Mathilde Bonnet

Dr. Mathilde Bonnet

Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2016 in World Journal of Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JGJohan Gagnière
Johan Gagnière
JRJennifer Raisch
Jennifer Raisch
JVJulie Veziant
Julie Veziant
NBNicolas BARNICH
Nicolas BARNICH
RBRichard Bonnet
Richard Bonnet
MBMathilde Bonnet
Mathilde Bonnet
The gut microbiota acts as a real organ. The symbiotic interactions between resident micro-organisms and the digestive tract highly contribute to maintain the gut homeostasis. However, alterations to the microbiome caused by environmental changes (e.g., infection, diet and/or lifestyle) can disturb this symbiotic relationship and promote disease, such as inflammatory bowel diseases and cancer. Colorectal cancer is a complex association of tumoral cells, non-neoplastic cells and a large amount of micro-organisms, and the involvement of the microbiota in colorectal carcinogenesis is becoming increasingly clear. Indeed, many changes in the bacterial composition of the gut microbiota have been reported in colorectal cancer, suggesting a major role of dysbiosis in colorectal carcinogenesis. Some bacterial species have been identified and suspected to play a role in colorectal carcinogenesis, such as Streptococcus bovis, Helicobacter pylori, Bacteroides fragilis, Enterococcus faecalis, Clostridium septicum, Fusobacterium spp. and Escherichia coli. The potential pro-carcinogenic effects of these bacteria are now better understood. In this review, we discuss the possible links between the bacterial microbiota and colorectal carcinogenesis, focusing on dysbiosis and the potential pro-carcinogenic properties of bacteria, such as genotoxicity and other virulence factors, inflammation, host defenses modulation, bacterial-derived metabolism, oxidative stress and anti-oxidative defenses modulation. We lastly describe how bacterial microbiota modifications could represent novel prognosis markers and/or targets for innovative therapeutic strategies.

21 March 2014 in Gut
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAntony Cougnoux
Antony Cougnoux
GDGuillaume Dalmasso
Guillaume Dalmasso
RMRuben Martinez
Ruben Martinez
EBEmmanuel Buc
Emmanuel Buc
JDJulien Delmas
Julien Delmas
RBRichard Bonnet
Richard Bonnet
Background: Escherichia coli strains harbouring the pks island ( pks + E. coli ) are often seen in human colorectal tumours and have a carcinogenic effect independent of inflammation in an AOM/IL-10 −/− (azoxymethane/interleukin) mouse model. Objective: To investigate the mechanism sustaining pks + E. coli -induced carcinogenesis. Method: Underlying cell processes were investigated in vitro and in vivo (xenograft model) using intestinal epithelial cells infected by pks + E. coli or by an isogenic mutant defective for pks ( pks − E. coli ). The results were supported by data obtained from an AOM/DSS (azoxymethane/dextran sodium sulphate) colon cancer mouse model and from human colon cancer biopsy specimens colonised by pks + E. coli or pks− E. coli . Results: Colibactin-producing E. coli enhanced tumour growth in both xenograft and AOM/DSS models. Growth was sustained by cellular senescence (a direct consequence of small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-conjugated p53 accumulation), which was accompanied by the production of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). The underlying mechanisms involve microRNA-20a-5p, which targets SENP1, a key protein regulating p53 deSUMOylation. These results are consistent with the expression of SENP1, microRNA-20a-5p, HGF and phosphorylation of HGF receptor found in human and mouse colon cancers colonised by pks + E. coli . Conclusion: These data reveal a new paradigm for carcinogenesis, in which colibactin-induced senescence has an important role.

15 February 2014 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMathilde Bonnet
Mathilde Bonnet
EBEmmanuel Buc
Emmanuel Buc
PSPierre Sauvanet
Pierre Sauvanet
CDClaude Darcha
Claude Darcha
DDDamien Dubois
Damien Dubois
ADArlette Darfeuille-Michaud
Arlette Darfeuille-Michaud
Purpose: The intestinal microbiota is potentially involved in the development of colorectal carcinoma via various mechanisms. Escherichia coli are commensal bacteria of the human gut microbiota, but some pathogenic strains have acquired the ability to induce chronic inflammation and/or produce toxins, such as cyclomodulin, which could participate in the carcinogenesis process. Here, we analyzed the E. coli population associated with mucosa of patients with colon cancer in relation to clinicopathologic characteristics. We assessed carcinogenic properties of a colon cancer–associated E. coli strain in multiple intestinal neoplasia (Min) mice. Experimental design: Mucosa-associated or internalized E. coli were quantified and characterized from tumors and mucosa of patients with colon cancer and the healthy mucosa of diverticulosis controls. Min mice were inoculated with a colon cancer–associated E. coli strain (11G5). The number of colonic polyps was evaluated at 7 weeks after infection. Results: An increased level of mucosa-associated and internalized E. coli was observed in the tumors compared with normal tissue. A relationship between poor prognostic factors for colon cancer (tumor–node–metastasis stage) and colonization of mucosa by E. coli was observed. Pathogenic cyclomodulin-positive E. coli strains were more prevalent on mucosa of patients with stages III/IV than those with stage I colon cancer. Proliferative index and E. coli colonization level of the mucosa distant from the tumor significantly correlated. Min mice infected with the E. coli strain 11G5 displayed a marked increase in the number of visible colonic polyps compared with controls. Conclusion: These findings support that pathogenic E. coli could be a cofactor in pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 20(4); 859–67. ©2013 AACR.

