Background and Purpose: Individualized assessment of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) activity is usually performed through phenotyping following administration of a probe drug to measure the enzyme's activity. To avoid any iatrogenic harm (allergic drug reaction, dosing error) related to the probe drug, the development of non‐burdensome tools for real‐time phenotyping of CYP2D6 could significantly contribute to precision medicine. This study focuses on the identification of markers of the CYP2D6 enzyme in human biofluids using an LC‐high‐resolution mass spectrometry‐based metabolomic approach.Experimental Approach: Plasma and urine samples from healthy volunteers were analysed before and after intake of a daily dose of paroxetine 20 mg over 7 days. CYP2D6 genotyping and phenotyping, using single oral dose of dextromethorphan 5 mg, were also performed in all participants.Key Results: We report four metabolites of solanidine and two unknown compounds as possible novel CYP2D6 markers. Mean relative intensities of these features were significantly reduced during the inhibition session compared with the control session (n = 37). Semi‐quantitative analysis showed that the largest decrease (−85%) was observed for the ion m/z 432.3108 normalized to solanidine (m/z 398.3417). Mean relative intensities of these ions were significantly higher in the CYP2D6 normal–ultrarapid metabolizer group (n = 37) compared with the poor metabolizer group (n = 6). Solanidine intensity was more than 15 times higher in CYP2D6‐deficient individuals compared with other volunteers.Conclusion and Implications: The applied untargeted metabolomic strategy identified potential novel markers capable of semi‐quantitatively predicting CYP2D6 activity, a promising discovery for personalized medicine.

In this study, we assessed the potential use of the 1β-hydroxy-deoxycholic acid (1β-OH-DCA) to deoxycholic acid (DCA) urinary metabolic ratio (UMR) as a CYP3A metric in ten male healthy volunteers. Midazolam (MDZ) 1 mg was administered orally at three sessions: alone (control session), after pre-treatment with fluvoxamine 50 mg (12 h and 2 h prior to MDZ administration), and voriconazole 400 mg (2 h before MDZ administration) (inhibition session), and after a 7-day pre-treatment with the inducer rifampicin 600 mg (induction session). The 1β-OH-DCA/DCA UMR was measured at each session, and correlations with MDZ metrics were established. At baseline, the 1β-OH-DCA/DCA UMR correlated significantly with oral MDZ clearance (r = 0.652, p = 0.041) and C_max (r = −0.652, p = 0.041). In addition, the modulation of CYP3A was reflected in the 1β-OH-DCA/DCA UMR after the intake of rifampicin (induction ratio = 11.4, p < 0.01). During the inhibition session, a non-significant 22% decrease in 1β-OH-DCA/DCA was observed (p = 0.275). This result could be explained by the short duration of CYP3A inhibitors intake fixed in our clinical trial. Additional studies, particularly involving CYP3A inhibition for a longer period and larger sample sizes, are needed to confirm the 1β-OH-DCA/DCA metric as a suitable CYP3A biomarker.

Drug metabolic enzymes and transporters are responsible for an important variability in drug disposition. The cocktail approach is a sound strategy for the simultaneous evaluation of several enzyme and transporter activities for a personalized dosage of medications. Recently, we have demonstrated the reliability of the Geneva cocktail, combining the use of dried blood spots (DBS) and reduced dose of phenotyping drugs for the evaluation of the activity of six cytochromes and P-glycoprotein (P-gp). As part of a study evaluating potential drug–drug interactions between probe drugs of the Geneva cocktail, the present paper focuses on the impact of cytochromes (CYP) probe drugs on the disposition of fexofenadine, a P-gp test drug. In a randomized four-way Latin-square crossover study, 30 healthy volunteers (15 men and 15 women) received caffeine 50 mg, bupropion 20 mg, flurbiprofen 10 mg, omeprazole 10 mg, dextromethorphan 10 mg, midazolam 1 mg, and fexofenadine 25 mg alone (or as part of a previously validated combination) and all together (Geneva cocktail). The determination of drug concentrations was performed in DBS samples and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Fexofenadine AUC_{0–8 h} and C_max decreased by 43% (geometric mean ratio: 0.57; CI 90: 0.50–0.65; p < 0.001) and 49% (geometric mean ratio: 0.51; CI 90: 0.44–0.59; p < 0.001), respectively, when fexofenadine was administered as part of the Geneva cocktail in comparison to fexofenadine alone. Consequently, the apparent oral clearance (Cl/F) increased 1.7-fold (CI 90: 1.49–1.93; p < 0.001). There was no interaction between the remaining probes. In conclusion, an unexpected interaction occurred between fexofenadine and one or several of the following substances: caffeine, bupropion, flurbiprofen, omeprazole, dextromethorphan, and midazolam. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the mechanism of this interaction.

Modern approaches for the phenotyping of cytochrome P450 enzymes in children. Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology. Accepted 3 June 2020.