(Marianne) M.E. Van Bochove

Dr. (Marianne) M.E. Van Bochove

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 November 2016 in Current Sociology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
(B(Marianne) M.E. Van Bochove
(Marianne) M.E. Van Bochove
ETEvelien Tonkens
Evelien Tonkens
LVLoes Verplanke
Loes Verplanke
SRSuzanne Roggeveen
Suzanne Roggeveen
Shifts from professionals to volunteers are observed across national contexts and in various types of public services, particularly in long-term care and social work. This article examines how professionals and volunteers in the Netherlands perform boundary work to construct, maintain and dissolve boundaries between them in the context of social service reform. Two types of boundary work were found: demarcation work and welcoming work. Demarcation work relates to a situation where differences in knowledge, authority and reliability between professionals and volunteers are emphasised. Welcoming work involves the efforts of professionals to welcome specific volunteers to their professional domain. This study examines the implications of the second type of boundary work for structural characteristics of the social service sector. It concludes that although welcoming work can lead to deprofessionalisation, it can also promote the professionalisation of nurses and social workers.

10 December 2013 in Population, Space and Place
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
(B(Marianne) M.E. Van Bochove
(Marianne) M.E. Van Bochove
GEGodfried Engbersen
Godfried Engbersen

KRKatja Rusinovic
Katja Rusinovic
(B(Marianne) M.E. Van Bochove
(Marianne) M.E. Van Bochove
JSJolien van de Sande
Jolien van de Sande
Senior co-housing communities offer an in-between solution for older people who do not want to live in an institutional setting but prefer the company of their age peers. Residents of co-housing communities live in their own apartments but undertake activities together and support one another. This paper adds to the literature by scrutinizing the benefits and drawbacks of senior co-housing, with special focus on the forms and limits of social support and the implications for the experience of loneliness. Qualitative fieldwork was conducted in eight co-housing communities in the Netherlands, consisting of document analysis, interviews, focus groups, and observations. The research shows that co-housing communities offer social contacts, social control, and instrumental and emotional support. Residents set boundaries regarding the frequency and intensity of support. The provided support partly relieves residents’ adult children from caregiving duties but does not substitute formal and informal care. Due to their access to contacts and support, few residents experience social loneliness. Co-housing communities can potentially also alleviate emotional loneliness, but currently, this happens to a limited degree. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for enhancing the benefits and reducing the drawbacks of senior co-housing.


5 April 2018 in Journal of Social Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IVImrat Verhoeven
Imrat Verhoeven
(B(Marianne) M.E. Van Bochove
(Marianne) M.E. Van Bochove
Welfare states increasingly activate citizens in the provision of care and welfare services, expecting them to take over certain parts of professional work. The consequences of this ‘volunteer responsibilisation’ for front-line workers’ professionalism have not been studied extensively. Professionalism may be pointed in another direction, from professional self-control or organisational forms of control based on management criteria toward forms of embedded control in which professional work is defined in interaction with all kinds of ‘outsiders’, including volunteers. In this paper we analyse how front-line workers cope with such shifts in care and welfare provision. We find that they move away from frail volunteers, move toward vigorous volunteers, and move against policy makers.