Fall related injuries constitute a significant part of emergency department (ED) admissions of geriatric patients. According to Centers for Disease Control reports, 2.5 million nonfatal falls among older adults were treated in EDs and more than 734,000 of these patients were hospitalized in 2013.¹ Recurrent falls are also not uncommon. One-third of individuals over 65 years falls at least once a year and it has been shown that this ratio reached 50% over 80 years.^{2, 3} Injuries due to falls in elderly generally result in minor soft tissue injuries probably due to low energy of the exposed trauma. Some authors reported that only 5–10% of all falls resulted in major injuries like fracture, head trauma, major lacerations.^{4, 5} However falls are generally related with the reduced functionality.

Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the challenging surgical conditions presented in the emergency departments. Clinical scoring systems were developed to reduce the negative appendectomy rate and also to avoid unnecessary diagnostic evaluation. Objectives: The primary aim was to compare the clinical adequacy of the Alvarado, Acute Inflammatory Response, and the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scores in patients with right lower quadrant pain for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Methods: This was a prospective and observational study. All patients over the age of 18 years who presented with a complaint of right lower quadrant pain were enrolled. The Alvarado, Acute Inflammatory Response, and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scoring systems were compared. The patients were either admitted or followed-up as out-patient. Face-to-face or telephone follow-up visits were arranged for the patients who did not have surgery and who were not admitted. Results: 232 patients were included and 14 patients were excluded from the study. Of the 218 patients, 114 patients underwent surgery. Of the 114 patients, 107 patients were pathologically diagnosed with acute appendicitis. It was determined that Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis score was the most valuable score with 0.88 accuracy, followed by Acute Inflammatory Response (area under the curve = 0.79) and Alvarado (area under the curve = 0.71) scores. Conclusion: The accuracy of Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scoring system was higher for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis than the other scores. The cut-off of the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis score from a 7.5-point threshold provides a practical, non-invasive, rapid diagnostic method that increases acute appendicitis discriminative power in patients presenting with right lower quadrant pain.

Small pneumothoraces (PXs), which are not initially recognized with a chest x-ray film and diagnosed by a thoracic computed tomography (CT), are described as occult PX (OCPX). The objective of this study was to evaluate cervival spine (C-spine) and abdominal CT (ACT) for diagnosing OCPX and overt PX (OVPX). All patients with blunt trauma who presented consecutively to the emergency department during a 26-months period were included. Among all the chest CTs (CCTs) (6,155 patients) conducted during that period, 254 scans were confirmed to have a true PX. The findings in their C-spine CT and ACT were compared with the findings in CCTs. Among these patients, 254 had a diagnosis of PX confirmed with CCT. OCPXs were identified on the chest computed tomographic scan of 128 patients (70.3%), whereas OVPXs were evident in 54 patients (29.7%). Computed tomographic imaging of the C-spine was performed in 74% of patients with OCPX and 66.7% of patients with OVPX trauma. Only 45 (35.2%) cases of OCPX and 42 (77.8%) cases of OVPX were detected by C-spine CT. ACT was performed in almost all patients, and 121 (95.3%) of 127 of these correctly identified an existing OCPX. Sensitivity of C-spine CT and ACT was 35.1% and 96.5%, respectively; specificity was 100% and 100%, respectively. Almost all OCPXs, regardless of intrathoracic location, could be detected by ACT or by combining C-spine and abdominal computed tomographic screening for patients. If the junction of the first and second vertebra is used as the caudad extent, C-spine CT does not have sufficient power to diagnose more than a third of the cases. Diagnostic study, level III.