Boris Y. Zaslavsky

Boris Y. Zaslavsky


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

49Years (1978-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 November 2014 in FEBS Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Vladimir N. UverskyVladimir N. Uversky
Vladimir N. Uversky
Irina M. KuznetsovaIrina M. Kuznetsova
Irina M. Kuznetsova
KTKonstantin K. Turoverov
Konstantin K. Turoverov
BZBoris Y. Zaslavsky
Boris Y. Zaslavsky

14 January 2015 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Irina M. KuznetsovaIrina M. Kuznetsova
Irina M. Kuznetsova
BZBoris Y. Zaslavsky
Boris Y. Zaslavsky
LBLeonid Breydo
Leonid Breydo
KTKonstantin K. Turoverov
Konstantin K. Turoverov
Vladimir N. UverskyVladimir N. Uversky
Vladimir N. Uversky
Macromolecular crowding is known to affect protein folding, binding of small molecules, interaction with nucleic acids, enzymatic activity, protein-protein interactions, and protein aggregation. Although for a long time it was believed that the major mechanism of the action of crowded environments on structure, folding, thermodynamics, and function of a protein can be described in terms of the excluded volume effects, it is getting clear now that other factors originating from the presence of high concentrations of “inert” macromolecules in crowded solution should definitely be taken into account to draw a more complete picture of a protein in a crowded milieu. This review shows that in addition to the excluded volume effects important players of the crowded environments are viscosity, perturbed diffusion, direct physical interactions between the crowding agents and proteins, soft interactions, and, most importantly, the effects of crowders on solvent properties.

1 August 2019 in Trends in Biochemical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KTKonstantin K. Turoverov
Konstantin K. Turoverov
IKIrina M. Kuznetsova
Irina M. Kuznetsova
Alexander FoninAlexander Fonin
Alexander Fonin
ADApril L. Darling
April L. Darling
BZBoris Y. Zaslavsky
Boris Y. Zaslavsky
Vladimir N. UverskyVladimir N. Uversky
Vladimir N. Uversky


4 June 2019 in Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADApril L. Darling
April L. Darling
BZBoris Y. Zaslavsky
Boris Y. Zaslavsky
Vladimir N. UverskyVladimir N. Uversky
Vladimir N. Uversky
The visible outcome of liquid-liquid phase transitions (LLPTs) in cells is the formation and disintegration of various proteinaceous membrane-less organelles (PMLOs). Although LLPTs and related PMLOs have been observed in living cells for over 200 years, the physiological functions of these transitions (also known as liquid-liquid phase separation, LLPS) are just starting to be understood. While unveiling the functionality of these transitions is important, they have come into light more recently due to the association of abnormal LLPTs with various pathological conditions. In fact, several maladies, such as various cancers, different neurodegenerative diseases, and cardiovascular diseases, are known to be associated with either aberrant LLPTs or some pathological transformations within the resultant PMLOs. Here, we will highlight both the physiological functions of cellular liquid-liquid phase transitions as well as the pathological consequences produced through both dysregulated biogenesis of PMLOs and the loss of their dynamics. We will also discuss the potential downstream toxic effects of proteins that are involved in pathological formations.

1 April 1988 in European Journal of Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMVadim V. Mozhaev
Vadim V. Mozhaev
VŠVirginius A. Šikšnis
Virginius A. Šikšnis
NMNikolay S. Melik‐Nubarov
Nikolay S. Melik‐Nubarov
NGNida Z. Galkantaite
Nida Z. Galkantaite
GDGervydas J. Denis
Gervydas J. Denis
KMKarel Martinek
Karel Martinek
This paper experimentally verifies the idea presented earlier that the contact of nonpolar clusters located on the surface of protein molecules with water destabilizes proteins. It is demonstrated that protein stabilization can be achieved by artificial hydrophilization of the surface area of protein globules by chemical modification. Two experimental systems are studied for the verification of the hydrophilization approach. The surface tyrosine residues of trypsin are transformed to aminotyrosines using a two‐step modification procedure: nitration by tetranitromethane followed by reduction with sodium dithionite. The modified enzyme is much more stable against irreversible thermoinactivation: the stabilizing effect increases with the number of aminotyrosine residues in trypsin and the modified enzyme can become even 100 times more stable than the native one. α‐Chymotrypsin is covalently modified by treatment with anhydrides or chloroanhydrides of aromatic carboxylic acids. As a result, different numbers of additional carboxylic groups (up to five depending on the structure of the modifying reagent) are introduced into each Lys residue modified. Acylation of all available amino groups of α‐chymotrypsin by cyclic anhydrides of pyromellitic and mellitic acids results in a substantial hydrophilization of the protein as estimated by partitioning in an aqueous Ficoll‐400/Dextran‐70 biphasic system. These modified enzyme preparations are extremely stable against irreversible thermal inactivation at elevated temperatures (65 – 98°C); their thermostability is practically equal to the stability of proteolytic enzymes from extremely thermophilic bacteria, the most stable proteinases known to date.