and experience rooms.Design/methodology/approach: – An empirical, explorative case study of an innovative service system is carried out using a narrative approach and presented in the form of a saga.Findings: – Insights gleaned from the empirical study are used for conceptual developments. Analysis of the empirical case study is presented as four lessons linked to values, brands, service systems and experience rooms.Originality/value: – The paper extends a conceptual framework of innovative resource integration in service ecosystems. The paper also contributes four propositions to inform theory: values resonance is a basis for service innovation, the innovative integration of brands based on values resonance can foster innovation, the integration of resources across service system boundaries grounded in values resonance can enable innovation and the integration of experience rooms into a coherent servicescape based on values resonance can support novel forms of resource integration and value co-creation efforts in service ecosystems.

28 August 2014 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Laura Di PietroLaura Di Pietro
Laura Di Pietro
Roberta  Guglielmetti MugionRoberta Guglielmetti Mugion
Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion
MMaria Francesca Renzi
Maria Francesca Renzi
MTMartina Toni
Martina Toni
The main purpose of this study is to propose a visitor centric perspective that can support museums towards sustainability. The main premise of this study is due to a concept of economic and social sustainability of museums, defined as the possession of sufficient resources to maintain the existence of an organization, and achieve their goals in the future, ensuring a certain flow of visitors. A great number of museums are characterized by a low number of visits; therefore, in order to become sustainable, museums should pay attention to audience and its internal diversity. In this way, a cultural site can plan tailored strategies to increase the number of visits and re-visits and to achieve community support. For this reason it is necessary to understand the cultural needs of visitors, acquiring appropriate monitoring tools, such as qualitative and quantitative ones. Generally, quantitative analyses are more reliable and complete, even if they require a considerable number of observations for the reliability of the results. Moreover, qualitative analysis provides more in depth information, even if their data do not allow us to make generalizations. The qualitative and quantitative methods for the detection of satisfaction are usually used separately, but their integration may bring significant added value in terms of the wealth of information. This study follows the analysis of the potential of the integration of qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques customized with respect to different types of targets. The results of the experimentation performed on ethnographic museums shows a consistency of the results obtained by the two different tools that increase the capacity information of survey instruments.

8 January 2018 in Journal of Service Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Laura Di PietroLaura Di Pietro
Laura Di Pietro
BEBo Edvardsson
Bo Edvardsson
JRJavier Reynoso
Javier Reynoso
MMaria Francesca Renzi
Maria Francesca Renzi
MTMartina Toni
Martina Toni
Roberta  Guglielmetti MugionRoberta Guglielmetti Mugion
Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore why innovative service ecosystems scale up, using a service-dominant logic lens. The focus is on identifying the key drivers of the scaling-up process as the basis for a new conceptual framework on the scaling up of service innovations.Design/methodology/approach: An inductive research design is used to zoom in on two innovative service ecosystems, Eataly and KidZania, to identify the key drivers that can explain why innovations scale up. For both companies, the triangulation of semi-structured interviews, archival sources and in-store observations is used as complementary data sets. Multiple investigators and multiple coders have been involved in the data collection, coding process and analysis.Findings: An extended conceptualization of service innovation is obtained, grounded in a framework of four drivers of scaling up: effectuation as the basis for creating the value proposition; sensing and adapting to local contexts; the reconfiguration and alignment of resources and forms for collaboration between actors; and values’ resonance.Originality/value: This study represents one of the first empirical investigations of the key drivers of the scaling up process of service innovations. The paper contributes with a conceptualization of service innovation and why scaling-up processes emerge, emphasizing the existence of multiple constellations of four drivers.

8 February 2021 in BMC Health Services Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Roberta  Guglielmetti MugionRoberta Guglielmetti Mugion
Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion
MPMaria Giovina Pasca
Maria Giovina Pasca
LPLaura Di Di Pietro
Laura Di Di Pietro
MRMaria Francesca Renzi
Maria Francesca Renzi
Background: The paper aims to understand the main antecedents related to the blood donation propensity related to both donors and non-donors. With our research, we will analyse the two perspectives to identify similarities and differences concentrating on the Italian context. Blood is a vital resource that strongly affects every national healthcare system’s efficacy and sustainability and the system’s ability to achieve the goal of universal coverage.Methods: The purpose of this paper is to understand the main antecedents of citizens’ blood donation intention and the propensity to encourage communication about blood donation among both donors and non-donors. The Theory of Planned Behaviour is adopted as a theoretical lens. An empirical investigation was performed in Italy, adopting a mixed methods research design. First, a qualitative analysis was carried out through 30 in-depth interviews. Then, a survey was used to quantitatively investigate the intention to donate among both donors (N = 173) and non-donors (N = 87). A conceptual model was developed and tested through Structural Equation Modelling, developing a multi-group approach.Results: The present study confirms the relations proposed by the Theory of Planned Behaviour, even though some differences between the two groups are shown. The construct Information and Communication is crucial for donors, non-donors, whereas for non-donor inhibitors is vital. Service quality has an impact on the propensity to recommend and communicate the value of blood donation.Conclusion: This paper reveals the main differences between donor and non-donor perspectives. Fruitful insights for enhancing blood donation awareness are provided.