Our poor understanding of the intricate biology of cancer and the limited availability of preclinical models that faithfully recapitulate the complexity of tumors are primary contributors to the high failure rate of novel therapeutics in oncology clinical studies. To address this need, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) platforms have been widely deployed and have reached a point of development where we can critically review their utility to model and interrogate relevant clinical scenarios, including tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution, contributions of the tumor microenvironment, identification of novel drugs and biomarkers, and mechanisms of drug resistance. Colorectal cancer (CRC) constitutes a unique case to illustrate clinical perspectives revealed by PDX studies, as they overcome limitations intrinsic to conventional ex vivo models. Furthermore, the success of molecularly annotated "Avatar" models for co-clinical trials in other diseases suggests that this approach may provide an additional opportunity to improve clinical decisions, including opportunities for precision targeted therapeutics, for patients with CRC in real time. Although critical weaknesses have been identified with regard to the ability of PDX models to predict clinical outcomes, for now, they are certainly the model of choice for preclinical studies in CRC. Ongoing multi-institutional efforts to develop and share large-scale, well-annotated PDX resources aim to maximize their translational potential. This review comprehensively surveys the current status of PDX models in translational CRC research and discusses the opportunities and considerations for future PDX development.

Background & Aims Understanding the mechanisms by which tumors adapt to therapy is critical for developing effective combination therapeutic approaches to improve clinical outcomes for patients with cancer. Methods To identify promising and clinically actionable targets for managing colorectal cancer (CRC), we conducted a patient-centered functional genomics platform that includes approximately 200 genes and paired this with a high-throughput drug screen that includes 262 compounds in four patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from patients with CRC. Results Both screening methods identified exportin 1 (XPO1) inhibitors as drivers of DNA damage-induced lethality in CRC. Molecular characterization of the cellular response to XPO1 inhibition uncovered an adaptive mechanism that limited the duration of response in TP53-mutated, but not in TP53-wild-type CRC models. Comprehensive proteomic and transcriptomic characterization revealed that the ATM/ATR-CHK1/2 axes were selectively engaged in TP53-mutant CRC cells upon XPO1 inhibitor treatment and that this response was required for adapting to therapy and escaping cell death. Administration of KPT-8602, an XPO1 inhibitor, followed by AZD-6738, an ATR inhibitor, resulted in dramatic antitumor effects and prolonged survival in TP53-mutant models of CRC. Conclusions Our findings anticipate tremendous therapeutic benefit and support the further evaluation of XPO1 inhibitors, especially in combination with DNA damage checkpoint inhibitors, to elicit an enduring clinical response in patients with CRC harboring TP53 mutations.

Cancer stem cells (CSC) are a subpopulation of tumor cells with properties of high tumorigenicity and drug resistance, which lead to recurrence and poor prognosis. Although a better understanding of CSC is essential for developing cancer therapies, scarcity of the CSC population has hindered such analyses. The aim of the present study was to elucidate whether the E‐cadherin‐Fc chimera protein (E‐cad‐Fc) enhances cancer stem‐like properties because studies show that soluble E‐cadherin stimulates human epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) and downstream signaling pathways that are reported to play a crucial role in CSC. For this purpose, we used ornithine decarboxylase (ODC)‐degron–transduced (Degron(+)) KM12SM cells as a CSC model that retains relatively low CSC properties. Compared to cultures without E‐cad‐Fc treatment, we found that E‐cad‐Fc treatment further suppressed proteasome activity and largely enhanced cancer stem‐like properties of ODC‐degron–transduced KM12SM cells. These results include increased expression of stem cell markers Lgr5, Bmi‐1, SOX9, CD44, and CD44v9, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), and enhancement of robust spheroid formation, and chemoresistance to 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) and oxaliplatin (L‐OHP). These effects could be attributed to activation of the EGFR pathway as identified by extensive phosphorylation of EGFR, ERK, PI3K, AKT, and mTOR. In SW480 cells, E‐cad‐Fc matrix induced some CSC markers such as CD44v9 and ALDH. We also found that E‐cad‐Fc matrix showed high efficiency of inducing mesenchymal changes in colon cancer cells. Our data suggest that the E‐cad‐Fc matrix may enhance CSC properties such as enhancement of chemoresistance and sphere formation.

Aim: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in Japan.Methods: This prospective, multicenter, open‐label, single‐arm phase II trial was conducted at five institutions. The key eligibility criteria were age ≥ 20 years, LARC within 12 cm from the anal verge, and cT3‐4N0M0 or TanyN+M0 at the time of diagnosis that enabled curative resection. Preoperative short‐course radiation therapy (SCRT) 5 Gy × 5 days (total 25 Gy) + CAPOX (six courses) followed by total mesorectum excision (TME) was the treatment protocol. Non‐operative management (NOM) was allowed if clinical complete response (cCR) was obtained in the preoperative evaluation. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate.Results: Thirty patients (male, n = 26; female, n = 4; median age, 62.5 [44–74] years; cT [T2, n = 1; T3, n = 25; T4, n = 4]; cN [N0, n = 13; N1, n = 13; N2, n = 4]) were enrolled. The final analysis included 30 patients in total. The completion rates were 100% for SCRT and 83% for CAPOX. TME and NOM were performed in 20 and seven patients, respectively. pCR was observed in six patients (30% [95% CI 14.0%–50.8%]). The primary endpoint was met. pCR+cCR was observed in 13 (43.3%) patients. There were no treatment‐related deaths. Grade ≥3 (CTCAE ver. 5.0) adverse events (≥20%), including diarrhea (23.3%) and neutropenia (23.3%). The median follow‐up period was 15.6 (10.5–22.8) months, with no recurrence or regrowth in NOM.Conclusions: ENSEMBLE‐1 demonstrated satisfactory pCR and cCR, and well‐tolerated safety of TNT for patients with LARC in Japan.

This study aimed to analyze circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We designed a dielectrophoresis-based micropore system and tested its cell capture with HT29 colon cancer cells. Then, blood samples were drawn from 24 patients with stages II-IV CRC. Mononuclear cells were isolated and loaded into the micropore system. Single cells were positioned into small pores with dielectrophoresis. After labeling the cells with the appropriate antibodies, tumor-like cells were collected with an automated micromanipulator. We collected 43 CTCs from 15 out of 24 patient samples. The presence of CTC was significantly associated with ling metastasis. We performed whole genome amplification, followed by PCR and Sanger sequencing, to examine the point mutations in the KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA genes. This mutation analysis was successfully performed in 35 cells. Among the 14 cytokeratin (CK)-positive cells, we found PIK3CA mutations in three cells (21%) from two patients. Among the 21 CK-negative cells, we found a KRAS mutation in one cell (5%) from one patient and a PIK3CA mutation in one cell (5%) from one patient. It is noteworthy that these mutations were not detected in the corresponding primary tumors. In conclusion, dielectrophoresis-based capture in a micropore system was useful for detecting both CK-positive and CK-negative CTCs. This simple method could be applied to various tumor types.