Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is a severe hereditary arrhythmia syndrome predominantly affecting children and young adults. It manifests through bidirectional or polymorphic ventricular arrhythmia, often culminating in syncope triggered by physical exertion or emotional stress which can lead to sudden cardiac death. Most cases stem from mutations in the gene responsible for encoding the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2), or in the Calsequestrin 2 gene (CASQ2), disrupting the handling of calcium ions within the cardiac myocyte sarcoplasmic reticulum. Diagnosing CPVT typically involves unmasking the arrhythmia through exercise stress testing. This diagnosis emerges in the absence of structural heart disease by cardiac imaging and with a normal baseline electrocardiogram. Traditional first-line treatment primarily involves β-blocker therapy, significantly reducing CPVT-associated mortality. Adjunctive therapies such as moderate exercise training, flecainide, left cardiac sympathetic denervation and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have been utilized with reasonable success. However, the spectrum of options for managing CPVT has expanded over time, demonstrating decreased rates of arrhythmic events. Furthermore, ongoing research into potential new therapies including gene therapies has the potential to further enhance treatment paradigms. This review aims to succinctly encapsulate the contemporary understanding of the clinical characteristics, diagnostic approach, established therapeutic interventions and the promising future directions in managing CPVT.

Soft robotic sensor arrays for left-atrial mapping demonstrate highly conformal contact to complex patient anatomies.

With an increasing number of elderly individuals, the demand for advanced technologies to treat cardiac diseases has become more critical than ever. Additionally, there is a pressing need to reduce the learning curve for cardiac interventionalists to keep pace with the rapid development of new types of procedures and devices and to expand the adoption of established procedures in more hospitals. This comprehensive review aims to shed light on recent advancements in novel robotic systems for cardiac interventions. To do so, this review provides a brief overview of the history of previously developed robotic systems and describes the necessity for advanced technologies for cardiac interventions to address the technological limitations of current systems. Moreover, this review explores the potential of cutting-edge technologies and methods in developing the next generation of intra-procedure autonomous navigation. Each highlighted topic undergoes a critical analysis to evaluate its technical limitations and the challenges that must be addressed for successful clinical implementation.

The proportion of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs: hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and smoking) has increased over time. The absence of SMuRFs is known to be associated with worse outcomes, but its association with age and sex is uncertain. We sought to evaluate the association between age and sex with the outcomes of post-STEMI patients without SMuRFs among patients without preexisting coronary artery disease. Patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI were identified from the Nationwide Readmission Database of the United States. Clinical characteristics, in-hospital, and 30-day outcomes in patients with or without SMuRFs were compared in men versus women and stratified into five age groups. Between January 2010 and November 2014, of 474,234 patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI, 52,242 (11.0%) patients did not have SMuRFs. Patients without SMuRFs had higher in-hospital mortality rates than those with SMuRFs. Among those without SMuRFs, the in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in women than men (10.6% vs 7.3%, p<0.001), particularly in older age groups. The absence of SMuRFs was associated with higher 30-day readmission-related mortality rates (0.5% vs 0.3% with SMuRFs, p<0.001). Among patients without SMuRFs, women had a higher 30-day readmission-related mortality rates than men (0.6% vs 0.4%, p<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, the increased rates of in-hospital (odds ratio 1.89 (95% CI 1.72 to 2.07) and 30-day readmission-related mortality (hazard ratio 1.30 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.67)) in patients without SMuRFs remained significant. STEMI patients without SMuRFs have a significantly higher risk of in-hospital and 30-day mortality than those with SMuRFs. Women and older patients without SMuRFs experienced significantly higher in-hospital and 30-day readmission-related mortality.