Andrew Chantry

Dr. Andrew Chantry

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 July 2005 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWStephen J Wicks
Stephen J Wicks
KHKatherine Haros
Katherine Haros
MMMarjorie Maillard
Marjorie Maillard
LSLing Song
Ling Song
RCRobert E Cohen
Robert E Cohen
ACAndrew Chantry
Andrew Chantry

24 January 2011 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSS M Soond
S M Soond
ACAndrew Chantry
Andrew Chantry
Ubiquitin-dependent mechanisms have emerged as essential regulatory elements controlling cellular levels of Smads and TGFβ-dependent biological outputs such as epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). In this study, we identify a HECT E3 ubiquitin ligase known as WWP2 (Full-length WWP2-FL), together with two WWP2 isoforms (N-terminal, WWP2-N; C-terminal WWP2-C), as novel Smad-binding partners. We show that WWP2-FL interacts exclusively with Smad2, Smad3 and Smad7 in the TGFβ pathway. Interestingly, the WWP2-N isoform interacts with Smad2 and Smad3, whereas WWP2-C interacts only with Smad7. In addition, WWP2-FL and WWP2-C have a preference for Smad7 based on protein turnover and ubiquitination studies. Unexpectedly, we also find that WWP2-N, which lacks the HECT ubiquitin ligase domain, can also interact with WWP2-FL in a TGFβ-regulated manner and activate endogenous WWP2 ubiquitin ligase activity causing degradation of unstimulated Smad2 and Smad3. Consistent with our protein interaction data, overexpression and knockdown approaches reveal that WWP2 isoforms differentially modulate TGFβ-dependent transcription and EMT. Finally, we show that selective disruption of WWP2 interactions with inhibitory Smad7 can stabilise Smad7 protein levels and prevent TGFβ-induced EMT. Collectively, our data suggest that WWP2-N can stimulate WWP2-FL leading to increased activity against unstimulated Smad2 and Smad3, and that Smad7 is a preferred substrate for WWP2-FL and WWP2-C following prolonged TGFβ stimulation. Significantly, this is the first report of an interdependent biological role for distinct HECT E3 ubiquitin ligase isoforms, and highlights an entirely novel regulatory paradigm that selectively limits the level of inhibitory and activating Smads.

1 October 2006 in Biochemical Society Transactions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWS.J. Wicks
S.J. Wicks
TGT. Grocott
T. Grocott
KHK. Haros
K. Haros
MMM. Maillard
M. Maillard
PDP. Ten Dijke
P. Ten Dijke
ACAndrew Chantry
Andrew Chantry
TGF-β (transforming growth factor-β) signals through serine/threonine kinase receptors and intracellular Smad transcription factors. An important regulatory step involves specific ubiquitination by Smurfs (Smad–ubiquitin regulatory factors), members of the HECT (homologous to E6-associated protein C-terminus) ubiquitin ligase family, which mediate the proteasomal degradation of Smads and/or receptors. Recently, we have defined a novel interaction between Smads and UCH37 (ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase 37), a DUB (de-ubiquitinating enzyme) that could potentially counteract Smurf-mediated ubiquitination. We have demonstrated specific interactions between UCH37 and inhibitory Smad7, as well as weaker associations with Smad2 and Smad3. Importantly, Smad7 can act as an adaptor able to recruit UCH37 to the type I TGF-β receptor. Consequently, UCH37 dramatically up-regulates TGF-β-dependent gene expression by de-ubiquitinating and stabilizing the type I TGF-β receptor. Our findings suggest that competing effects of ubiquitin ligases and DUBs in complex with Smad7 can serve to fine-tune responses to TGF-βs under various physiological and pathological conditions. Studies are currently under way using activity-based HA (haemagglutinin)-tagged ubiquitin probes to identify the full spectrum of DUBs that impact on Smad/TGF-β signalling activity.

23 January 2007 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TGTimothy Grocott
Timothy Grocott
VFVictoria Frost
Victoria Frost
MMMarjorie Maillard
Marjorie Maillard
TJTerje Johansen
Terje Johansen
GWGrant N. Wheeler
Grant N. Wheeler
ACAndrew Chantry
Andrew Chantry
Pax6 transcription is under the control of two main promoters (P0 and P1), and these are autoregulated by Pax6. Additionally, Pax6 expression is under the control of the TGFβ superfamily, although the precise mechanisms of such regulation are not understood. The effect of TGFβ on Pax6 expression was studied in the FHL124 lens epithelial cell line and was found to cause up to a 50% reduction in Pax6 mRNA levels within 24 h. Analysis of luciferase reporters showed that Pax6 autoregulation of the P1 promoter, and its induction of a synthetic promoter encoding six paired domain-binding sites, were significantly repressed by both an activated TGFβ receptor and TGFβ ligand stimulation. Subsequently, a novel Pax6 binding site in P1 was shown to be necessary for autoregulation, indicating a direct influence of Pax6 protein on P1. In transfected cells, and endogenously in FHL124 cells, Pax6 co-immunoprecipitated with Smad3 following TGFβ receptor activation, while in GST pull-down experiments, the MH1 domain of Smad3 was observed binding the RED sub-domain of the Pax6 paired domain. Finally, in DNA adsorption assays, activated Smad3 inhibited Pax6 from binding the consensus paired domain recognition sequence. We hypothesize that the Pax6 autoregulatory loop is targeted for repression by the TGFβ/Smad pathway, and conclude that this involves diminished paired domain DNA-binding function resulting from a ligand-dependant interaction between Pax6 and Smad3.

6 November 2018 in Chemistry – A European Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJessica E. Watt
Jessica E. Watt
GHGregory R. Hughes
Gregory R. Hughes
SWSamuel Walpole
Samuel Walpole
SMSerena Monaco
Serena Monaco
GSG. Richard Stephenson
G. Richard Stephenson
ACAndrew Chantry
Andrew Chantry
We have screened small molecule libraries specifically for inhibitors that target WWP2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase associated with tumour outgrowth and spread. Selected hits demonstrated dose‐dependent WWP2 inhibition, low micromolar IC50 values, and inhibition of PTEN substrate‐specific ubiquitination. Binding to WWP2 was confirmed by ligand‐based NMR spectroscopy. Furthermore, we used a combination of STD NMR, the recently developed DEEP‐STD NMR approach, and docking calculations, to propose for the first time an NMR‐validated 3D molecular model of a WWP2‐inhibitor complex. These first generation WWP2 inhibitors provide a molecular framework for informing organic synthetic approaches to improve activity and selectivity.

1 October 2021 in Drug Discovery Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GHGregory R. Hughes
Gregory R. Hughes
ADAshley P. Dudey
Ashley P. Dudey
AHAndrew Michael Hemmings
Andrew Michael Hemmings
ACAndrew Chantry
Andrew Chantry