Electromagnetic induction (EMI) systems measure the soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa), which is related to the soil water content, texture, and salinity changes. Large‐scale EMI measurements often show relevant areal ECa patterns, but only few researchers have attempted to resolve vertical changes in electrical conductivity that in principle can be obtained using multiconfiguration EMI devices. In this work, we show that EMI measurements can be used to determine the lateral and vertical distribution of the electrical conductivity at the field scale and beyond. Processed ECa data for six coil configurations measured at the Selhausen (Germany) test site were calibrated using inverted electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) data from a short transect with a high ECa range, and regridded using a nearest neighbor interpolation. The quantitative ECa data at each grid node were inverted using a novel three‐layer inversion that uses the shuffled complex evolution (SCE) optimization and a Maxwell‐based electromagnetic forward model. The obtained 1‐D results were stitched together to form a 3‐D subsurface electrical conductivity model that showed smoothly varying electrical conductivities and layer thicknesses, indicating the stability of the inversion. The obtained electrical conductivity distributions were validated with low‐resolution grain size distribution maps and two 120 m long ERT transects that confirmed the obtained lateral and vertical large‐scale electrical conductivity patterns. Observed differences in the EMI and ERT inversion results were attributed to differences in soil water content between acquisition days. These findings indicate that EMI inversions can be used to infer hydrologically active layers.

Detailed knowledge of the intra‐field variability of soil properties and crop characteristics is indispensable for the establishment of sustainable precision agriculture. We present an approach that combines ground‐based agrogeophysical soil and aerial crop data to delineate field‐specific management zones that we interpret with soil attribute measurements of texture, bulk density, and soil moisture, as well as yield and nitrate residue in the soil after potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivation. To delineate the management zones, we use aerial drone‐based normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), spatial electromagnetic induction (EMI) soil scanning, and the EMI–NDVI data combination as input in a machine learning clustering technique. We tested this approach in three successive years on six agricultural fields (two per year). The field‐scale EMI data included spatial soil information of the upper 0–50 cm, to approximately match the soil depth sampled for attribute measurements. The NDVI measurements over the growing season provide information on crop development. The management zones delineated from EMI data outperformed the management zones derived from NDVI in terms of spatial coherence and showed differences in properties relevant for agricultural management: texture, soil moisture deficit, yield, and nitrate residue. The combined EMI–NDVI analysis provided no extra benefit. This underpins the importance of including spatially distributed soil information in crop data interpretation, while emphasizing that high‐resolution soil information is essential for variable rate applications and agronomic modeling.

Multi-coil electromagnetic induction (EMI) systems induce magnetic fields below and above the subsurface. The resulting magnetic field is measured at multiple coils increasingly separated from the transmitter in a rigid boom. This field relates to the subsurface apparent electrical conductivity (σ_a), and σ_a represents an average value for the depth range investigated with a specific coil separation and orientation. Multi-coil EMI data can be inverted to obtain layered bulk electrical conductivity models. However, above-ground stationary influences alter the signal and the inversion results can be unreliable. This study proposes an improved data processing chain, including EMI data calibration, conversion, and inversion. For the calibration of σ_a, three direct current resistivity techniques are compared: Electrical resistivity tomography with Dipole-Dipole and Schlumberger electrode arrays and vertical electrical soundings. All three methods obtained robust calibration results. The Dipole-Dipole-based calibration proved stable upon testing on different soil types. To further improve accuracy, we propose a non-linear exact EMI conversion to convert the magnetic field to σ_a. The complete processing workflow provides accurate and quantitative EMI data and the inversions reliable estimates of the intrinsic electrical conductivities. This improves the ability to combine EMI with, e.g., remote sensing, and the use of EMI for monitoring purposes.

For the first time, we combine depth‐specific soil information obtained from the quantitative inversion of ground‐based multicoil electromagnetic induction data with the airborne hyperspectral vegetation mapping of 1 × 1‐m pixels including Sun‐induced fluorescence (F) to understand how subsurface structures drive above‐surface plant performance. Hyperspectral data were processed to quantitative F and selected biophysical canopy maps, which are proxies for actual photosynthetic rates. These maps showed within‐field spatial patterns, which were attributed to paleo‐river channels buried at around 1‐m depth. The soil structures at specific depths were identified by quantitative electromagnetic induction data inversions and confirmed by soil samples. Whereas the upper plowing layer showed minor correlation to the plant data, the deeper subsoil carrying vital plant resources correlated substantially. Linking depth‐specific soil information with plant performance data may greatly improve our understanding and the modeling of soil‐vegetation‐atmosphere exchange processes.