Veronika Odintsova

Dr. Veronika Odintsova

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 May 2023 in Nature Human Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Fiona Alysa HagenbeekFiona Alysa Hagenbeek
Fiona Alysa Hagenbeek
JHJana S. Hirzinger
Jana S. Hirzinger
SBSophie Breunig
Sophie Breunig
SBSusanne Bruins
Susanne Bruins
DKDmitry V. Kuznetsov
Dmitry V. Kuznetsov
DBDorret Irene Boomsma
Dorret Irene Boomsma

28 September 2021 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJenny Van Dongen
Jenny Van Dongen
SGScott D. Gordon
Scott D. Gordon
AMAllan F. McRae
Allan F. McRae
VOVeronika Odintsova
Veronika Odintsova
HMHamdi Mbarek
Hamdi Mbarek
DBDorret Irene Boomsma
Dorret Irene Boomsma
Monozygotic (MZ) twins and higher-order multiples arise when a zygote splits during pre-implantation stages of development. The mechanisms underpinning this event have remained a mystery. Because MZ twinning rarely runs in families, the leading hypothesis is that it occurs at random. Here, we show that MZ twinning is strongly associated with a stable DNA methylation signature in adult somatic tissues. This signature spans regions near telomeres and centromeres, Polycomb-repressed regions and heterochromatin, genes involved in cell-adhesion, WNT signaling, cell fate, and putative human metastable epialleles. Our study also demonstrates a never-anticipated corollary: because identical twins keep a lifelong molecular signature, we can retrospectively diagnose if a person was conceived as monozygotic twin.

1 October 2019 in Psychiatric Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VOVeronika Odintsova
Veronika Odintsova
PRPeter J. Roetman
Peter J. Roetman
HIHill F. Ip
Hill F. Ip
RPRené Pool
René Pool
CLCamiel M. Van der Laan
Camiel M. Van der Laan
DBDorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma
There are substantial differences, or variation, between humans in aggression, with its molecular genetic basis mostly unknown. This review summarizes knowledge on the genetic contribution to variation in aggression with the following three foci: (1) a comprehensive overview of reviews on the genetics of human aggression, (2) a systematic review of genome-wide association studies (GWASs), and (3) an automated tool for the selection of literature based on supervised machine learning. The phenotype definition ‘aggression’ (or ‘aggressive behaviour’, or ‘aggression-related traits’) included anger, antisocial behaviour, conduct disorder, and oppositional defiant disorder. The literature search was performed in multiple databases, manually and using a novel automated selection tool, resulting in 18 reviews and 17 GWASs of aggression. Heritability estimates of aggression in children and adults are around 50%, with relatively small fluctuations around this estimate. In 17 GWASs, 817 variants were reported as suggestive (P ≤ 1.0E−05), including 10 significant associations (P ≤ 5.0E−08). Nominal associations (P ≤ 1E−05) were found in gene-based tests for genes involved in immune, endocrine, and nervous systems. Associations were not replicated across GWASs. A complete list of variants and their position in genes and chromosomes are available online. The automated literature search tool produced literature not found by regular search strategies. Aggression in humans is heritable, but its genetic basis remains to be uncovered. No sufficiently large GWASs have been carried out yet. With increases in sample size, we expect aggression to behave like other complex human traits for which GWAS has been successful.

26 March 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ONOxana Y. Naumova
Oxana Y. Naumova
SRSergey Yu Rychkov
Sergey Yu Rychkov
SKSergey Kornilov
Sergey Kornilov
VOVeronika Odintsova
Veronika Odintsova
VAVarvara О Anikina
Varvara О Anikina
EGElena L. Grigorenko
Elena L. Grigorenko
Early social deprivation (i.e., an insufficiency or lack of parental care) has been identified as a significant adverse early experience that may affect multiple facets of child development and cause long-term outcomes in physical and mental health, cognition and behavior. Current research provides growing evidence that epigenetic reprogramming may be a mechanism modulating these effects of early adversities. This work aimed to investigate the impact of early institutionalization—the immersion in an extreme socially depriving environment in humans—on the epigenome and adaptive behavior of young children up to 4 years of age. We conducted a cross-sectional study involving two comparison groups: 29 children raised in orphanages and 29 children raised in biological families. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles of blood cells were obtained using the Illumina MethylationEPIC array; the level of child adaptive functioning was assessed using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-II. In comparison to children raised in families, children residing in orphanages had both statistically significant deficits in multiple adaptive behavior domains and statistically significant differences in DNA methylation states. Moreover, some of these methylation states may directly modulate the behavioral deficits; according to preliminary estimates, about 7–14% of the deviation of adaptive behavior between groups of children may be determined by their difference in DNA methylation profiles. The duration of institutionalization had a significant impact on both the adaptive level and DNA methylation status of institutionalized children.

