Lateral neck is not recommended for dissection in patients with pN1a papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), but its recurrence risk has not been well stratified. We aimed to develop a risk stratification system for lateral neck recurrence in patients with pN1a PTC. Patients with pN1a PTC who underwent thyroidectomy and unilateral central compartment dissection from 2000–2016 were enrolled. The association between number of central lymph node metastases (CLNMs) and lateral neck recurrence was comprehensively assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model with restricted cubic spline. Stratification was then performed based on CLNMs and other significant risk factors selected by multivariate analysis. Lateral neck recurrent-free survival (LRFS) rate of each stratification was estimated with Kaplan–Meier curve and comparison was performed using log-rank test. Ninety-six (3.8%) lateral neck recurrences were identified during a median follow-up of 62 months among a total of 2500 admitted cases. An increasing number of CLNMs was associated with compromised LRFS for up to 6 CLNMs (P < 0.001), and CLNMs > 3 indicated significantly worse 5-year LRFS than that of CLNM ≤ 3 (90.6% vs. 98.1%, P < 0.001). When stratification with CLNMs and primary tumor size (selected by multivariate analysis, HR (95%CI) = 4.225(2.460–7.256), P < 0.001), 5-year LRFS rates of high- (CLNMs > 3 and primary tumor size > 2 cm), intermediate- (CLNMs > 3 and primary tumor size 1–2 cm) and low-risk (primary tumor size ≤ 1 cm or CLNMs ≤ 3) groups were 78.5%, 90.0% and 97.9%, respectively (P < 0.05). The number of CLNMs combined with primary tumor size seems to effectively stratify lateral neck recurrence risk for patients with pN1a PTC.

Background: Guidelines recommend total thyroidectomy (TT) to facilitate radioactive ablation and serological follow-up for intermediate- to high-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). However, the association between surgical extent and tumor recurrence in these patients has not been well validated. We aimed to examine the association between the extent of surgery and recurrence in patients with completely resected unilateral intermediate- to high-risk PTC. Methods: Patients with completely resected unilateral PTC from 2000 to 2017 in a single institute were reviewed. Those who had extrathyroidal extension (ETE) or lymph node metastasis (LNM, cN1 or pN1 > 5 lymph nodes involved) were included for analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to measure the association between surgical extent and recurrence-free survival (RFS) while adjusting for patient demographic, clinicopathological and treatment variables. Results: A total of 4550 patients (mean[SD] age, 43.0[11.7] years; 3379 women[74.3%]) were included. Of these patients, 2262(49.7%), 656(14.4%), 1032(22.7%), and 600 (13.2%) underwent lobectomy, TT, lobectomy + neck dissection (ND) and TT + ND, respectively. With a median follow-up period of 68 months, after multivariate adjustment, lobectomy was associated with a compromised RFS compared with other surgical extents (HR[95%CI], TT 0.537[0.333–0.866], P = 0.011, lobectomy + ND 0.531[0.392–0.720] P < 0.0001, TT + ND 0.446[0.286–0.697] P < 0.0001). RFS was similar between the two extents with ND (lobectomy + ND, HR [95%CI], 1.196 [0.759–1.885], P = 0.440). Conclusion: Lobectomy alone is associated with an elevated recurrence risk in patients with unilateral intermediate- to high-risk PTC compared with larger surgical extents. However, lobectomy and ND may provide similar tumor control compared with the conventional approach of TT and ND.

Click on the article title to read more.

Background: The role of routine prophylactic central compartment neck dissection (pCCND) for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) remains controversial. The lateral neck recurrence-free survival (LRFS) advantages achieved by pCCND are still under investigation. Methods: The records of 2,074 consecutive patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) at the time of surgery from 1996 to 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 611 consecutive patients were included in the final analyses. We used R version 3.5.1 to match patients with total thyroidectomy (TT)/lobectomy + pCCND with patients with TT/lobectomy alone and analyzed the following factors with a potential influence: age at diagnosis, sex, extrathyroid extension, and primary tumor multifocality and bilaterality. LRFS was analyzed. Moreover, the data were reanalyzed after separating the pairs of patients with pN1a from those with pN0. Results: We were able to select 159 pairs sharing the major prognostic risk factors as listed. Overall, there was no difference in the LRFS, although patients with pCCND more often had recurrence. Moreover, the central lymph node metastasis status had no significant influence on the risk of recurrence. Conclusion: Routine pCCND was not a protective factor for LRFS in PTMC patients with cN0. The difference in LRFS between pN0 and pN1a was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).