Myocardial inflammation is an important cause of cardiovascular morbidity and sudden cardiac death in athletes. The relationship between sports practice and myocardial inflammation is complex, and recent data from studies concerning cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and endomyocardial biopsy have substantially added to our understanding of the challenges encountered in the comprehensive care of athletes with myocarditis or inflammatory cardiomyopathy (ICM). In this review, we provide an overview of the current knowledge on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of myocarditis, ICM, and myopericarditis/perimyocarditis in athletes, with a special emphasis on arrhythmias, patient-tailored therapies, and sports eligibility issues.

Athlete’s heart (AH) is the result of morphological and functional cardiac modifications due to long-lasting athletic training. Athletes can develop very marked structural myocardial changes, which may simulate or cover unknown cardiomyopathies. The differential diagnosis between AH and cardiomyopathy is necessary to prevent the risk of catastrophic events, such as sudden cardiac death, but it can be a challenging task. The improvement of the imaging modalities and the introduction of the new technologies in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiac computed tomography (CCT) can allow overcoming this challenge. Therefore, the radiologist, specialized in cardiac imaging, could have a pivotal role in the differential diagnosis between structural adaptative changes observed in the AH and pathological anomalies of cardiomyopathies. In this review, we summarize the main CMR and CCT techniques to evaluate the cardiac morphology, function, and tissue characterization, and we analyze the imaging features of the AH and the key differences with the main cardiomyopathies.

Angina is the main symptom of ischemic heart disease; mirroring a mismatch between oxygen supply and demand. Epicardial coronary stenoses are only responsible for nearly half of the patients presenting with angina; whereas in several cases; symptoms may underlie coronary vasomotor disorders; such as microvascular dysfunction or epicardial spasm. Various medications have been proven to improve the prognosis and quality of life; representing the treatment of choice in stable angina and leaving revascularization only in particular coronary anatomies or poorly controlled symptoms despite optimal medical therapy. Antianginal medications aim to reduce the oxygen supply-demand mismatch and are generally effective in improving symptoms; quality of life; effort tolerance and time to ischemia onset and may improve prognosis in selected populations. Since antianginal medications have different mechanisms of action and side effects; their use should be tailored according to patient history and potential drug-drug interactions. Angina with non-obstructed coronary arteries patients should be phenotyped with invasive assessment and treated accordingly. Patients with refractory angina represent a higher-risk population in which some therapeutic options are available to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life; but robust data from large randomized controlled trials are still lacking.

Background: Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) may be caused by an acute and reversible myocardial injury, a chronic and irreversible myocardial damage, or a primary ventricular arrhythmia. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may identify myocardial edema (ME), which denotes acute and reversible myocardial damage. We evaluated the arrhythmic outcome of SCA survivors during follow‐up and tested the prognostic role of ME. Methods and Results: We included a consecutive series of 101 (71% men, median age 47 years) SCA survivors from 9 collaborative centers who underwent early (<1 month) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and received an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD). On T2‐weighted sequences, ME was found in 18 of 101 (18%) patients. According to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings, the arrhythmic SCA was ascribed to acute myocardial injury (either ischemic [n=10] or inflammatory [n=8]), to chronic structural heart diseases (ischemic heart disease [n=11], cardiomyopathy [n=20], or other [n=23]), or to primarily arrhythmic syndrome (n=29). During a follow‐up of 47 months (28 to 67 months), 24 of 101 (24%) patients received an appropriate ICD intervention. ME was associated with a significantly higher survival free from both any ICD interventions (log‐rank=0.04) and ICD shocks (log‐rank=0.03) and remained an independent predictor of better arrhythmic outcome after adjustment for left ventricular ejection fraction and late gadolinium enhancement. The risk of appropriate ICD intervention was unrelated to the type of underlying heart disease. Conclusions: ME on early cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, which denotes an acute and transient arrhythmogenic substrate, predicted a favorable long‐term arrhythmic outcome of SCA survivors. These findings may have a substantial impact on future guidelines on the management of SCA survivors.

Tachycardiomyopathy (TCM) is an underestimated cause of reversible left ventricle dysfunction. The aim of this study was to identify the predictors of recurrence and incidence of major cardiovascular events in TCM patients without underlying structural heart disease (pure TCM). The prospective, observational study enrolled all consecutive pure TCM patients. The diagnosis was suspected in patients admitted for heart failure (HF) with a reduced ejection fraction and concomitant persistent arrhythmia. Pure TCM was confirmed after the clinical and echocardiographic recovery during follow-up. From 107 pure TCM patients (9% of all HF admission, the median follow-up 22.6 months), 17 recurred, 51 were hospitalized for cardiovascular reasons, two suffered from thromboembolic events and one died. The diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS, hazard ratio (HR) 5.44), brain natriuretic peptide on admission (HR 1.01 for each pg/mL) and the heart rate at discharge (HR 1.05 for each bpm) were all independent predictors of TCM recurrence. The left ventricular ejection fraction at discharge (HR 0.96 for each%) and the heart rate at discharge (HR 1.02 for each bpm) resulted as independent predictors of cardiovascular-related hospitalization. Pure TCM is more common than previously thought and associated with a good long-term survival but recurrences and hospitalizations are frequent. Reversing OSAS and controlling the heart rate could prevent TCM-related complications.

Albeit often asymptomatic, heart involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) represents a negative prognostic factor, accounting for nearly one-fourth of all deaths. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is accurate in detecting heart involvement in patients with SSc and no overt cardiac disease and allows early detection and longitudinal monitoring, but its association with clinical endpoints has not been tested so far. The primary outcome was the association between left and right GLS and mortality for all causes. The secondary outcome was the association between left and right GLS and hospitalizations. A prospective longitudinal study enrolling all consecutive patients with SSc without structural heart disease or previous cardiovascular event. A total of 164 patients were enrolled, of whom 19 (11.5%) died during follow-up and 48 (29.3%) were hospitalized. Both left (LV) and right ventricle (RV) GLS at enrolment were independently associated with an increased risk of death for all causes and hospitalizations. Patients with biventricular GLS impairment, respectively, had a 4.2-, 4.9-, and 13.9-fold increased risk of death when compared with patients with only LV, only RV, or no impairment (P < 0.001). The incidence of hospitalization in patients with biventricular GLS impairment was nearly four times higher when compared with patients with only LV or only RV impairment, and nine times higher when compared with normal biventricular GLS (P < 0.001). Biventricular GLS is associated with an increased risk of death and hospitalization in patients with SSc during a median of 3-year follow-up, acting as a reliable and accurate prognostic tool in everyday practice. All-cause death in patients with systemic sclerosis and time to death, according to left and right global longitudinal strain. GLS, global longitudinal strain; SSc, systemic sclerosis.