18 August 1999 in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMathilde Bonnet
Mathilde Bonnet
JGJean-Marc Guinebretiere
Jean-Marc Guinebretiere
EKElisabeth Kremmer
Elisabeth Kremmer
VGVirginie Grunewald
Virginie Grunewald
EBEllen Benhamou
Ellen Benhamou
IJIrene Joab
Irene Joab
BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) may be a cofactor in the development of different malignancies, including several types of carcinomas. In this study, we investigated the presence of EBV in human breast cancers. METHODS: We used tissues from 100 consecutive primary invasive breast carcinomas, as well as 30 healthy tissues adjacent to a subset of the tumors. DNA was amplified by use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with the primers covering three different regions of the EBV genome. Southern blot analysis was performed by use of a labeled EBV Bam HI W restriction fragment as the probe. Infected cells were identified by means of immunohistochemical staining, using monoclonal antibodies directed against the EBV nuclear protein EBNA-1. RESULTS: We were able to detect the EBV genome by PCR in 51% of the tumors, whereas, in 90% of the cases studied, the virus was not detected in healthy tissue adjacent to the tumor ( P <.001). The presence of the EBV genome in breast tumors was confirmed by Southern blot analysis. The observed EBNA-1 expression was restricted to a fraction (5%-30%) of tumor epithelial cells. Moreover, no immunohistochemical staining was observed in tumors that were negative for EBV by PCR. EBV was detected more frequently in breast tumors that were hormone-receptor negative ( P = .01) and those of high histologic grade ( P = .03). EBV detection in primary tumors varied by nodal status ( P = .01), largely because of the difference between subjects with more than three lymph nodes versus less than or equal to three lymph nodes involved (72% versus 44%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated the presence of the EBV genome in a large subset of breast cancers. The virus was restricted to tumor cells and was more frequently associated with the most aggressive tumors. EBV may be a cofactor in the development of some breast cancers.

1 January 2014 in World Journal of Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JRJennifer Raisch
Jennifer Raisch
EBEmmanuel Buc
Emmanuel Buc
MBMathilde Bonnet
Mathilde Bonnet
PSPierre Sauvanet
Pierre Sauvanet
EVEmilie Vazeille
Emilie Vazeille
ADArlette Darfeuille-Michaud
Arlette Darfeuille-Michaud
To provide further insight into the characterization of mucosa-associated Escherichia coli (E. coli) isolated from the colonic mucosa of cancer patients. Phylogroups and the presence of cyclomodulin-encoding genes of mucosa-associated E. coli from colon cancer and diverticulosis specimens were determined by PCR. Adhesion and invasion experiments were performed with I-407 intestinal epithelial cells using gentamicin protection assay. Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 6 (CEACAM6) expression in T84 intestinal epithelial cells was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and by Western Blot. Gut colonization, inflammation and pro-carcinogenic potential were assessed in a chronic infection model using CEABAC10 transgenic mice. Cell proliferation was analyzed by real-time mRNA quantification of PCNA and immunohistochemistry staining of Ki67. Analysis of mucosa-associated E. coli from colon cancer and diverticulosis specimens showed that whatever the origin of the E. coli strains, 86% of cyclomodulin-positive E. coli belonged to B2 phylogroup and most harbored polyketide synthase (pks) island, which encodes colibactin, and/or cytotoxic necrotizing factor (cnf) genes. In vitro assays using I-407 intestinal epithelial cells revealed that mucosa-associated B2 E. coli strains were poorly adherent and invasive. However, mucosa-associated B2 E. coli similarly to Crohn's disease-associated E. coli are able to induce CEACAM6 expression in T84 intestinal epithelial cells. In addition, in vivo experiments using a chronic infection model of CEACAM6 expressing mice showed that B2 E. coli strain 11G5 isolated from colon cancer is able to highly persist in the gut, and to induce colon inflammation, epithelial damages and cell proliferation. In conclusion, these data bring new insights into the ability of E. coli isolated from patients with colon cancer to establish persistent colonization, exacerbate inflammation and trigger carcinogenesis.

14 June 2018 in World Journal of Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RVRomain Villéger
Romain Villéger
ALAmélie Lopès
Amélie Lopès
JVJulie Veziant
Julie Veziant
JGJohan Gagnière
Johan Gagnière
NBNicolas Barnich
Nicolas Barnich
MBMathilde Bonnet
Mathilde Bonnet
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer worldwide. CRC is still associated with a poor prognosis among patients with advanced disease. On the contrary, due to its slow progression from detectable precancerous lesions, the prognosis for patients with early stages of CRC is encouraging. While most robust methods are invasive and costly, actual patient-friendly screening methods for CRC suffer of lack of sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the development of sensitive, non-invasive and cost-effective methods for CRC detection and prognosis are necessary for increasing the chances of a cure. Beyond its beneficial functions for the host, increasing evidence suggests that the intestinal microbiota is a key factor associated with carcinogenesis. Many clinical studies have reported a disruption in the gut microbiota balance and an alteration in the faecal metabolome of CRC patients, suggesting the potential use of a microbial-based test as a non-invasive diagnostic and/or prognostic tool for CRC screening. This review aims to discuss the microbial signatures associated with CRC known to date, including dysbiosis and faecal metabolome alterations, and the potential use of microbial variation markers for non-invasive early diagnosis and/or prognostic assessment of CRC and advanced adenomas. We will finally discuss the possible use of these markers as predicators for treatment response and their limitations.