Ependymal tumors are rare CNS tumors and may occur at any age, but their proportion among primary brain tumors is highest in children and young adults. Thus, the level of evidence of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions is higher in the pediatric compared with the adult patient population. The diagnosis and disease staging is performed by craniospinal MRI. Tumor classification is achieved by histological and molecular diagnostic assessment of tissue specimens according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification 2016. Surgery is the crucial initial treatment in both children and adults. In pediatric patients with intracranial ependymomas of WHO grades II or III, surgery is followed by local radiotherapy regardless of residual tumor volume. In adults, radiotherapy is employed in patients with anaplastic ependymoma WHO grade III, and in case of incomplete resection of WHO grade II ependymoma. Chemotherapy alone is reserved for young children <12 months and for adults with recurrent disease when further surgery and irradiation are no longer feasible. A gross total resection is the mainstay of treatment in spinal ependymomas, and radiotherapy is reserved for incompletely resected tumors. Nine subgroups of ependymal tumors across different anatomical compartments (supratentorial, posterior fossa, spinal) and patient ages have been identified with distinct genetic and epigenetic alterations, and with distinct outcomes. These findings may lead to more precise diagnostic and prognostic assessments, molecular subgroup-adapted therapies, and eventually new recommendations pending validation in prospective studies.

To integrate 3D MR spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) in the treatment planning system (TPS) for glioblastoma dose painting to guide simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Background—: Cardiac disease (CD) is one of the major side effects of childhood cancer therapy, but until now little has been known about the relationship between the heart radiation dose (HRD) received during childhood and the risk of CD. Methods and Results—: The cohort comprised 3162 5-year survivors of childhood cancer. Chemotherapy information was collected and HRD was estimated. There were 347 CDs in 234 patients, 156 of them were rated grade ≥3. Cox and Poisson regression models were used. The cumulative incidence of any type of CD at 40 years of age was 11.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5–12.7) and 7·4% (95% CI, 6.2–8.9) when only the CDs of grade ≥3 were considered. In comparison with patients who received no anthracycline and either no radiotherapy or an HRD<0·1Gy, the risk was multiplied by 18·4 (95% CI, 7.1–48.0) in patients who had received anthracycline and no radiotherapy or a HRD <0.1Gy, by 60.4 (95% CI, 22.4–163.0) in those who had received no anthracycline and an HRD≥30Gy, and 61.5 (95% CI, 19.6–192.8) in those who had received both anthracycline and an HRD≥30Gy. Conclusions—: Survivors of childhood cancers treated with radiotherapy and anthracycline run a high dose-dependent risk of developing CD. CDs develop earlier in patients treated with anthracycline than in those treated without it.