29 July 2021 in Frontiers in Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VOVeronika Odintsova
Veronika Odintsova
VRValerie Rebattu
Valerie Rebattu
Fiona Alysa HagenbeekFiona Alysa Hagenbeek
Fiona Alysa Hagenbeek
RPRené Pool
René Pool
JBJeffrey J. Beck
Jeffrey J. Beck
JDJenny Van Dongen
Jenny Van Dongen
We examined the performance of methylation scores (MS) and polygenic scores (PGS) for birth weight, BMI, prenatal maternal smoking exposure, and smoking status to assess the extent to which MS could predict these traits and exposures over and above the PGS in a multi-omics prediction model. MS may be seen as the epigenetic equivalent of PGS, but because of their dynamic nature and sensitivity of non-genetic exposures may add to complex trait prediction independently of PGS. MS and PGS were calculated based on genotype data and DNA-methylation data in blood samples from adults (Illumina 450 K; N = 2,431; mean age 35.6) and in buccal samples from children (Illumina EPIC; N = 1,128; mean age 9.6) from the Netherlands Twin Register. Weights to construct the scores were obtained from results of large epigenome-wide association studies (EWASs) based on whole blood or cord blood methylation data and genome-wide association studies (GWASs). In adults, MSs in blood predicted independently from PGSs, and outperformed PGSs for BMI, prenatal maternal smoking, and smoking status, but not for birth weight. The largest amount of variance explained by the multi-omics prediction model was for current vs. never smoking (54.6%) of which 54.4% was captured by the MS. The two predictors captured 16% of former vs. never smoking initiation variance (MS:15.5%, PGS: 0.5%), 17.7% of prenatal maternal smoking variance (MS:16.9%, PGS: 0.8%), 11.9% of BMI variance (MS: 6.4%, PGS 5.5%), and 1.9% of birth weight variance (MS: 0.4%, PGS: 1.5%). In children, MSs in buccal samples did not show independent predictive value. The largest amount of variance explained by the two predictors was for prenatal maternal smoking (2.6%), where the MSs contributed 1.5%. These results demonstrate that blood DNA MS in adults explain substantial variance in current smoking, large variance in former smoking, prenatal smoking, and BMI, but not in birth weight. Buccal cell DNA methylation scores have lower predictive value, which could be due to different tissues in the EWAS discovery studies and target sample, as well as to different ages. This study illustrates the value of combining polygenic scores with information from methylation data for complex traits and exposure prediction.

10 May 2018 in Twin Research and Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VOVeronika Odintsova
Veronika Odintsova
GWGonneke Willemsen
Gonneke Willemsen
CDConor V. Dolan
Conor V. Dolan
JHJouke-Jan Hottenga
Jouke-Jan Hottenga
NMNicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin
DBDorret Irene Boomsma
Dorret Irene Boomsma
Twin registers are wonderful research resources for research applications in medical and behavioral genetics, epidemiology, psychology, molecular genetics, and other areas of research. New registers continue to be launched all over the world as researchers from different disciplines recognize the potential to boost and widen their research agenda. In this article, we discuss multiple aspects that need to be taken into account when initiating a register, from its preliminary sketch to its actual development. This encompasses aspects related to the strategic planning and key elements of research designs, promotion and management of a twin register, including recruitment and retaining of twins and family members of twins, phenotyping, database organization, and collaborations between registers. We also present information on questions unique to twin registers and twin-biobanks, such as the assessment of zygosity by SNP arrays, the design of (biomarker) studies involving related participants, and the analyses of clustered data. Altogether, we provide a number of basic guidelines and recommendations for reflection when planning a twin register.