This study reports on 382 COVID-19 patients having undergone allogeneic (n = 236) or autologous (n = 146) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) or to the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (GETH). The median age was 54.1 years (1.0–80.3) for allogeneic, and 60.6 years (7.7–81.6) for autologous HCT patients. The median time from HCT to COVID-19 was 15.8 months (0.2–292.7) in allogeneic and 24.6 months (−0.9 to 350.3) in autologous recipients. 83.5% developed lower respiratory tract disease and 22.5% were admitted to an ICU. Overall survival at 6 weeks from diagnosis was 77.9% and 72.1% in allogeneic and autologous recipients, respectively. Children had a survival of 93.4%. In multivariate analysis, older age (p = 0.02), need for ICU (p < 0.0001) and moderate/high immunodeficiency index (p = 0.04) increased the risk while better performance status (p = 0.001) decreased the risk for mortality. Other factors such as underlying diagnosis, time from HCT, GVHD, or ongoing immunosuppression did not significantly impact overall survival. We conclude that HCT patients are at high risk of developing LRTD, require admission to ICU, and have increased mortality in COVID-19.

Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered (CAR)-T cell therapy remains limited by significant toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The optimal management of severe and/or refractory CRS/ICANS remains ill-defined. Anakinra has emerged as a promising agent based on preclinical data, but its safety and efficacy in CAR-T therapy recipients are unknown. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of anakinra to treat refractory CRS and ICANS after CAR-T therapy. The secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of key treatment-, patient-, and disease-related variables on the time to CRS/ICANS resolution and treatment-related mortality (TRM). We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 43 patients with B cell or plasma cell malignancies treated with anakinra for refractory CRS or ICANS at 9 institutions in the United States and Spain between 2019 and 2022. Cause-specific Cox regression was used to account for competing risks. Multivariable cause-specific Cox regression was used to estimate the effect of anakinra dose on outcomes while minimizing treatment allocation bias by including age, CAR-T product, prelymphodepletion (pre-LD) ferritin, and performance status. Indications for anakinra treatment were grade ≥2 ICANS with worsening or lack of symptom improvement despite treatment with high-dose corticosteroids (n = 40) and grade ≥2 CRS with worsening symptoms despite treatment with tocilizumab (n = 3). Anakinra treatment was feasible and safe; discontinuation of therapy because of anakinra-related side effects was reported in only 3 patients (7%). The overall response rate (ORR) to CAR-T therapy was 77%. The cumulative incidence of TRM in the whole cohort was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2% to 17%) at 28 days and 23% (95% CI, 11% to 38%) at 60 days after CAR-T infusion. The cumulative incidence of TRM at day 28 after initiation of anakinra therapy was 0% in the high-dose (>200 mg/day i.v.) recipient group and 47% (95% CI, 20% to 70%) in the low-dose (100 to 200 mg/day s.c. or i.v.) recipient group. The median cumulative incidence of CRS/ICANS resolution from the time of anakinra initiation was 7 days in the high-dose group and was not reached in the low-dose group, owing to the high TRM in this group. Univariate Cox modeling suggested a shorter time to CRS/ICANS resolution in the high-dose recipients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% CI, .94 to 5.12; P = .069). In a multivariable Cox model for TRM including age, CAR-T product, pre-LD ferritin level, and pre-LD Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), higher anakinra dose remained associated with lower TRM (HR, .41 per 1 mg/kg/day increase; 95% CI, .17 to .96; P = .039. The sole factor independently associated with time to CRS/ICANS resolution in a multivariable Cox model including age, CAR-T product, pre-LD ferritin and anakinra dose was higher pre-LD KPS (HR, 1.05 per 10% increase; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.09; P = .02). Anakinra treatment for refractory CRS or ICANS was safe at doses up to 12 mg/kg/day i.v. We observed an ORR of 77% after CAR-T therapy despite anakinra treatment, suggesting a limited impact of anakinra on CAR-T efficacy. Higher anakinra dose may be associated with faster CRS/ICANS resolution and was independently associated with lower TRM. Prospective comparative studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). We performed a retrospective study to evaluate safety and efficacy of axi-cel and tisa-cel outside the setting of a clinical trial. Data from consecutive patients with R/R LBCL who underwent apheresis for axi-cel or tisa-cel were retrospectively collected from 12 Spanish centers. A total of 307 patients underwent apheresis for axi-cel (n=152) and tisa-cel (n=155) from November 2018 to August 2021, of which 261 (85%) received a CAR T infusion (88% and 82%, respectively). Median time from apheresis to infusion was 41 days for axi-cel and 52 days for tisa-cel (P=0.006). None of the baseline characteristics were significantly different between both cohorts. Both cytokine release syndrome and neurologic events (NE) were more frequent in the axi-cel group (88% vs. 73%, P=0.003, and 42% vs. 16%, P<0.001, respectively). Infections in the first 6 months post-infusion were also more common in patients treated with axi-cel (38% vs. 25%, P=0.033). Non-relapse mortality was not significantly different between the axi-cel and tisa-cel groups (7% and 4%, respectively, P=0.298). With a median follow-up of 9.2 months, median PFS and OS were 5.9 and 3 months, and 13.9 and 11.2 months for axi-cel and tisa-cel, respectively. The 12-month PFS and OS for axi-cel and tisa-cel were 41% and 33% (P=0.195), 51% and 47% (P=0.191), respectively. Factors associated with lower OS in the multivariate analysis were increased lactate dehydrogenase, ECOG ≥2 and progressive disease before lymphodepletion. Safety and efficacy results in our real-world experience were comparable with those reported in the pivotal trials. Patients treated with axi-cel experienced more toxicity but similar non-relapse mortality compared with those receiving tisa-cel. Efficacy was not significantly different between both products.

PURPOSE: Approximately 30%-40% of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) infused with CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells achieve durable responses. Consensus guidelines suggest avoiding bendamustine before apheresis, but specific data in this setting are lacking. We report distinct outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy according to previous bendamustine exposure. METHODS: The study included CAR T-cell recipients from seven European sites. Safety, efficacy, and CAR T-cell expansion kinetics were analyzed according to preapheresis bendamustine exposure. Additional studies on the impact of the washout period and bendamustine dose were performed. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were carried out for all efficacy comparisons between bendamustine-exposed and bendamustine-naïve patients. RESULTS: The study included 439 patients with R/R LBCL infused with CD19-targeted commercial CAR T cells, of whom 80 had received bendamustine before apheresis. Exposed patients had significantly lower CD3⁺ cells and platelets at apheresis. These patients had a lower overall response rate (ORR, 53% v 72%; P < .01), a shorter progression-free survival (PFS, 3.1 v 6.2 months; P = .04), and overall survival (OS, 10.3 v 23.5 months; P = .01) in comparison with the bendamustine-naïve group. Following adjustment methods for baseline variables, these differences were mitigated. Focusing on the impact of bendamustine washout before apheresis, those with recent (<9 months) exposure (N = 42) displayed a lower ORR (40% v 72%; P < .01), shorter PFS (1.3 v 6.2 months; P < .01), and OS (4.6 v 23.5 months; P < .01) in comparison with bendamustine-naïve patients. These differences remained significant after IPTW and PSM analysis. Conversely, the cumulative dose of bendamustine before apheresis did not affect CAR-T efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSION: Recent bendamustine exposure before apheresis was associated with negative treatment outcomes after CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy and should be therefore avoided in CAR T-cell candidates.

In this retrospective study, chimeric antigen receptor T cells remained effective in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma after prior exposure to bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) targeting different antigens. These results are relevant to clinical practice, particularly given the increasing use of BsAbs in earlier treatment lines.