Gerald Gui

Dr. Gerald Gui


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 January 2010 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJ E Rusby
J E Rusby
BSB. L. Smith
B. L. Smith
GGGerald Gui
Gerald Gui
Background: Although effective local control is the primary goal of surgery for breast cancer, the long-term aesthetic outcome is also important. Nipple-sparing mastectomy aims to address this, but there is no consensus on its clinical application. Evidence relating to oncological safety, surgical technique and early data on aesthetic outcome was reviewed. Methods: The review was based on a PubMed search using the terms ‘nipple-sparing’ or ‘subcutaneous mastectomy’ and ‘breast cancer’. Results: Large pathological studies report occult nipple involvement with cancer in 5·6–31 per cent, reflecting variation in inclusion criteria. Recent clinical series with careful patient selection report local recurrence in less than 5 per cent of patients. The incidence of cancer in the retained nipple after risk-reducing mastectomy is less than 1 per cent. Nipple necrosis rates range up to 8 and 16 per cent for total and partial necrosis respectively. Variations in outcome result from differences in extent of resection, placement of incisions and type of breast reconstruction. Conclusion: Nipple-sparing mastectomy is an acceptable technique for women undergoing risk-reducing mastectomy. In the therapeutic setting, it may be offered to patients with smaller tumours far from the nipple and favourable pathological features. Women should be counselled about nipple necrosis and the potential for local recurrence.

1 September 2006 in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GGGerald Gui
Gerald Gui
GKG. Kadayaprath
G. Kadayaprath
NDN. Darhouse
N. Darhouse
JSJ. Self
J. Self
AWA. Ward
A. Ward
RERosalind Eeles
Rosalind Eeles

1 September 2015 in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Daniel LeffDaniel Leff
Daniel Leff
ABAlex Bottle
Alex Bottle
EMErik Frcs Mayer
Erik Frcs Mayer
DPDarren K. Mrcs Patten
Darren K. Mrcs Patten
CRChristopher Rao
Christopher Rao
GGGerald Gui
Gerald Gui
Background: The study aimed to evaluate local and national trends in immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) using the national English administrative records, Hospital Episode Statistics. Our prediction was an increase in implant-only and free flap procedures and a decline in latissimus flap reconstructions. Methods: Data from an oncoplastic center were interrogated to derive numbers of implant-only, autologous latissimus dorsi (LD), LD-assisted, and autologous pedicled or free flap IBR procedures performed between 2004 and 2013. Similarly, Hospital Episode Statistics data were used to quantify national trends in these procedures from 1996 to 2012 using a curve fitting analysis. Results: National data suggest an increase in LD procedures between 1996 (n = 250) and 2002 (n = 958), a gradual rise until 2008 (n = 1398) followed by a decline until 2012 (n = 1090). As a percentage of total IBR, trends in LD flap reconstruction better fit a quadratic (R2 = 0.97) than a linear function (R2 = 0.63), confirming a proportional recent decline in LD flap procedures. Conversely, autologous (non-LD) flap reconstructions have increased (1996 = 0.44%; 2012 = 2.76%), whereas implant-only reconstructions have declined (1996 = 95.42%; 2012 = 84.92%). Locally, 70 implant-assisted LD procedures were performed in 2003 -2004, but only 2 were performed in 2012 to 2013. Conclusions: Implants are the most common IBR technique; autologous free flap procedures have increased, and pedicled LD flap procedures are in decline.

1 July 2016 in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKA. Khan
A. Khan
JZJ. Zhang
J. Zhang
VSV. Sollazzo
V. Sollazzo
KMK. Mohammed
K. Mohammed
GGGerald Gui
Gerald Gui

16 April 2012 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKA Khan
A Khan
ACA Chakravorty
A Chakravorty
GGGerald Gui
Gerald Gui
Background: Classical anatomical descriptions fail to describe variants often observed in the axilla as they are based on studies that looked at individual structures in isolation or textbooks of cadaveric dissections. The presence of variant anatomy heightens the risk of iatrogenic injury. The aim of this study was to document the nature and frequency of these anatomical variations based on in vivo peroperative surgical observations.Methods: Detailed anatomical relationships were documented prospectively during consecutive axillary dissections. Relationships between the thoracodorsal pedicle, course of the lateral thoracic vein, presence of latissimus dorsi muscle slips, variations in axillary and angular vein anatomy, and origins and branching of the intercostobrachial nerve were recorded.Results: Among a total of 73 axillary dissections, 43 (59 per cent) revealed at least one anatomical variant. Most notable variants included aberrant courses of the thoracodorsal nerve in ten patients (14 per cent)—three variants; lateral thoracic vein in 12 patients (16 per cent)—four variants; bifid axillary veins in ten patients (14 per cent); latissimus dorsi muscle slips in four patients (5 per cent); and variants in intercostobrachial nerve origins and branching in 26 patients (36 per cent). The angular vein, a subscapular vein tributary, was found to be a constant axillary structure.Conclusion: Variations in axillary anatomical structures are common. Poor understanding of these variants can affect the adequacy of oncological clearance, lead to vascular injury, compromise planned microvascular procedures and result in chronic pain or numbness from nerve injury. Surgeons should be aware of the common anatomical variants to facilitate efficient and safe axillary surgery.

6 January 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VTVictoria Teoh
Victoria Teoh
MTMarios Konstantinos Tasoulis
Marios Konstantinos Tasoulis
GGGerald Gui
Gerald Gui
The uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is rising with increasing trends that are possibly highest in the USA. Whilst its role is generally accepted in carriers of recognized high-risk predisposition genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 when the affected individual is premenopausal, controversy surrounds the benefit in less understood risk-profile clinical scenarios. This comprehensive review explores the current evidence underpinning the role of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and its impact on contralateral breast cancer risk and survival in three distinct at-risk groups affected by unilateral breast cancer: known genetic carriers, those with strong familial risk but no demonstrable genetic mutation and women who are of young age at presentation. The review supports the role of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in “high risk” groups where the evidence suggests a reduction in contralateral breast cancer risk. However, this benefit is less evident in women who are just young at presentation or those who have strong family history but no demonstrable genetic mutation. A multidisciplinary and personalized approach to support individuals in a shared-decision making process is recommended.