DFFRY (the Y-linked homologue of the DFFRX Drosophila fat-facets related X gene) maps to proximal Yq11.2 within the interval defining the AZFa spermatogenic phenotype. The complete coding region of DFFRY has been sequenced and shows 89% identity to the X-linked gene at the nucleotide level. In common with DFFRX, the potential amino acid sequence contains the conserved Cys and His domains characteristic of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases. The human DFFRY mRNA is expressed in a wide range of adult and embryonic tissues, including testis, whereas the homologous mouse Dffry gene is expressed specifically in the testis. Analysis of three azoospermic male patients has shown that DFFRY is deleted from the Y chromosome in these individuals. Two patients have a testicular phenotype which resembles Sertoli cell-only syndrome, and the third diminished spermatogenesis. In all three patients, the deletions extend from close to the 3′ end into the gene, removing the entire coding sequence of DFFRY. The mouse Dffry gene maps to the Sxr^b deletion interval on the short arm of the mouse Y chromosome and its expression in mouse testis can first be detected between 7.5 and 10.5 days after birth when type A and B spermatogonia and pre-leptotene and leptotene spermatocytes are present.

The utility of cancer cell lines depends largely on their accurate classification, commonly based on histopathological diagnosis of the cancers from which they were derived. However, because cancer is often heterogeneous, the cell line, which also has the opportunity to alter in vitro , may not be representative. Yet without the overall architecture used in histopathological diagnosis of fresh samples, reclassification of cell lines has been difficult. Gene-expression profiling accurately reproduces histopathological classification and is readily applicable to cell lines. Here, we compare the gene-expression profiles of 41 cell lines with 44 tumors from lung cancer. These profiles were generated after hybridization of samples to four replicate 7,685-element cDNA microarrays. After removal of genes that were uniformly up- or down-regulated in fresh compared with cell-line samples, cluster analysis produced four major branch groups. Within these major branches, fresh tumor samples essentially clustered according to pathological type, and further subclusters were seen for both adenocarcinoma (AC) and small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Four of eight squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cell lines clustered with fresh SCC, and 11 of 13 SCLC cell lines grouped with fresh SCLC. In contrast, although none of the 11 AC cell lines clustered with AC tumors, three clustered with SCC tumors and six with SCLC tumors. Although it is possible that preexisting SCC or SCLC cells are being selected from AC tumors after establishment of cell lines, we propose that, even in situ , AC will ultimately progress toward one of two poorly differentiated phenotypes with expression profiles resembling SCC or SCLC.