William D. Freeman

Prof. Dr. William D. Freeman

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2021 in Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RTRabih G. Tawk
Rabih G. Tawk
THTasneem F. Hasan
Tasneem F. Hasan
CDCaitlin E. D’sOuza
Caitlin E. D’sOuza
JPJeffrey B. Peel
Jeffrey B. Peel
WFWilliam D. Freeman
William D. Freeman

1 December 2004 in Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WFWilliam D. Freeman
William D. Freeman
TBThomas G. Brott
Thomas G. Brott
KBKevin M. Barrett
Kevin M. Barrett
PCPablo R. Castillo
Pablo R. Castillo
HDH. Gordon Deen
H. Gordon Deen
JMJames F. Meschia
James F. Meschia

5 February 2014 in The Neurohospitalist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LKLioudmila V. Karnatovskaia
Lioudmila V. Karnatovskaia
KWKatja E. Wartenberg
Katja E. Wartenberg
WFWilliam D. Freeman
William D. Freeman
The earliest recorded application of therapeutic hypothermia in medicine spans about 5000 years; however, its use has become widespread since 2002, following the demonstration of both safety and efficacy of regimens requiring only a mild (32°C-35°C) degree of cooling after cardiac arrest. We review the mechanisms by which hypothermia confers neuroprotection as well as its physiological effects by body system and its associated risks. With regard to clinical applications, we present evidence on the role of hypothermia in traumatic brain injury, intracranial pressure elevation, stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, spinal cord injury, hepatic encephalopathy, and neonatal peripartum encephalopathy. Based on the current knowledge and areas undergoing or in need of further exploration, we feel that therapeutic hypothermia holds promise in the treatment of patients with various forms of neurologic injury; however, additional quality studies are needed before its true role is fully known.

1 November 2010 in Seminars in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMaria Aguilar
Maria Aguilar
WFWilliam D. Freeman
William D. Freeman
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) is defined as bleeding within the brain parenchyma, and occurs twice as commonly as subarachnoid hemorrhage, but is equally as deadly. Risk factors for sICH include hypertension, advanced age, leukoaraiosis, prior ICH, renal failure, use of anticoagulant drugs, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. When a patient is clinically suspected of having sICH, head computed tomography scan is the standard diagnostic tool. However, newer magnetic resonance neuroimaging techniques may aid in determining the underlying pathology and aid in prognosis. Supportive care and blood pressure management are important in the care of patients with sICH. Ongoing research is aimed at determining a safe blood pressure goal that may also prevent expansion of hemorrhage. Hemostatic medications and neuroprotectants have thus far not shown clinical improvement. Although several neurosurgical trials have failed to demonstrate benefit for surgical evacuation of sICH, multiple research trials are ongoing investigating acute blood pressure control, deep or basal ganglionic hemorrhage evacuation via minimally invasive approach (MISTIE; http://mistietrial.com/default.aspx), lobar ICH evacuation (STICH; II http://research.ncl.ac.uk/stich/), and intraventricular thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) (CLEAR III; http://biosgroup-johnshopkinsmedicine.health.officelive.com/default.aspx).

1 June 2021 in Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
COCumara B. O’cArroll
Cumara B. O’cArroll
BBBenjamin L. Brown
Benjamin L. Brown
WFWilliam D. Freeman
William D. Freeman

30 July 2013 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WFWilliam D. Freeman
William D. Freeman
KVKenneth A. Vatz
Kenneth A. Vatz
RGRobert C. Griggs
Robert C. Griggs
TPTimothy Pedley
Timothy Pedley
The American Academy of Neurology Workforce Task Force (WFTF) report predicts a future shortfall of neurologists in the United States. The WFTF data also suggest that for most states, the current demand for neurologist services already exceeds the supply, and by 2025 the demand for neurologists will be even higher. This future demand is fueled by the aging of the US population, the higher health care utilization rates of neurologic services, and by a greater number of patients gaining access to the health care system due to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Uncertainties in health care delivery and patient access exist due to looming concerns about further Medicare reimbursement cuts. This uncertainty is set against a backdrop of Congressional volatility on a variety of issues, including the repeal of the sustainable growth rate for physician reimbursement. The impact of these US health care changes on the neurology workforce, future increasing demands, reimbursement, and alternative health care delivery models including accountable care organizations, nonphysician providers such as nurse practitioners and physician assistants, and teleneurology for both stroke and general neurology are discussed. The data lead to the conclusion that neurologists will need to play an even larger role in caring for the aging US population by 2025. We propose solutions to increase the availability of neurologic services in the future and provide other ways of meeting the anticipated increased demand for neurologic care.