Appropriate and timely education about newborn screening (NBS) helps to foster benefits such as prompt follow up, to promote parents’ autonomy via informed consent and minimize the harms such as reducing the impact of NBS false-positive results. The aim of this study was to ascertain how mothers are informed about NBS in the Czech Republic and to identify the variables associated with awareness about NBS. The questionnaires evaluating awareness and its determinants were mailed to a random sample of 3000 mothers 3 months post-delivery. The overall response rate was 42%. We analysed 1100 questionnaires and observed that better awareness about NBS was significantly associated with age, parity, number of information sources, child health status, size of maternity hospital and an obstetrician as the source of prenatally obtained information. Although the majority of mothers (77%) in our study recalled being informed by a physician or nurse in the neonatal ward, results have revealed that over 40% of participants did not have sufficient awareness about the principal aspects of NBS. Several measures including seminars for healthcare providers and the development and distribution of new educational materials were adopted to improve parental education about NBS in the Czech Republic.

Knowledge about newborn screening (NBS) is an important factor for parents to make an informed decision about participation. In Europe, countries inform parents differently about their NBS program, potentially including different knowledge aspects in their information. The aim of this study was to assess twenty-six European parental information products and to analyze their knowledge aspects through a content analysis. The analyzed aspects were compared to a list of eight knowledge aspects from scientific literature. The list includes aspects important for parents’ decision-making, such as the purpose of screening. The study showed that most of the eight knowledge aspects are included in NBS information products of the majority of countries. However, there were differences between countries, for example in the amount of detail and phrasing of the information. Additional relevant knowledge aspects have also been identified and are recommended to optimize information products, such as the handling of residual bloodspot samples. This study only assessed knowledge aspects in information products meant for printing, but many countries also use other communication methods, and the impact on knowledge of the delivery of the information needs further study. Preferences of parents on alternative communication methods need to be considered and evaluated on their effectiveness.

Isolation of genomic DNA is a key step in genetic analysis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the suitability of isolation of DNA from peripheral blood with manual salting-out procedure and automated MagNA system under specific conditions. The impact of storage conditions, type of material (whole blood or blood cells), and method used for DNA extraction were evaluated in terms of DNA yield, its purity, and integrity. Fresh material, and material stored at 2–8°C for 1–4 weeks and frozen at −80°C were tested. For fresh samples, salting-out method gives higher yield than MagNA, irrespectively, on material used. Neither the yield of salting-out method nor its purity decreases during the storage of the samples in the fridge (2–8°C) during 4 weeks. Concerning MagNA, storage of blood cells in the fridge decreases the yield of DNA as well as its purity. For frozen samples, for whole blood, MagNA gives better results while for blood cells, salting-out method seems to be better. For fresh samples, salting-out method is the preferred one, and both whole blood and blood cells can be used. For frozen samples, the preferred method depends on the material.

The communication of genomic results to patients and families with rare diseases raise distinctive challenges. However, there is little evidence about optimal methods to communicate results to this group of service users. To address this gap, we worked with rare disease families and health professionals from two genetic/genomic services, one in the United Kingdom and one in the Czech Republic, to co-design that best meet their needs. Using the participatory methodology of Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD), we conducted observations of clinical appointments (n=49) and interviews with family participants (n=23) and health professionals (n=22) to gather their experience of sharing/receiving results. The findings informed a facilitated co-design process, comprising 3 feedback events at each site and a series of meetings and remote consultations. Participants identified a total of four areas of current service models in need of improvement, and co-designed six prototypes of quality improvement interventions. The main finding was the identification of post-test care as the shared priority for improvement for both health professionals and families at the two sites. Our findings indicate the need to strengthen the link between diagnostics (whether or not a pathogenic variant is found) and post-test care, including psychosocial and community support. This raises implications for the reconfigurations of genomic service models, the redefinition of professional roles and responsibilities and the involvement of rare disease patients and families in health care research.

The Ethics Session of the International Primary Immunodeficiency Congress (IPIC), held in November 2025 and organised by the International Patient Organisation for Primary Immunodeficiencies (IPOPI), examined one of the most challenging developments emerging from genomic-enhanced newborn screening: the identification of serious, non-treatable disorders as incidental detection in programmes originally designed to detect severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). Using a fictionalised clinical scenario based on the recent literature, the session explored the early diagnosis of ataxia–telangiectasia (AT) detected through TREC-based screening. The discussion highlighted the clinical value and psychological risks associated with presymptomatic detection, the persistent shortcomings in parental consent processes, the systemic pressures created by expanding genomic testing, and the ethical challenges surrounding the reporting and management of incidental findings in screening. The debate underscored the need for internationally coordinated frameworks to guide the management of incidental detection in newborn screening as genomic technologies become more deeply embedded in routine public health practice.